>>155221 It's not even the end of the month, demon!

>>155211 This is pretty hilarious honestly, lol. I never trusted this kind of shoddy repositories and was always surprised with how liberal people were in using them. Same with pip or even those sites distributing flatpaks, appimages and whatever else. >This marks the second major incident of protest by an open source developer this year, following January's 'colors' and 'fakers' self-sabotage incident, as first reported by BleepingComputer. >Initially, users suspected that the libraries 'colors' and 'faker' used by these projects were compromised [1, 2, 3], similar to how coa, rc, and ua-parser-js libraries were hijacked last year by malicious actors. wew

>>155198 >empty egg carton that's an absolutely brutal roast, I'm stealing that

>>155223 >also javascript I rest my case

>>155222 Speaking of demons, any news about the foxy stone mama?

>>155226 >foxy [..] mama Carmelita fox?

>>155121 That's literally what I said but you didn't word it like a spastic fuck you.

>>155227 No, that nine tailed fox that was inside a stone which broke recently.

>>155226 >>155229 Unless the japanese lied, she was exorcised long long ago. The stone was just an empty stone.

>>155229 >>155230 Oh yeah and I guess Noah's Ark was a real event that happened, too?

>>155231 >He wasn't there

>>155230 Im pretty sure soon we will see totally real footage of a jap priest going there and dicking the foxgirl back into a rock.

>>55 :^) 0 >>155211 >>155213 >>155214 >>155215 >>155216 >>155218 >>155219 >>155219 >>155220 >>155223 >>155225 Oh, come one, guys, can't you just fork it if it's THAT much of an issue?

>>155237 You might as well never update your system. Congrats, it's a fork that will never have soydevs writing malicious code.

>>155231 >I guess Noah's Ark was a real event that happened Yes, it is. Why else doesn't the Turkish government allow Western tourists to wonder around their mountains?

...must suck kazu dick... ...kazu so fucking hot...

>>155200 >>155202 He probably doesn't have a Twitter account, I've run into the same problem for the same reason. Before this there wasn't any reason to have an account if you weren't going to tweet yourself and didn't care about having a "feed". I still haven't made a Twitter account but for anyone who needs one I assume they still want a phone number to make one? Making a Twilio might still be a way around that, since they give you a phone number for a month that can receive SMS online and wouldn't be blacklisted like the public SMS-receiving numbers since it's custom, but I haven't checked for years so I don't know if it still works.

>>155242 If you're going to make a social media account, why bother with Twatter in the first place when there are so many alternatives?

>>155168 Come on. You know why. >>155169 >to remove them you had to mess with 5 different settings panels. You just have to block outgoing connections to Microsoft servers. They never show up again after that. >>155181 "If you or a loved one has become a victim of JCSA (jewish childhood sexual abuse), you may be entitled to compensation..." >>155243 But bro dude! How will I ever learn about the epic global happenings if I'm not part of the Largest Social Media Network (question it and be banned) where all the happening dudes and Official Legitimate Media post?!

>>155242 >>155243 >>155244 Speaking of social media, decided to pull up the terms for Trump's new social media site, Truth Social, and the terms are the exact same ones that you will find on Twatter; such as the "Don't be racist, transphobic, swear, talk dirty, etc.": https://archive.ph/Ywbz3

>>155242 Fortunately nitter still allows you to see content twitter won't serve you. >Twilio I'll give that a try. I was looking into shitposting someone but couldn't get past the phone block.

>>155243 Because something you want to see is there. For instance Twitter is the easiest way to dig for journo conflicts of interest, just search the username of the journo and the subject together and see if there's any tweets indicating they're friends or whatever. You don't need a Twitter account to do that, which is why I've never made one, but now that they're blocking images from some accounts for "age-restriction" that might provide a reason for some people. >>155246 >Fortunately nitter still allows you to see content twitter won't serve you. Oh, it does? I tried it a while back and it didn't work, but that was soon after the Twitter change so maybe they fixed it. >Twilio Tell me whether it still works. I think they sometimes request phone verification themselves, but their blacklists are much less comprehensive so if they do you can probably use a public SMS-receiver number. The account will then come with a non-public number that lasts for a month and can receive Twitter SMS via the website, assuming it still works the same way it worked years ago.

Baker?

>>155248 no

>>155249 Finally someone with some sense to close this fucking gate. I for one welcome the end of this wild ride. >>155242 I heard twitter was adding a dislike feature or just recently added it. I am expecting that to make browsing even more of a chore. They claimed it would not effect the reach of a tweet or visibility but I fully expect it to make finding "problematic" replies very difficult.

>>155248 *Num*

>>155248 It's St Patrick's Day, you know what that means

>>155253 Time to force niggers in every St Patrick's Day procession, program and guinness commercial because fuck white culture?

>>155253 Seconding this. Like I said earlier I'm on a trip away from my regular PC so I won't be able to make new threads until next week. Have to go out soon, anyway.

>>155253 leprecunny?

Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446 Next bread: >>556446

>>154991 (checked)