>>167927 >TOR Put on an ID and then talk, coward.

>>167928 No

>>167929 Then fuck off or help.

>>167930 No

>>167931 Pathetic.

>>167933 What would you do to disrupt Youtube?

>>167924 >everyone I don't like is niggerpill Fuck off, then. You don't understand the logistics of things like this. YouTube operates at a loss. Controlling the narrative is more important than profiting off the goyim. This has always been the case for all media. Newspapers, Hollywood, the Internet–it doesn't matter. They'll gladly lose cash hand over fist on these endeavors as long as they have a monopoly on all speech, all communication, and all thought. They own all banks and all governments. Their front-end media empire is propped up through funding achieved by the control of all discourse. They funnel people into buying what they want them to buy, paying what they want them to pay, and voting for what they want them to support. And they profit from that overall. For this reason, you cannot create a YouTube alternative. It's not financially viable. YOU would have to care about that; they don't. If you create an alternative, they simply close your bank account, block your IP from their ISPs, and pull your hosting.

>>167934 I've been actively reuploading content on Odysee

>>167921 >You peruse the comment section and there's always people replying to others who no longer exist, like if you see @InsertNameHere that's how youtube replies work for individuals and notifications. How old are the videos that you're seeing this occur to? Because that's been a know issue with the site since 2013, where the old comment system was broken when they adopted the Google+ integration, which you can see with all pre-2013 comments.

>>579146 I saw that.

>>167921 >maybe if you have alternatives Does no one ever go through the fucking list: >>167312

>>167939 He's the retard who spent half the thread responding to luciano. He's literally fucking brain dead.

>>167935 If it operates at a loss then it wants something else. There are two options, tank their money extremely to effect their other prospects, or target their real currency, people. People can be moved, that's what i'm talking about and i'm NOT talking about making some video on the platform. That's out of the scenario, they control that platform. There are other ways to circumvent that. Twitter, Discord, E-mail, alternative platforms, starting incidents, attacking corporations and inviting extremes against them. Hell, if you can't inspire ire against a certain company, pick an EASIER target. Maybe the solution ISN'T attacking youtube directly, maybe it's attacking smaller corporations to inspire general hatred for all corporations. Maybe literally just talking to people you know about points we gather that are factual and observable, small steps shit. There needs to be a plan, and someone needs to follow through on it. We did so much shit with deepfreeze just cataloguing media, that alone was a major catalyst in the lost trust of democrats today, simply by showing lies. The thing about monopolies is they're actually very fragile. If no one LIKES THEM, if people SHOW IRE, it scares investors and shit starts crashing down. Like it or not the people who aren't concerned with money need to scam the people who ARE concerned with money, which is why Elon Musk's twitter scare is working. You can't build an empire with a bunch of Marxists, you need people to actually manage the capital to ensure that losses are acceptable. >>167939 You have no reading comprehension, I know of the alternatives.

>>167940 Silence, TOR niggerpill.

>>167941 >I know of the alternatives Okay, then what's the fucking point of your post? We KNOW about the issue with Jewtube. They censor videos, censor comments, censor dislikes, blacklist uploads, unsubscribe users, we could go on all day. And, to solve the issue, that's the main reason why there's subjects that have become recent threads staples: First: We have the alternatives list, with the purpose of it being a go-to post to refer to you need some of the most common category of sites and software needed in the age of the net. Second: There's operation C&D: >>>/t/5546 Who's purpose is to populate any site that videos that you already to go Jewtube for. The only problem, HOWEVER, is that, AFAIK, me and one other Anon seem to be the only ones actually following through on using alternatives to Jewtube. Meanwhile, everyone fucking else keeps liking to Jewtube, or even a front-end, without giving one single shit about the fact that THEY are part of the problem that they keep bitching about.

>>167943 >Meanwhile, everyone fucking else keeps liking to Jewtube, or even a front-end, without giving one single shit about the fact that THEY are part of the problem that they keep bitching about. Why do you think that is? There's a solvable problem for that, an alternative that has no hook from a marketing standpoint will not be used, the original will still have the power of numbers from the unaware. So, what are we doing wrong? First question we should ask. How do we improve this? What other operations can we run? There needs to be a concerted effort on different shit outside of C&D, we need to market our "product". That requires an incident, which needs build up. You ever consider a black media operation? Controversy? Dirt digging? Maybe even a little white lie here and there? The issue is that we're not fighting dirty, we're archiving. Archival doesn't get views, it's passive and only prepares for the fall of the main site, but the fall needs to be orchestrated for ANY of that work to have effects. The bar is lowered. It's clear that honesty does not work. So we need to start learning the game these people play and use more then just honest stoicism to beat this, otherwise we WILL have problems that will blindside our shit.

>>167915 >Like Transformers Devastation? It would work. 80s MLP was pretty hardcore.

>>167911 Your loss, Izzy and Sunny are adorable.

Since it's the end of the thread: Sweden is currently having some good old fashioned race riots, with stolen cop cars and fires around for days. Would be really unfortunate if Russia gets some crazy ideas now.

>>167944 >Why do you think that is? Because everyone is so used to going to Jewtube to search for media. Kind of like how the #1 search result in M$' Bing search engine is "Google", despite whether or not Bing would provide better results. >So, what are we doing wrong? Idiots are linking to Jewtube and Invidious front-ends first when everything would be easily solved if they either searched for the same content on other sites (Like trailers are insanely easy to find on NicoNico and Dailymotion), or downloaded the video and uploaded the MP4/WEBM. A practice people used to encourage and bully people for if they got lazy and just direct linked to Jewtube. Not to mention all the morons that have installed frontends like Freetube on their smartphones. >How do we improve this? Aside from constantly bitching and changing your own habits, and talking to people IRL, nothing else really. >What other operations can we run? Aside from C&D, nothing. >You ever consider a black media operation? Controversy? Dirt digging? Maybe even a little white lie here and there? And, for what purpose? There haven been TENS OF THOUSANDS of videos exposing how Jewtube is actively working to undermine their viewers, undermine their creators, and undermine the very content people are looking for. And, you've HAD people banging the drum that people should start going to alternative platforms for video content. Hell, I was banging that drum as far back as 2017 when I was posting Let's Plays. However, very few people actually care. You can show people how they can find everything they're looking for, including exactly the same content that they demand, is over on DailyMotion, Vimeo, Bitchute, Odysee, Rumble, Veoh, and they still go crawling back to Jewtube at the end of the day. It also doesn't help matters that people have built their entire careers of of Jewtube, and refuse to leave because they'll lose money otherwise. This isn't a niggerpill post to say "Nothing can be done." Something CAN be done, but that "something" is entirely dependent on the actions of one person: You. In fact, have you considered the fact that YOU are part of the problem by the very fact that you brought up a question relating an issue with Jewtube, and thereby implying that you're still actively using the site?!

>>167948 Jesus Christ anon, calm down.

>>167947 May they all burn together.

>>167948 >And, for what purpose? There haven been TENS OF THOUSANDS of videos exposing how Jewtube is actively working to undermine their viewers, undermine their creators, and undermine the very content people are looking for. I straight up told you i'm not suggesting videos on any platform. I'm talking about attacking their profits and marketing directly Early on we targeted media advertisements WITHOUT making videos about it. We need to adopt more tactics akin to that by compiling lists of benefactors and company connections. Who finances who and who's at the end of the chain that has benefactors we can appeal to and target. For a fake example chain, we have Youtube. Youtube is connected to Pornhub. Pornhub is connected to Randoname Marketing CO. Randoname Marketing CO has a liberal benefactor named Rainbowhair Incorporated. Rainbowhair Incorparated relies on good relations, but the inner part of it is concerned with diversity. Spread rumors and make complaints that Randoname Marketing has been putting out sexist ads or is connected to sexist so and so. Chain between Randoname and Rainbowhair is broken, target Randoname to get at Pornhub. Target Pornhub to get at Youtube. Cause chaos. Break em down from where you can.

>>167951 Why are you skipping a line for each sentence? Looks like you're just trying to make your post look bigger than it actually is.

>>167951 >I'm talking about attacking their profits and marketing directly Okay, how? >Early on we targeted media advertisements WITHOUT making videos about it. How? >Who finances who and who's at the end of the chain that has benefactors we can appeal to and target. How? Go and show us a working proof of concept (Another, get the project started yourself) that demonstrates what you're asking for, and then come back and tell us how we should be acting.

>>167948 >ncluding exactly the same content that they demand, is over on DailyMotion, Vimeo, Bitchute, Odysee, Rumble, Veoh No you can't.

>>167947 They can't destroy eachother, right?

>>167947 How is the Swedish government so damn incompetent? >>167952 That's also what I said. He's writing style is getting very identifiable, to the point that being an anonymous user is meaningless.

>>167956 >He's *His

>>167954 Okay, what content do you often search for?

>>167958 I bet he likes homos

NEW BREAD >>579211 >>579211 >>579211 >>579211 >>579211 >>579211 >>579211 >>579211 >>579211 >>579211 >>579211 NEW BREAD

https://archive.ph/wip/gGu1u Twitter goes poison pill on Elon Time to short those stocks Monday....

>>167953 Look into financial groups that support Youtube, then look into THEIR financial groups. It's public info.

>>167949 Why the fuck should he? aside from cutting out the redtext