>>266968 FBI detected.

>>266970 > there isnt as much CIA Baneposting is a much more permanent fixture than "for the win" ever was, mostly because normalfags never really understood Baneposting. Normalfags adopted "for the win" and killed it like they kill everything.

>>266887 Some of us haven't left the 90s, and to us, electric means resistive heat. Only poor people use electric stoves because it's "safer", that is, those stupid poor people are less likely to start a fire with it. Induction is still pretty new to some people, and to them you have to get over the stigma of resistive electric heat.

>>266973 You're saying they think internet hurmor is their ally. But they merely adopted the humor; meanwhile we gave birth to it, moulded it. And, they didn't understand the humor until we were already men, by when it was nothing to us but days past!

>>266973 I disagree, i think it's mostly petered out and the only ones who do it anymore are, again, autists who'd probably still be making cockmongler edits if they were around for it when it was hot.

>>266973 >normalfags never really understood Baneposting. Anon, baneposting became a normalfag meme many years ago now. Did you forget the Pornhub parody?

>>266973 Baneposting is a funny joke. Saying for the win isn't a funny joke. It's just being zany which is childish, and most anons aren't teenagers anymore so they don't act zany.

Burgers, what happened with your airplanes today? Was the system hacked, or did some newbie just disconnect the wrong wires?

>>266976 It's a good thing you aren't in charge anon. >>266977 Normalfags saw us Baneposting and tried to imitate it. They never understood it and they gave up quickly.

>>266979 The FAA just sucks balls and has a monopoly on air traffic control because a free market would do it worse. Allegedly it was a system upgrade from manual telephone calls to hear the forecast to a digital system, and of course weather is a big deal to pilots so the planes were grounded for several hours.

>>266981 >because a free market would do it worse How so?

>>266982 Being legally obligated to put shareholder profits first over system upgrades and scheduled maintenance. The FAA also has close ties to FCC over radio frequency licensing and violations.

>>266983 >the free market would make it worse because of a government imposed legal obligation Are you okay?

>>266984 I don't think air traffic can fall under the "100% free market" category, since at most it would be like in rural as fuck areas like northern canada and poorfag islands where it's just pilot to pilot radio and using visual identification. I doubt anyone would pay for air traffic control at all in a truly free market, you'd probably not land at any airport you don't own anyway, and all your signals would probably be jammed by someone deciding to use it to broadcast long range internet on that frequency. So yes, you got me, I didn't mean a truly free market but just opening up air traffic to corporate management.

>>266983 >Being legally obligated to put shareholder profits first over system upgrades and scheduled maintenance. Companies are never legally obligated to become a public company. What are you talking about?

>>266977 >Did you forget the Pornhub parody? Early days of the brony fandom Cuckchan /mlp/ board made live action porn parody of my little pony with cosplayers.

>>266983 Also, I think that ruling only has jurisdiction in like Maryland. >>266985 The bigger issue is you cannot have a free market and globalism which would mean that international air travel basically wouldn't function.

fug

>>266986 I don't think a company like that would stay private for long, it would take a pretty severe autist to want to keep plane management in the family instead of selling it off and pocketing change to avoid blowback from the first fuckup. Especially with the possibility of competing air traffic companies, if two otherwise equal companies go public, the one going public first would get a gorillion dollars in an IPO and allow the owner to cash out. >>266988 I would consider the free government to be the opposite of statism, from your government there would probably be no limitation to fly international. And most countries can already accept small private planes at a customs checkpoint to inspect your luggage after landing, it isn't like the airline travel experience where you have to hand over a passport and scan your luggage before ever getting on a plane.

>>266989 1 foot dick man.

>>266989 Her face looks like a female angry Trunks in that shot kek

>>266993 Bakunny

>>266990 >it would take a pretty severe autist to want to keep plane management in the family instead of selling it off and pocketing change to avoid blowback from the first fuckup Do you know that a lot of today's biggest companies stayed private for decades until the founder died, right?

>>266966 >shotas with oversized clothes Fuck, that's one of my biggest weaknesses. Shotas wearing adult-sized clothes, animal costumes, onesies, pajamas or that are holding a plushie are so cute that make me go insane.

>>266981 >>266983 >>266985 >>266990 Are you a retard leftie? Do you actually understand what the fuck your even talking about?

>>266997 >your >leftie

>>266998 Answer the bloody question.

>>266996 >3rd image >warm water bottle That's a bear.

>>266999 I only reciprocated in kind. No, what makes you say that? Just that there is a discussion which is politically ambiguous and doesn't fit in a neatly-cut hole? I already said that in a truly lolbert free market there likely wouldn't be coordinated air traffic control. You'd probably have to sign a contract with the airport representing a few hundred landowners just to have the concept of controlled airspace. But you probably just want to namecall instead of coming to logical endpoints.

>>267001 >a truly lolbert free market there likely wouldn't be coordinated air traffic control You haven't posted anything that would either prove or deny that. Just an assumption.

>>266994 Underhanded bread stealing. NEW BREAD! >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 >>766132 NEW BREAD!

>>267002 My source is that real lolbertism hasn't been tried yet :^) But I have though, there's a youtuber called missionary bush pilot who flies around papa new guinea, and like I mentioned, outside of a few miles near the big airport, it's mostly uncontrolled airspace where you just call out on the radio when you're landing. Same in northern canada, some guy was flying from burgerland to yurop by small plane and it was just frenchies chatting since there was noone to tell them to shut up for callouts. Sure, there might be individual air traffic control just to direct traffic intending to land in a neat and orderly fashion, but there would be no reason to coordinate with other companies. Modern jumbo jets have a pretty good radar, to the point where they are one of the prime contributors to weather forecasts, it would be needless to tie in with what would likely quickly become tens of thousands of individual airports once any patch of land big enough can become an airport.

>>267004 Also your plane would obviously have armaments to shoot down any plane on an intentional or unintentional collision path :^)

>>266958 Gamergate is dead.

>>267006 You don't post in threads about something that's dead.