>>324020
<Humanity is taxonomically five species
Just saying things doesn't make it
<AND abstract thought is found only in a minority of each species
Let's go through your post.
>Nonwhites are, by and large, incapable of abstract thought as a whole
Okay, that's your first statement
> "That's racist" is the only reason the last century of biology and sociology hasn't been reoriented around the distinguishing of humanity into five distinct species
And that's the one immediately after it.
It looks like you're saying that nonwhites being by and large incapable of abstract thought(as a whole) is evidence that there is 5 distinct species of humans.
You might not have meant that, but you can see how looks can't you?
<Incorrect
Correct. If you aren't going to base species on something concrete like genetic compatibility, then what is to stop me from calling my cousin a different species?
<No one said this.
Autist, I'm calling you biased. You're perfectly fine to say that the modern taxonomical system is wrong about how it classifies humans
despite the fact that your only basis for it is that niggers are stupid when it suits you. When I say that it's wrong about how it classifies species of other genera
and have something actually concrete behind it, nah the modern science is actually correct this time.
<Do you want the percentage of people capable of abstract thought, or the numbers regarding genetic distance?
All of them
<The former is only a broad assumption based on extremely scant data
I rest my case.
>>324034
Homo nigreos, homo hispanicus, homo chinkachonkatus, homo judeus, and homo europa.