/hebe/ - hebe

Secret Club

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0.

US Election Thread

8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

(284.77 KB 538x759 76039381_p0.jpg)

Anonymous 09/16/2021 (Thu) 20:25:00 No. 8850
Even when initial sexual contact with a child isn't harmful, expecting them to keep it a secret is harmful. It weighs on their mind and inhibits their ability to communicate freely. You'd have to be autistic to knowingly take action that puts a child in harm's way, just because the harm is "society's fault".
>>8850 What's your point?
>>8858 Fiction that involves non-exploitative adult-child sexual relationships should take place in a setting where it's not taboo, else it glorifies taking on stress and unnecessary risks for dick/pussy. Forbidden romance is shallow trite for contrarians.
>>8860 based tbh I don't like that I like imagining better worlds in fiction aka. ones where you can marry cute tots
>>8860 >Forbidden romance is shallow trite for contrarians It's more realistic and it hits me in the feels
>>8862 realism is gay if you want realism go get arrested
>>8862 want fucky but government no letty Do you really need a complete fictional narrative just to tell you something you already know(state bad)? Wouldn't you prefer something that either shows the seldom mentioned virtues of child love, or something that provides a nice vicarious experience?
shite b8 m8
>>8864 But it does provide a nice vicarious experience, realistically, with all the feels that come with it Look at this https://nhentai.net/g/288695/ and tell me it's about "state bad" and not about the romance.
>>8866 boring
>>8866 It's about a bunch of sex scenes with most of the realistic progression between them skipped. Also, inexplicable sex expert lolis mean not having shy and curious lolis.
>>8870 >It's about a bunch of sex scenes It's hentai
>>8874 Okay, the progression can also occur during the sex, but it doesn't do that either. It just skips the interesting parts of loli sex in favor of template scenarios.
>>8891 Disagree.
>>8892 So you think children being inexplicable experts at sex is interesting?
>>8895 I think it is typical of hentai, and I think it's immaterial to the topic at hand.
>>8856 like pic related imagine how bad she felt after she realized she shouldn't have kids with her brother
>>8907 Ya should always have sex with your brother and make babbyz.
>>8909 >have sex with your brother no that's gay
>>8907 But her children will be related to her brother regardless of who she has them with.
Why must imageboards shit on everything, even among pedophiles, shit yourself faggot
wincest is based
Gee guys I wonder why most people think we are nothing but coomers.
>>8926 people want to kill us, who cares what other opinion of us beyond that one they have
>>8926 muh optics
>>8926 I'd be more concerned with being treated worse than a murderer
>>8852 The presumption of harm is a projection stemming from society's perception of the initial act. If someone says they touched a child sexually, the default response is to assume that child was harmed and that they are traumatized, disregarding that perception of harm by the child can be a learned response, similar to how babies learn to cry when they hurt themselves due to the parent's response.
>>8930 So what you are saying is that antis harm children?
>>8926 I think most people are subhuman trash so it's just as well
>>8931 In some cases their gaslighting does result in harm and trauma that possibly wouldn't have resulted otherwise, intentional or not.
>>8931 yes
https://medium.com/@trekfaerie/antis-will-have-a-body-count-89390b491716 An anti did this over art that you could make a weak argument was pedo. If antis can do this over something so petty, they can do worse over things that actually matter.
>>8967 didn't click this link summarize it
(209.27 KB 1280x720 maxresdefault.jpg)

>>8969 didn't look at this image describe it
>>8967 >Anti >"Nooo! Please stop killing pedophiles you ANTI PEDOPHILE, let us draw whatever we want waaaaaah" Stay mad, you freak. dotr will hurt
>>10828 >I'm going to kill randos for drawing things I don't like instead of the Jews because I'm a useful idiot


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply