It's my sincere hope that in a few hundred years people will be debating whether or not women are even capable of being potty-trained. Like obviously they'll have historical evidence to support that it must have been that way in the past but then they'll look at all of the impractical women's fashion throughout history. The oversized dresses, and all the anecdotal evidence of women's bathrooms being a shitshow, and all the incontinence and period products obviously resembling diapers, and there will be questions about it. There will be a significantly large conspiracy movement which deny that women were ever regularly potty-trained in society, and believe that evidence to the contrary was fabricated. Then they'll look at the evidence in their own society and it will just seem to make sense as women have been kept in diapers and treated like children for as long as anyone can remember and the thought of a woman being able to potty-train does seem a little silly when you get right down to it. You read history books about how there was this one dark period in history for just over a hundred years where women were allowed to vote and hold positions in society equal to or over male counterparts, and then you'll just look over to the kitchen where your pretty young wife is wearing nothing but a thick baby-printed Pampers while she squats down on the tile floor, a look of serious strain and concentration on her face, as she fills her overly thick diapers to the brim, and then you'll just smirk and look back at the history book thinking. "Yeah, there's no way that ever happened."

I would love to turn my girlfriend into a cute, submissive, dumb diaper girl

>>39536 You could try laxatives or just anal sex till they need diapers?

>>39541 Considering we're headed for a WW3 it feels this could become a biproduct of the failure of feminism. Men tired of all the the shit about women demanding equality but acting like babies when they need to take responsibility will take the matter into their own hands and put women in their place back where they belong.

>>39769 woah there, tone it down

>>39772 Where do you think you are right now? Look at this thread. >>39769 With any luck after the chaos we're looking at a glorious diapered future.

Rejoice anons for the day of the stroller is nearly upon us! Soon there will be a course correction that will fix a societal mistake over a hundred years in the making! From the ashes of the old a glorious padded reich will take form!

>women get to live my fantasy, getting diapered and forced into babyhood >I have to look from the sidelines as they giggle and play, meanwhile I'm forced to be the daddy of some newly regressed little Sounds like a nightmare. Give me something that would allow me to join in the fun at least.

>>39808 I REALLY like seeing women in diapers but for me at least the important part is just that they get subjugated to a subservient role. That could look like a bunch of girls wearing nothing but overly thick diapers rolling around on the floor, drooling on themselves, or it could look like women being relegated to a proper 1950s housewife role, where their duties include feeding me meals and wiping my ass. Preferably would still like to see them in diapers in that scenario though.

>>39808 You sound like a femboi that wants to be turned into an anime girl.

>enforced female babyhood it's implemented >women that form resistance groups are quickly defeated and forced into their new role >there's also men participating into this groups >this is unacceptable >an exemplar punishment must be implemented for such cases >they're forced to share the same fate as their female counterparts, and since they like women so much they get to be one too >forced babyhood and feminization for traitors >they get the worst punishments in the conversion facilities >eventually the punishment is extended for other forms of dissidence like speaking against the regime or being "insufficiently manly" >as time goes on the standards for being manly get higher, causing more men to fall into forced infancy and feminization to the point 10% of men get fembyfied as it's called >they become sort of an item. Having a failed male makes you look more manly after all

>>39811 what? No, not at all. I just want to wear diapers, and it's kind of a bummer that I don't get to and women do. I just want a way to join them, but that doesn't mean I want to be an anime girl or anything like that. I mean, if that's the only way I get to experience babyhood I suppose I would consider it, but it's not my first option.

Diapers should be the punishment for any kind of rebellion You didn't want to do chores? Diaper punishment You disobeyed? Diaper punishment Humiliation until they break their minds and become submissive

I believe many in this thread are fundamentally misguided. Diapers and motherhood do not mix; we require mothers to continue the species, but if we require our mothers to be padded, mating will cease, as the paternal instinct will kick in and stop proper reproduction. After all, everyone knows a true baby should be doted on and guided by a strong, caring hand. Men are obviously the strength, but women are the only ones who posses true caring; not girls, not men. The real solution is a caste system of women: one to nurture and love, and the other to cuddle and pet. It is my dream that every man can find a beautiful maternal woman to help take care of his properly regressed little girl. The little girls are easy to spot already: they're the uppity, spoiled, infirm ones you see on "Instagram" and "Tik Tok". Truly mature women are just as common, but are often less visible due to their respectable nature. We must institute maturity tests for women to determine which caste they fall in, and then properly assign the little girls to loving couples where they can be safe. Obviously, there will not be enough little girls for every man. Therefore, I suggest the highly controversial practice of terminating male pregnancies (as early as possible) until the gender ratio is appropriate to make sure our sons will have one partner and one little girl. Other solutions are possible, but I feel this is the most humane. Every poll shows this is the most popular option.

>>39820 >Soyboy collaborators sharing the same fate as women I see nothing wrong with this. We can finally encourage men to be men again! The question is is the PID implemented? >>39827 With women that pretty much means diapered 24/7 regardless. >>39830 What about machines and artificial wombs though?

>>39842 >>39820 >Insufficiently masculine men get femmified and babied Surgical and hormonal modifications too of course.

>>39820 >>39830 >Having a dedicated 'mommy' caste Yes. I agree with this

>>39885 Of course of course but it depends on the owner's preference. In the most extreme cases, the failed male will undergo complete nullification surgery. Some will be left with just a hole down there but many will be given cute and puffy vaginal appearance. Of course, this is purely cosmetic and non-functional since the nu-baby has no need for sexual organs or sexual pleasure. Other owners will simply feed their failed-male a cocktail of hormones until their cocks shrink and shrivel away, hanging useless and limp between the failed male's legs and never getting hard again. Many owners prefer this because it serves as a constant reminder of the nu-baby's failure as a man and often is more humiliating than actual nullification. Some owners will even tease the failed male with promises to let them free if they make cummies, which the owners know is completely impossible but they're amused watching their failed-male try in vain.

>>39889 Are you suggesting that after they get femmified and babied they are then enslaved?

>>39917 Enslave, adopt, foster, whatever the hell you want to call it the end result is the same. The failed male is stripped of his adult human rights and placed under the care of his new owner/parent/etc.And this doesn't always happen before the enslavement, some owners really enjoy that feminization/babying training period.Some are feminized/infantilized by their new owners and others are feminized/infantilized by the government agency that deemed them unfit to be male in the first place before being given to their new owners.

>>39918 You know there is a risk right that these new "gurls" are probably going to spending so much time getting buttfucked by horny owners they're going to need diapers permanently without the need for medication or surgery?

>>39923 Not to be too attention seeking, but I wish someone would do this to me and we're not even in the diaper fascist world.

I fear this thread is straying too far towards a sissification mindset and not the wholesome misogyny on which our ideas are founded.

Modern femininity is having a glass of red wine to celebrate your latest purchase of a 'live love laugh' sign whilst absolutely filling your diaper to max

>>39936 Yes. Sissies are an inseparable part of ABDL culture, sure, but let’s not stray far from the topic: actual women. Ideally, I don’t want anything to do with sissies. Interpret that however you want. Women need to be subjugated and kept in their place for their own good. They WANT to be controlled and they WANT someone to tell them what to do. Even the ones who would deny it or otherwise convey themselves as independent and full of their own willpower. It’s a façade. Force her into diapers and treat her like a child.. and she’ll show you who, or what, rather, she really is.

>>39936 >>39976 The sissy question will need to be addressed eventually along with anyone else who would sabotage the vision of the glorious padded reich! Though going back to the role of women there is debate about how do we maintain healthy human stock? Is there a caste system introduced where there is a class of female considered mature enough to act as a matriarch and thus breed? How do we separate the immature from those with desirable genes, do we do something like the PID for females? Perhaps we remove the role of women in breeding altogether and go for artificial wombs and thus they all become babbling babs?

>>39982 >how do we maintain healthy human stock? Assuming artifical wombs and genetic engineering can't happen I always just figured people would keep reproducing normally. I mean in this scenario men would be much more inclined to spread their seed as much as they wanted anyway. Have the government mandate that population levels stay at a point where we get replacement or growth levels of males, and a higher number of females, so that every man can have a harem of diapered women or caretakers if he so pleases.

>>39982 Artificial wombs would be the ideal choice. Creating castes gives them the idea that they can be anything more than what they are. Keep them in their place, their only place.

>>40220 Not a preg or breeding fetishist but IDK if biological reproduction should totally be taken away. After all, it's not really about whether or not women should be allowed to reproduce, it's really about what MEN want and accommodating that. If some men in this ideal future want to creampie their diaperwives on the changing table and then a few months later have them waddling around with a pregnancy belly and a full diaper, that should be up to the man.

women be like; i only pee a little when i sneeze, cough, laugh, get up too quick, sit down too quick, get surprised, do yoga and drink a little but im NOT a baby and DONT need diapers

>>40250 It's the old debate about genetics and whether controlling it will not only ensure a healthy gene pool but a healthy society. >>40274 Frankly its only a matter of time till companies start targeting them as a demographic. The next question that could be had is the role of machines and AI in such a society. One wonders how far are we off such a thing as "nannybots" in this world?

>>40359 the concept of a poorly programmed nannybot overreacting to the tiniest bit of stress incontinence and fully babying an adult woman over it is so hot

>>40362 >Poorly programmed Don't you mean correctly programmed?

>>39982 >How to maintain human population Dedicated 'Mommy' and 'Sitter' caste of the strongest/smartest/most capable women Basically the same way we sissify sub-standard males. Basically 'Brave New World' Alpha/Beta/Delta/Gamma system except with diapers

So how do we start the fire? With a machine uprising perhaps?

>>40992 Anything that takes away women's rights is a step in the right direction.