>>31923 I honestly expect nothing but what AI has gotten us for art: ungodly awful to mediocre shit, and proof that not everyone can be an artist. Besides, I cannot imagine someone having to edit and re-edit their prompts for a 60 second video at 60 fps. That's 3600 separate image generations that build on each other.

>>31991 Agreed, AI art already needs a lot of hand holding and heavy editing to produce an end result without obvious flaws no human artist would do (like merging objects and features into each other or screwing up hands badly to the point of confusing them with feet at times) because an AI art algorithm has no actual understanding of what things should look like to a human or what it's actually creating. Now multiply that problem by every frame in something animated, plus the issues unique to animation that still art doesn't have. There's already some examples of AI animation easy to search and it has a serious problem with consistency between frames. It ends up looking like an acid trip of objects with shifting textures morphing into other objects.