>>282037
your phenotype appears white at first glance, but you have admitted that your family tree contains a 'chug', which is a mongoloid from east siberia. you're 'basically white' in the sense that the admixture is small and unlikely to affect your personality, maybe 1/32nd or so depending on how many generations ago that was, but you're not pure and I wouldn't let you near any daughter of mine
me, on the other hand, my ancestry is wholly European. the worst you can say is that there is 0.1% North African from some Berber 'New Christian'- which is still quite racially similar, Caucasoid, just Hamitic instead of Aryan. I'm objectively whiter than you, even if my pigmentation is darker due to my predominately southern European phenotype.
if you consult this German race scientist map, I'm 99.9% Arier, 0.1% Hamiten- 100% Kaukasische (with 0% Semiten). you are probably like 96.875% Arier/Kaukasische, 3.125% Amerikaner/Mongolische. in what universe does having yellowish hair change these mathematical facts? I'm pretty high percentile for Neanderthal blood also, I have a thicc brow ridge, relatively large ribcage...
neither of us are 'beaners', but you're a Squanto, which is precisely the problem with beaners... if the Mexicans were pure Spanish then they would be just as white as the old Americans and I'd have no problem with them coming in in reasonable numbers as long as they learned English. but that's obviously not the case, they're like half Aztec on average