>>412528
I'm not Mexican, I'm just sexually attracted to Mexican women. I don't really want Mexoids flooding the US, BUT if that means they'll carve off that 'Aztlan reconquest' then that would obviously be a good thing because it would make the USA (enemy of mankind) weaker. 'some plain old latin american shithole' is a much less harmful employment of the territory than 'Jevvish battering ram enforcing global Z0G agenda'
some (probably >50% spanish-descendent) beaners doing landscaping then going home to eat tamales and fuck their chubby wives to make them stop talking so fast and pop out more Diegos and Marias is a lot less harmful than some (plurality britoid-mutt-descendent) evangelical g0yim with a high GDP per capita due to protestant cuck wagie "work ethic" that support political candidates that pump up the US economy, its military spending, and lsrael vs candidates that support benefits to drain the system... which of these demographics is giving the US its strength, and which is causing its decline? which of those two is actually preferable? I think I just think harder than you do. I don't care about the retarded and obese fluoride-slurping 'White Americans', I only care about actual Europeans, who do not have a future without the recession of US hegemony. that's why I think people should boycott "Made in USA" and intentionally buy things "Made in China"- you're voting with your wallet for gentilekind every time you do that
>>412533
I have 43.75% British ancestry. have never been there though