>>3042 Both men and women can have ugly or attractive penis/vagina. It's genetics.

>>3414 Most women have unattractive vaginas. An unattractive vagina is essentially the default. A typical dick is just normal looking, ignoring the fact that most of them are mangled from involuntary genital mutilation.

I forgot how cringe the start of this thread was.

>>3415 To be fair, nobody ever says primary sex characteristics are attractive. It's always the secondary ones, it's why guys look at tits and asses and girls look at muscles.

>>2548 >>2557 >>2559 He's just so perfect, honestly I don't even care that much about Ladybug all I want is to see more of Chat Noir

>>3908 based cat enjoyer

>>3909 How can one boy be so fucking perfect just to be stuck on such an average kid show? Guess I shouldn't even be surprised, Ladybug is filled with wasted opportunity.

>>3959 Many such cases.

>>3959 whats so bad about that

Which one of you fags is pictured here: https://archive.ph/ko9Ly

>>4061 https://fixupx.com/i/status/1873772390813229389

Sorry I wasn't there in IRC to answer your questions, Board Owner. As far as I understood, I thought I was not breaking the rules listed by having an IRC thread. I'm not aware of any means of contact aside from this board itself and the channel. Perhaps we can politely discuss this? I am open to whatever you want to do.

Effective immediately I am assuming control of this board. The plan is simple, more cute boys, less drama. Here's to a new year.

>>4116 >removing rules that prevent trannies shitting up the place Not that it makes a difference since this site will forever be dead regardless.

>>4118 Trannies never shat this place up, that was just kazus personal vendetta. Something I personally have no interest in prosecuting.

>>4119 >Trannies never shat this place up Because they board never acquired any users in the first place. Obviously a dead site and board didn't need to deal with people shitting it up. >that was just kazus personal vendetta No it wasn't. It was a rule made the moment the board was created, and wasn't by "Kazu". At least know the actual history of the board before making random shit up. Like I said, none of this matters because this place is even more dead than it was during the first couple years. But the rule was in place because the original /cuteboys/ board on 8chan prime, as well as basically any "femboy" oriented community on the internet, become filled with trannies calling themselves femboys while they destroy their bodies with hormones so they can pursue their AGP fetish while they are young.

>>4120 You are a negative nancy my friend, well instead of complaining how about we post in the various threads? Life doesn't come from nowhere.

>>4121 Criticism != complaining. And I didn't even imply this board or its BO's were necessarily responsible for it being dead. You just have shit reading comprehension.

>>4123 Your criticism is we need a no trannies rule because they will shit up the board. I hear you, I just don't think its an issue, but hey if it is I'll deal with it, and as far as criticizing the BO goes... Go for it. I just took over last night. I have no pride in psyches work.

>>4124 It's obviously not an issue because no one knows this site even exists. As BO you're free to do whatever you want. You could even argue that doing some big advertising campaign and letting trannies on here would result in more general activity and "save" the board from irrelevancy. Though I seriously doubt anyone here would ever accomplish something like that. I don't really care that much. But the rule was not in place because one of your retarded gvol namefags had a "vendetta". If that board had any sort of existing userbase I would probably be significantly more critical because boards and their culture exist beyond whatever the scope of any individual BO might want. But in this case I'll just call you gay.

>>4125 Well excuse me but no, first of all kaz was a human being, not just a selfless volunteer, also he was my friend. Please don't be a dick to kaz. Thank you. Second of all, if he was the only one here from prime who remembered this vendetta, and actively prosecuted it, would that not in effect make it his own personal vendetta? And second the boards actually always had more activity than it appears, the element group was the biggest part of that iceberg. With that gone there's now an IRC group, which is active as shit. So I thank you for time, but you are incorrect on several factual points.

>>4126 >Well excuse me but no, first of all kaz was a human being, not just a selfless volunteer, also he was my friend. Please don't be a dick to kaz. Thank you. I don't care. All namefags are retarded. >Second of all, if he was the only one here from prime who remembered this vendetta, and actively prosecuted it, would that not in effect make it his own personal vendetta? I don't even think he changed a single rule when he claimed the board. The only way you would know that he personally felt strongly about it would be talking to him in private. So, no? You seem to be under the impression that he developed the basic ruleset you changed, he didn't. >And second the boards actually always had more activity than it appears, the element group was the biggest part of that iceberg. Private chat rooms do not count as board activity you retarded nigger, holy fuck. >With that gone there's now an IRC group, which is active as shit. Ah yes, the key to a quality board. Siphoning all of the users into chat rooms instead of actually using the fucking board. You're a fucking idiot dude.

>>4127 No, I just have a different philosophy than you. See the board exists as a porn dump, as every other porn board, but with the chatroom you funnel all the pointless bickering away from the board, leading to a slower but steadier board. You see it as dead, whereas it has ever been anything but. You speak on the history of THIS board, and yet know nothing about it. Now you may disagree with this philosophy, but I ask you. How many boards have you run? Is your opinion theoretical? Or practical? It matters.

>>4128 >See the board exists as a porn dump Because no one uses it for discussion since you funneled it all away into chatrooms. >leading to a slower but steadier board No, it led to a dead board. >You see it as dead, whereas it has ever been anything but. Nope, it's definitely fucking dead. The fact you think discussion is something that ought to be actively encouraged to move away from an imageboard is a very clear demonstration of your "philosophy". And why the board will continue to remain "steady". You're also omitting the fact that 80% of the posts in the matrix room is just porn dumping that could easily be done here but is instead done there. Almost as if having a bunch of people circlejerking in private chat rooms isn't conducive to creating a good imageboard. Keep deflecting with disingenuous babble though. I'm sure you'll gaslight at least some of the zero people observing this conversation.

>>4129 And you claim to not be a negative nancy, tsk tsk. Anon this facade is very amusing and all, but c'mon. What's your agenda here?

>>4130 I have no agenda. As I said, if someone were to think that being less strict with the rules would open up the board to my activity that would be perfectly logical. I would probably ideologically disagree with it, but would at least make sense and produce some sort of intended result. But instead you just say obviously incorrect bullshit while making passive aggressive remarks. There are perspective that can be disagreed with while still making some sort of sense. Your "perspective" on the other hand is just fucking brain dead. Funneling users off of a board is obviously bad for the boards quality and activity. So I suppose that's my agenda, for people to use imageboards? What a bizarre thing to campaign for, if you ask me. Can't say why I would be of that opinion.

>>4131 But you dont use the imageboard. You specifically declined thirty minutes ago to do just that, now you say you have no agenda, but I thought this was a criticism? But you have no point? Therefore... You are here to complain. GOTO 10

>>4132 Yeah you caught me. There's no fooling you.

>>4133 I mean your picture to word ratio is ridiculous, even the picture to post index is alarming. Anon you are a forum user. For shame. Now lets go pointlessly argue WHILE POSTING PICTURES THAT ARE HOPEFULLY AT LEAST SLIGHTLY TO THE TOPIC OF THE POST in the thread designated for that. This is the meta thread, its more for just "Hey BO this thing is an issue" so I can say "Lol your wrong". Like one and done. But hey I'll take the pph. Anyways theres a discussion thread sir. I shall meet you there. I'll be the guy avatarfagging as kaz

>>4134 As all seasoned imageboard users know, people never use meta threads to criticize BO's. I'm clearly way out of my depth here with how expertly you're exposing my ignorance of imageboard culture.

>>4136 But you already said you dont have a criticism. Sir this is not the complaint thread. That thread fell off the catalog because I never once looked at it.

I'm debating a custom CSS, thoughts?

>>4143 Keep it normal, yotsuba.

>>4143 What exactly did you have in mind?

I just come for the 2D content

>>4183 Kewl. We do have some.