>>40484 Man I would love for the lily outfit mod to be updated with carol's new face.

>>41057 >Andy Okay, that got me.

>>41061 >Hags don't pay for sex >(uh uh) >I pay for sex! >(with sex)

From: https://allthefallen.moe/forum/index.php?threads/onirism-lewd-plugin-general-modding-suite-asset-injector-asset-creation-toolset.30117/page-99#post-20766286 I'm finishing up my rewrite for the Accessory plugin. Here's a list of new features: I've managed to separate out all of the OLP dependencies, so that it can be used without the OLP at all, for the weirdos that don't want any lewd content. Custom outfits now work during all cutscenes, including the ones where she was forced into her pajamas before. CarolBots now spawn wearing one of your saved outfits. You can now name and save your clothing combinations, and save multiple combinations. Saves are stored in a Recipes folder in your Onirism directory, and can be loaded through an in-game UI. Meshes with multiple material slots now support all materials being replaced. Multiple faces can be active at once. Idk why anyone would want this lol, but it's a nice side effect of some other optimizations. Carol pulls out her phone when you open the outfit menu (rn this only works when OLP isn't active). All outfits are always unlocked. Performance is improved, a lot of optimizations have been made with bone and mesh management. Maybe other stuff I'm forgetting, idk lol i've been working on this for like a month. Added new bugs.

>>42264 Nice.

>>30630 This. Controversial material with plausible deniability for the developers has been a recipe for getting a bunch of free advertisement since the Dragon's Lair came out. The only way that the devs will be fucked is if they actively try to stop people from modding it and from playing the modded versions. They will not get forgiven by the shrieking moral crusaders, and the fans will drop the game completely.

>>43702 What was controversial in Dragon's Lair? Daphne, an adult, being a little too sexy?

>>43734 Daphne's model having been a Playboy model. Back before Disney did that with their princesses it was a minor controversy. 1983 was when The Christian Coalition was active and trying to censor all the bad things.

>>46075 That's great art, but the mouth needs some finishing.

>>48487 Cannot wait to watch all the reviews when the game comes out.

>>48498 Will they be able to dance around the undeniable issue of the game's most dedicated fans being a bunch of pedophiles? Will they even try to avoid the subject or attack the game on that basis? Guys, how about we try to not be too noticeable upon release? Or at least, let's shill it with the spaghetti still in our pockets? Maybe keep all the cunny on the down-low?

>>48499 Nice self report

>>48523 Would work on a different board. Remember where we are?

>>48530 Kek, inb4 he angrily replies with some variation of "loli is not the same thing as pedo."

>>48534 I would say it is not a perfect 1 to 1. Kind of like the people who'd fuck Nala from Lion King are not NECESSARILY the same people who wish they'd fuck real lions.

>>48534 >Kek, inb4 he angrily replies with some variation of "killing in video games is not the same as killing IRL"

>>48547 That's a false equivalence. It should be >Everyone who kills in videogames has the potential to being a killer IRL. Which it's kind of true. The military knows it too well.

>>48546 I should ask /zoo/ if anyone who would fuck IRL lions would not fuck Nala from The Lion King. Stand by.

>>48546 Maybe not lions for obvious reasons, but I doubt any furry would refuse to fuck a siberian Husky

>>48557 Methinks you got it backwards.

>>50243 Beware the bugs.