Last one:

Louis Caravaque - Child tsesarevna Elizaveta Petrovna

Are statues allowed ?

>>51478 I would imagine so.

Edgar Valter

Edgar Valter This book is difficult to find but looks interesting.

>>51454 >>45125 I was trying to figure out who the 4th picture was by but I couldn’t decipher the signature. The style looked very familiar so I went through the whole thread and I just figured out it’s based on (or traced from) a Gertrude Thomson fairy.

>>51563 I would like to find that

>>51788 If you do scan it and post it here.

Probably better to expand the thread to pre-1980s and also create a contemporary art thread.

>>52637 Looks like the girl with the German soldier doll is part of a series.

2 Swedish artists, Carl Larsson, late 19th century and John Bauer, early 20th century

>>50867 Who did the first one here?

It's too bad that it was tradition not to draw, paint, or sculpt the cleft of venus so most of the paintings and drawings from before the 20th century are smooth around the bend. Especially the ones that were drawn as art art instead of just pornographic illustrations.

>>53065 the problem with that is that in europe in past (till the millenia) visible genitalia in public was not accepted (like the same with pubes in japan), during the 90's there was a big step forward in that so that even a fully visible vulva was acceptable to show in public (altho still not in every european country)... during the 70's it was very prominent, cuz artists found a way to show erotic, but without getting labeled as pornographic - they simply drew or added a gigantic bush to the girls, whic actually was á la mode that time anyway... so leaving out the cleft of venus is more a way for those artists to be able to show their art in museum, which is public available in europe... - it's complicated... but it got better... novadays we even have "open public" erotic exhibitions... so even children can actually look at erotic art... the definition of pornography got changed rapidly during the past few decades, so in europe the nude body doesnt even count as offensive anymore - only when it comes to the actual visible sexual act or detailed sexual organs in arrousing state it is considered pornographic... thats why you can easily see nudes in free tv here with guys dicks hanging out or girls sunbathing with spread legs, but never be able to see them having sex...

>>53069 It's just puzzling considering all those reasons that many artists elected to do a full frontal shot of nothing instead of a discretionary side shot or the ever popular stray draped ribbon.

>>53073 i wanna try to explain this to you from an artists point of view... i really think the old artists had to consider the same ;) "if" you are an artist and you love the female form then you try everything to show it, even if it means drawing the void... but drawing something over it or simply changing the pose is probably the least favorite option an artist takes... i myself rather would draw the front blank, than drawing something over it if it means i can show a girl nude...

found on a collectors place for postcards

>>53049 I wish I knew. I know the picture is an album cover, but I haven’t been able to find a credit for the art.

>>53049 was not hard to find... artist is matti kota stuff is even on youtube! - why the fuck is a cover of a topless child on YOUTUBE?!!! - such bastards! (i mean youtube)

>>53142 >but I haven’t been able to find a credit for the art. 7min google cross search >.>

>>51141 Who made these? Are there more sets?

[Ruvanti] Divina Erotica [Dutch] https://exhentai.org/g/1043487/2a4cd363f1/?p=1