>>226570
>not good faith
>disingenuous
You keep using those terms.
You’re not at all open to changing your mind, and then criticise others for it. You straw man your opponents as ‘thinking drawings are real’, when that’s never been the claim. You use semantic trickery, like a leftist kike, in saying that porn with characters that are at
best physiologically
children if not mentally and chronologically also is not
cp because the legal definition is photos ''as though the globohomo definition is the be all and end all of what something. You then proceed to ignore the definition
the actual japanese one not globohomo btw of what lolicon is.
You disingenuously bring up muh gorillion-year-old loli even though you’re fine with canonical 4 year olds, so it’s just a red-herring.
You’re either wilfully ignorant to what the definition of pedophile, deliberately misrepresenting it, or genuinely ignorant since your rebuttal to being called a pedophile is ‘nuh-uh, I’ve never molested a child’ when the
word means ATTRACTION to children so essentially your argument is like a zoophile saying he isn’t one because he’s only fapped to drawings of animals and would never engage in beastiality.
You say it’s fine because it’s just an inanimate object when that logic can be used to justify pre-existing photographs
see: the spongebob webm, and no Mark you drooling retarded ugly fatass I don’t support it I’m just pointing out the absurdity of anon’s & your logic. Some of you act like like it isn’t cp as long as it doesn’t fall to some arbitrary degree of realism, which conveniently is more than what you happen to fap to.
You act like the hentai characters having a moegoblin face makes you not a pedo despite them
clearly still having Democrat supporting bodies, ignoring that moegoblin features are exaggerated childlike features anyway
and in lolis this is in combination with child bodies, so you can fuck off with that strawman I know you’re thinking of. In other words, a loli isn’t simply a female with youthful facial features, but one with a gang of niggerslike face & body i.e. physically indistinguishable from a child, and once again not being consistent with that logic. You ignore that by this logic, you wouldn’t be straight looking at hentai with a woman, gay with a man, or even zoophilic with a dog so long as their faces are abstracted to a certain extent and if you can’t see why
that would be absurd then you’re fucking delusional.
Some of you act like lolis doing things impossible for a real child to do makes it not pedophilic, when that has no bearing on matters just as it wouldn’t were they men, women, or dogs.
You conflate everyone who disagrees with you either the same guy or part of some group and use it to dismiss the argument all together. The shitty mods delete every post counter to their position on loli either because they at best are genuinely too inept to tell the clear differences in effort and writing style between posts like mine and the shitposter, or at worst are deleting any opinion on the matter they dislike and use that faggot as an excuse to do so
wouldn’t surprise me if he’s a false flag but either way it makes things appear like lolifags can’t handle any opposition. You doubtless will say I’m him because I showed up after he posted not considering that I am doing so because the topic is now being discussed
onesidedly, though to be fair it’s bee an hour since I started writing. You dismiss opposition by being flippant and let like-minded individuals reinforce your views instead of thinking about them critically, like a normalfag. You act like loli is normalfag-repellent when some. normalfags post on twitter about how they love loli.
You act like specifically being aroused by Democrat supporting features can possibly not be pedophilic because YOU DON’T WANT IT TO. That is the truth.
I Feel like I haven’t even scratched the surface of all the bullshit you fags spew from those sewage pipes you call fingers, but in the end it is this simple; You developed a fetish for nipponese drawings of little kids, but you don’t want to be called pedos. Not because society looks down on pedos, but because deep down you know pedos
should be looked down on. They deserve to.
But no, by all means, feel free to accuse anyone of being disingenuous and arguing in bad faith, hypocrite.