>>259849
>This will never actually replace the human imagination as humans have and always will come up with something outside the box that doesn't fit convention
Which also applies to prompts.
>The AI needs to steal from others to make things while I or another artist can visualise something and create something truly new
You legitimately have zero clue how AI image generation works if you don't think it can generate completely new images.
>I understand you want to paint (insert Carlos here) this picture of how artist are done or not needed in a massive compacity but it's simply untrue.
No I don't. I have gone out of my way to state that I explicitly don't want that to be true. You're just fixated on assuming I have some agenda when in reality you're just being obtuse.
>I've given you points it's just you don't want to acknowledge them.
I have acknowledged every single point you've brought up without fail. Now you're just trying to revise the conversation in real time.
>Ah there we go the mask finally slips.
And now you've found your invitation to pretend like you're only just now disengaging from the conversation when really you did it 2 posts ago.
Man anons are fucking exhausting to interact with. It's like talking to emotionally stunted teenagers. I don't know why I keep coming here. Even normalniggers are more interesting at this point.