>>82431
>>82440
>he's talking about lowering child mortality rates correlating with people having less children.
>Microjew boy is talking about increasing quality of life for subhumans in third world countries and thus stunting their birth rates.
>Generally speaking yes. Poverty and high infant mortality correlate with high birth rates.
>there are measures that can be taken that have invariable effects on how societies operate.
>It isn't a matter of debate whether or not decreasing infant mortality influences birth rates, it does.
The first fucking thing they teach you about researching anything is that correlation does not equal causation. As the other fag has pointed, the primary contributors to the overpopulation of the world are India, China, and Africa, with sky high birth rates. These places are not totally without technology and massive quality of life improvements over recent decades, in fact, one of them is a world superpower, and if their huge birthrates were solely the result of high mortality rates, then things would balance out, not continue to have an overpopulation boom for decades upon decades. There's two easy explanations in layman's terms why improving quality of life doesn't guarantee lower birth rates. Firstly, there's culture. While high birthrates originate in high mortality rates due to evolution, they don't simply go away with it. The culture of having many children is deeply ingrained. Caucasian countries had quality of life improvements that lowered mortality rates over the course of hundreds of years, not a few decades. At the very Caucasians had much more time to adapt to these changes than most other groups. Secondly, instinct and racial differences. People like fucking, and subhumans simply don't give a fuck and will continue to follow their instincts regardless of quality of life improvements.