>>3398 Either you're a delusional lefty or you're lucky enough to have never gotten in an argument with a lefty.

>>3387 no it's not but I meant child love

>>3400 Tests put me centrist leaning libertarian and yes I have gotten into arguments with authoritarian lefties who didn't even know they were. Doesn't change the fact that a diagram showing the differences between the political sides can't have a descriptor that can just as easily apply to both sides.

>>3408 That's because the differences don't exist. The left side of the compass might as well be two authoritarian squares.

>>3410 Are you saying its impossible for anyone on the progressive side of the political spectrum to believe in small government? That everyone outside of the right wants to be ruled by a dictator?

>>3420 "progressive" is just code for statist cultist obsessed with equality of outcome and other shit that's impossible in a small government free market type society, niggers would fail and trannies would die and no one would care.

>>3422 Yeah the authoritarian left are the ones that want government enforced diversity quotas and shit like that. But the libertarian left will fight for things like the right for women to give abortions and not have their bodily autonomy decided by the state. Abortion is obvious a progressive issue yet it doesn't require big government like you seem to think everything progressive does.

>>3429 >killing babies is progress you're thinking of kikes

>>3433 Yes, abortion was seen as an immoral act and no longer is, just as faggotry was seen as an immoral act and no longer is, these are progressive issues.

>>3435 killing babies is not like consensual sex actually nothing at all like it kill yourself

>>3436 Abolishing slavery was progressive, creating the age of consent was progressive, letting trannies cut their dick off was progressive, how you feel on these subjects is irrelevant.

>>3437 spout more nonsense

>>3440 You'd have to say something of substance first so I have something to work with but I'm not about to hold my breath on that.

>>3444 >random thing is label that's so substantial what does progressive mean to you why is 'being progressive' valuable? off yourself brainlet

>>3448 I can't believe I have to explain basic fucking political terms to you. Progressives think the way things are now aren't good enough and want them to change for what they believe is the better, conservatives want to maintain the status quo and not deviate from what has worked in the past. Is that not self evident to you? Also I never claimed that being progressive is valuable, where did that even come from?

>>3453 Your political lens is fucking stupid. Conservatives want to suck Israeli dick, progressives want to kill babies. Those are their whole platforms, catch up retard.

>>3456 And your political lens is painfully focused on america with no concept of whats going on in the wider world.

>>3457 Coming from a retard that actually uses progressive and conservative unironically.

>>3463 They perfectly describe the opposing ideologies in how societies should be run, I'd ask what you would refer to them as but I know it'll just be a totally vacuous statement that doesn't provide any value to the discussion so theres really no point.

>>3469 If you must be extremely asshurt about being retarded. It's not my fault.

>>3422 You have got to be the dumbest gorilla nigger here

>>3564 Not an argument.

>>3620 Then here's the definition of the word "progressive": >Progressive ideas or systems are new and modern, encouraging change in society or in the way that things are done: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/progressive Abolishing the age-of-consent is a progressive idea. Dismantling the Federal Reserve is a progressive idea. Withdrawing U.S. support of Israel and crippling them with embargos is a progressive idea. "Progressive" does not mean "evil" or "leftist" or any of the things your political bias wants it to mean just because your political enemies choose to call themselves "progressive". Hint, most of them aren't "liberal", either. There's an argument, you dumb gorilla nigger.

>>4423 Not how it's used by anyone that matters, cope brainlet.

>>4423 the thing is, the very notion of progress is a spook, a total myth with zero basis in reality it's like how many people fallaciously think evolution is somehow progressing and working towards certain goals, whereas it's just a continuous process of natural selection there really is no such thing as progress, only change so no, none of those ideas are progressive at all they are called progressive by people who want to make it out as if there is such a thing as progress, and that their specific ideas are the progressive ones, but this is just a massively failed attempt at virtue signalling and moralfaggotry the other anon never said that he thought "progressive" meant "evil" or "leftist", and that's really just a pathetic straw man on your part, that anon just recognizes what I just said, namely that there is no such thing as progress, and that people who call themselves progressive or support what they call progressive ideas are delusional and/or deceptive

>>2377 >>2506 nice...

Authleft: Lolis are oppressed and we want sexenings with hot lolis of christcucks and conservatives Authright: Sex with lolis is traditional and aryan. Agree or DIE. Libleft: Pedosexual is a valid sexuality. Libright: The age of consent is easily shown to be bullshit. Lolis can decide for themselves what they want without state/bydlo propaganda. Current wectern regime: We're jealous of pedos and white male nerds. We are going to hatefully oppress and imprison them while funneling white lgs to nigtoids and mudslime. We also won't attack the wealthy elite or white male teen pindicks for wasting lolis and ruining whole generations of them. We side with bydlo and white niggers against high iq, since high iq aren't self-aware and are outnumbered by #Metoo leftist pseudo-pretenders. If you don't want to annihilate the current regime described above there's something wrong with you.

>>4423 >Abolishing the age-of-consent is a progressive idea isn't that just going back?

>>6722 No, it isn't. All societies that could be by any stretched called civilized had the norm that you fuck someone sexually mature, but not before said maturity happens. You really think certain traditions aren't ancient?

>>6737 Historically illiterate retard. Marriages (non-arranged and arranged both) occured before puberty hit basically right up until feminists campaigned against it, greece had an entire culture around pederasty, and before christkikes nobody was ashamed of themselves over sex so children were free to experiment (as they do even today, because the urge is that strong).

The past 10000 years were all arranged toddler marriage and if you say otherwise you're a jew.

>>6737 in islam your partner has to be at least 9 to have sex but rubbing etc is allowed even with a baby obviously you have to be married to do those things but the point is by abolishing aoc we aren't getting more rights than people had in the past (and some still have) >>6742 they were rare but they happened. even if arranged child marriages were still legal they wouldn't be common now either

>>6749 >rubbing etc is allowed even with a baby Feminism is a cancer, Islam is the answer.

Libertarian Right.

>Where do you stand Right above the Jew's neck

>>2377 Top right. God said so.