>>6069
>Call me crazy, I don't care, but I think minor-attracted people, then zoophiles, and then other paraphilics are going to be the new "oppressed minorities" in the future.
I'll disagree with this point, only to the fact that the LGBT community managed to dominate the culture over the course of several decades in Western society. This took years of changing definitions and explaining how words like "fag" are offensive, to normalizing LGBT sexualities with a libertarian-esque cause, leading to the gay overton window. "We just want the right to marry," or "who cares what two consenting adults do in their bedroom" would quickly turn into arguments about who can operate their business how they see fit, are gays an oppressed minority, what types of public and private spaces like bathrooms need to change, and much more. And people 'want' these changes because they either fit into that category or they want to feel as if they are taking part in a revolution. They have gotten to a point where not only is gay marriage legalized, but now you have some of them complaining about "Rainbow Washing," when a corporation like Starbucks or Blizzard brands their logo with a rainbow but has no history of donating to LGBT causes. "It's not good enough." Long story short, I don't see any way for the pro-pedo crowd to win because they have not won the culture war like the blacks or the gays have.
<What can we do against the Antis to win the culture war, then?
I'm not a /hebe/, but I'm also not a radical Anti that wants people dead or raped in slave labor dungeons known as the American Prison-Industrial complex. I've always had this question as to why beautiful images of young boys fully nude were perfectly acceptable hundreds of years ago, thousands if you consider the symbolism - but are now problematic. From the 'amorino' (little cupid boy) being present in mythic and religious art, to sculptures prominently centering on his penis such as the 'puer mingens'. Some of my favorite paintings are by artists like Joaquín Bastida. His work was mostly done outside, meaning over just 100 years ago, it was perfectly acceptable for boys to swim naked in Spanish beaches with or without their parents supervision. These images capture a childlike youth and innocence that can't be captured with the restrictions of helicopter parenting and modern property law. Of course some countries like France still have family nude beaches, but they are changing with the times. It's frustrating, because anyone today who wants to tell a story or create art with nudity of children will be accused of the worst of evils, even if his 'intention' was for the good. On one hand, I know there are plenty of passionate people (myself included) who want to continue the tradition of story-telling without fear of censorship, but on the other hand, does anyone really want to face the wrath of the public mob?