>>916 This thread is just a joke. It's not the real Acid^^ >>919 >>925 Apparently there is a pretty big range in how long validate takes. Something like 1-5 times. I don't know how to explain it though but yeah, 1-5 minutes even if done on the same computer is normal (and slower the slower your CPU is?). >>929 I am too. Not really much point putting in any effort on this board because the problem comes from above the BO title, but it can be used as some kind of waiting board I suppose--

>>931 kohlcash isn't that bad, I solved it on trash-tier gear running solver.py in less than 3 hrs. I got the bypass and been posting shit whole evening.

>>934 I've only been posting in the lg threads so far because I was hoping to still use this site as a /b/. But now /b/ here is dead lol

>>933 Validation here means nothing. It's in the background anyway. >>933 Yeah, I agree, no point putting any effort in this place. Destroyed in the end anyway. Let's have fun before the burn!

>>933 Yeah this works fine as a bunker for me til whatever's going to happen happens >>934 >less than 3 hrs lol the rate it was going on this machine when I tried it, it would have taken 100 minutes Even the validation here makes me nope out sometimes, and it's not even a miner

>>935 This site is dead. Other for shippoasting, it's DEAD.

>>938 I think more than just the CG fags left the site to go post on KC lol

>>937 ILook: AMD c.P.U 4-core, using 2 theads: ~10k secs Churn away, I do my chores.... Come back 3 hrs later: finished after 71 percent. Now I've been using that bypass to post all evening.

>>939 Spread all over.

>>937 You gotta use the solver.py script, dude

>>940 Really low-end gear. Mid gamer c p u is 20X faster than this one

>>940 >>942 I don't like the feel of the place enough to go through all that just to post there tbh, especially when I could catch some random moronic ban and have to then do it all again >>943 I have a 12 core, still takes 100 minutes It only takes 6 of them but even at max, what's it gonna be, just halved? Letting them mine on my shit for 50 minutes just to shitpost?

>>944 >100 mins I'm perplexed. I had it solved in 0.71x10000 secs = 120 mins. On a trash low-end AMD processor with 2 thredas.

>>944 Go though it anyway, it's fun to shitpost there.

I didn't time mine but I think it was just over 2 hours using all 8 cores of my shit computer

>>947 plus I'd never ever in my life post there anyting with my country ball.

>>947 Well it's more active there than it is here (even including /cat/ thread).

>>950 Yes it is

>>946 Does the speed fluctuate as it goes? Cause 100 minutes is an estimate after letting it run for like 3 minutes at 1% a minute before noping out >>947 I mean I guess I could let it run on my potato if I got desperate

Definitely not letting them mine like that on this box

Literally this sloth: AMD A4-9125 https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+A4-9125 >>952 No. >>952 Do it. Not much of an effort.

>>952 Should be int the (doze n) minutes, I guess.

>>953 I was thinking the opposite. I have crypto mining computers and I was thinking of running the script on one of them. I think I can farm a bunch of the validation bypasses that way and save them? I just don't really know how (aka I'm lazy and haven't even tried). But I post on a shitty laptop 95% of the time--

>>959 I also don't know how much KC cares about avatarfags. I don't see it against the rules there but some retard kept saying he was going to report me if I did it, so--could just be troll?

>>959 >farm Just get one, dude. Not that difficult.

>>962 Don't avatrfag. No reason.

>>964 And don't mind the triolls , they're everywhere

>>959 I solved it in a fucking trash gear, and am shitposting right now. Stop whining, aggots.

>>966 *f

>>963 I meant so I can share them with people so they don't have to validate-- >>964 >no reason I enjoy it. Sure I can post without it (and have been in places that don't allow it), but I prefer it. And for a "long term" place it would be a definite plus for me. For the LG threads it doesn't matter because it's basically just regular posting there-- >>966 No complaints here^^

>>969 Plus one for that, dude.

>>964 >implying there needs to be a "reason" >>969 >I can share them with people so they don't have to validate-- Kind as shit tbh, though I can totally see (((people))) snatching them to immediately get them banned out of spite if shared openly

>>971 Yeah, would have to share by email or something.

>>972 Which probably wouldn't work so well either

>>971 Yeah.

>>702 /b/ is saved