>>1313 Added. Thanks for the banner!

>>1326 based

I would like to be removed from the volunteer section. Due to legal issues. I simply cannot continue and have to retire

>>1336 Aw, that sucks. I don't think I could work a job where they'd be breathing down my neck watching what sites I'm visiting

>>1336 Oh no were you caught with stuff?

>>1338 Basically. I'm from the UK where this sort of stuff is illegal. And now that I'm caught, I have to cut all ties/lay low from now on.

>>1339 Caught by who if not the cops?

>>1340 The police

>>1339 >living in the UK cronge

>>1336 >>1339 >>1341 Understood. Thanks for all your help.

>>1341 Were you arrested?

>>1345 Not yet. Why are you asking all of these questions

>>1346 I just wanted to understand your situation. I'm sorry about this, and I'll pray for you

>>1 >JYs Can we not use literal fucking japanese grade school designations? Just seems super unnecessary to conflate heavily stylized and unrealistic fictional cartoons with real world concepts

I don't know what the board owner's position is regarding the use of terms that allude to pedophilia, but disruptions caused by the discussion of the use of such terms will be deleted and the users involved will be banned.

>>1729 Based. That dude was an asshole yesterday.

>>1729 >terms that allude to pedophilia The genre itself is already called toddlercon, we might be past that point

>>1731 There he is mod! GET HIS ASS

>>1732 kek

>>1315 what... attention to detail

>>1729 Any allusion to real pedophilia or real children should be removed, as per rule 2. Limit bans to people who actively promote pedophilia or repeatedly spam accusations that 2D is pedo.

>>1741 Welp there goes 75% of the board

>>1741 This seems kind of arbitrary, what constitutes "allusion" to real children? You'd be foolish to assume this board is somehow pedo-free, how exactly do you determine if they're just talking about FICTIONAL toddler pussy or real kids? The discussion that takes place here is just as fictional as a doujin panel, I don't see how you're supposed you're supposed to differentiate when they're gonna use the word "baby" or "toddler" regardless Is this coming out of a place of a genuine belief that the board for something called "toddlercon" is actually catering to the secret otaku audience besides pedophiles or just a clarification to avoid legal issues?

>>1745 Just don't make explicit references to actual minors or pedos/MAPs/molesters/democrats/whatever you want to call them in your comments, specially if they are of a sexual nature. This and other related boards part from the premise that everything that is said and done is in relation to the fictional characters that are posted in them. Saying "I want to fuck baby Peach's tiny pussy" is fine, but saying "I want to fuck a real baby Peach's tiny pussy" would break the rules of this board. >Is this coming out of a place of a genuine belief that the board for something called "toddlercon" is actually catering to the secret otaku audience besides pedophiles or just a clarification to avoid legal issues? The second thing, or at least that is how I am assuming the BO's statement. I've been around the loli/shota world long enough to know that there is a certain degree of overlap between lolicons/shotacons and people attracted to actual minors (pedos), both among consumers of loli/shota porn and those who produce it, and while I personally don't mind the use of terms from one group and the other while referencing fictional characters, I also know that there are individuals in loli/shota communities who dislike the idea of such "overlaps" existing, so I try to stop and avoid discussions about the relationship between loli and pedophilia because: a) they always ruin the thread in which they originate, and b) they result in nothing because the parties involved almost always cling to their own beliefs and ignore what the other is saying. In short: - If you want to say perverted things don't do it in a way that makes it sound like you're talking about a real minor, otherwise your post will be deleted. - I don't care about people using terms like "cunny", "toddler", "kindergarten", "little girl/boy" or stuff like artists and doujin translators saying "dirty pedo" instead of "dirty lolicon/shotacon", but the BO and other vols may be against it. This applies to every board I "work" as a volunteer. - Prolonged arguing over whether using a certain term is right or wrong will get everyone's posts deleted for derailing the thread.

>>1746 >I also know that there are individuals in loli/shota communities who dislike the idea of such "overlaps" existing Boo hoo, we're on the TODDLERCON board, what do they honestly expect >I don't care about people using terms like "cunny", "toddler", "kindergarten", "little girl/boy" Lol seriously? Again this is the TODDLERCON board, its quite literally in the name, thats the entire point, unless you want to vote to rename the board and ban 99% of doujin It's all fictional anyway so it shouldn't matter, not being allowed to call fictional toddlers "toddlers" or fictional kindergarteners "kindergarteners" is autistic purification over semantics, and anyone constantly sperging over such terms in an entirely fictional context probably has more to hide than anyone If words trigger them that much maybe they should find another hentai genre besides TODDLERCON >This applies to every board I "work" as a volunteer heh

>>1746 so basically what we were doing already. i feel like you're walking is circles, when the only thing you should've done is banning the single imbecile who's trying to derail the threads, the exact same imbecile who were posting as "anti-hitler", spamming "school shooting" on threads, the same imbecile who made clear he wants your userbase gone, same imbecile who's enabled by /v/'s mods. Basically you'd just have to do your jobs

>>1746 also a majority of this board at least is very obviously comprised by pedophiles/unironic lolicons, whatever you want to call them according to one sperg the moderation has apparently been "compromised" because anons refuse to subscribe to the holier than thou moralfag groupthink and refuse to engage in the constant us vs them shitflinging the same crowd who has a problem with words like "jy" or "kindergartener" on a toddlercon board

>>1748 >so basically what we were doing already Correct, or at least that's my intention. It remains to be seen what the BO says about all this. >i feel like you're walking is circles I know this all sounds repetitive. I'm trying to make things as clear as possible. >>1748 >>1749 >the only thing you should've done is banning the single imbecile who's trying to derail the threads Again, such derailments will be deleted regardless of who initiates them. If you see an individual, either on this board or on the other loli-shota boards, filling a thread with complaints about the use of certain words without contributing in any other way, report the user and anyone else who responds to him and contributes to the derailment of the thread.

>>1750 based janny BTFOing moralfag autists

>>1750 >you are NOT allowed to use the word toddler on the board for toddlers! Im convinced these people are just shitposters

I made a custom spoiler based on this "Playtot" cover I found on Pixiv.

>>1757 Thanks for the spoiler!

New to this ,what r globule rules?

"Boylover" faggots should have to make their own containment board, or at least be contained to a singlet thread. There are more toddlercon fans than this board lets on but like myself they're probably turned away by homsoexuals posting infant males. Do you know who no male toddlercon doujin is ever sold at comic markets? Because when these freaks crawl out in to public with their boyfaggotry, even in broad daylight Tokyo, they get their skulls broken in. Nobody likes them! No more queers! Loli is justice! Attraction to young (2d) girls is healthy! Attraction to young boys is a sign of mental illness and probably some sort of intestinal parasite!

Quit being such a fuckin baby about it, the images on the screen can't hurt you.