>>9039
idk how you can browse /trash/ but consider /d/ too fast, lmao. i've only browsed like two threads of the /d/ slop thread, and went like 3-4 or so into the past, but it seems like a dick-measuring contest in making the thread as late as possible, literally "1-2" threads away from being archived was what i literally saw someone say, berating someone for making it on page 10 alone. it takes a few days to hit the bump limit, then days more to get archived, and i've seen a thread get archived before a new one was made. if anything i feel like /slop/ is way too fast. at least with /d/, i could theoretically catch up on literally every thread if given enough time. /slop/ is impossible, in that regard, to me. i guess just looking at the thread count. /ddg/ has 182 threads, and /slop/ has 1094. but it is also the speed at which /slop/ goes through threads now. /slop/ celebrated its 1,000th thread on march 25th. they've gone through 94 threads in 24 days. i just can't keep up with that shit, let alone litterbox links, which i expect to miss since i really only browsed /slop/ while catching up on older threads until i can't be bothered anymore, so i mostly see older ones than recent ones. it's also a matter of the content posted, where /d/ literally had a splinter thread created, in response to /d/'s slop thread having too much futa:
https://desuarchive.org/d/search/subject/dddg/
i enjoy futa, specifically ones with foreskin. it's my favorite. it's posted on /slop/ sometimes, but only once in a blue moon. /d/ not only does foreskin, but excessive foreskin, which i never even realized was possible in slop before then. i actually have seen some form of excessive foreskin on /trash/ a single time before (warning, smegma):
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/71992629/#71998159
https://files.catbox.moe/ppr586.png
but it's not the same. was about to explain why, but it'd be graphic, and i've already been yapping enough