/tv/ - I unironically agree with Armond White

Mode: Reply

Name
Options
Subject
Message	Max message length: 8001
files	Drag files here to upload or click here to select them 0.00 / 50.00 MB Max file size: 32.00 MB Total max file size: 50.00 MB Max files: 5 Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password	(used to delete files and posts)
Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

I unironically agree with Armond White JEWS 05/08/2023 (Mon) 21:36:24 No. 192

https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/04/tarantinos-no-sex-talk/ >Responding to an inquiry by Spain’s Diari ARA, Tarantino confessed, “It’s true, sex is not part of my vision of cinema. . . . If there had ever been a sex scene that was essential to the story, I would have, but so far it hasn’t been necessary.” >Earlier generations worried about gratuitous sex in cinema. Hollywood rarely makes love stories anymore. Movies are mostly Marvel Cinematic Universe confections, #MeToo diatribes, goofball comedies, leftist social dramas, or the routine excited response to Tarantino’s own highly influential violent escapades. They perpetuate a soulless eunuch’s view of art. >Public confidence in biology and sociology has been undermined, so the lack of sexuality in movies essentially means the lack of sensitivity and compassion and order. Millennials who don’t understand the dehumanization of Tarantino’s action-movie temperament are ignorant about what he leaves out. They don’t know what they’re missing. QT never asks the question at the heart of Godard’s Breathless: “What’s the difference between love and eroticism?” That no one in the media asks him indicts our times.

Index Catalog Archive Top Reply

Manage Board Moderate Board Moderate Thread

Forms

Delete

Password Unlink (Removes file reference from posts) Delete (Removes file from the server)

Report

Reason Category Global

No Cookies?

Quick Reply


Sage Bypass Check