From 2017 onward, people like…
Richard Spencer (Holodomor denier, weird links to Russia’s CIA equivalent, GRU)
Eric Striker (self-identified NazBol, fired from the Dailywire.name for “being a Communist”)
Keith Woods (self-identified socialist, rose to prominence via Richard Spencer)
Arktos Media (translated all of GRU spook Aleksandr Dugin’s works for Western consumption)
began promoting the idea that the Left’s total ideological domination of the West was not due to the last 75 years of Leftists infiltrating our institutions (which they have openly admitted to doing), but due to Neo-Liberalism, a set of economic policies that were implemented in the 1980s by people like Thatcher (who was racist and pro-family) and Reagan. Unlike Western Marxism, which consists near-exclusively of theories on how to dismantle the all-oppressing force that is White civilization, Neo-Liberalism contains nothing of the sort.
What Neo-Liberalism was responsible for, is accelerating globalization and enabling corporate monopolization at the hands of international financial elites. These international financial elites have, of course, greatly contributed to the nightmare world that we find ourselves in today. However, they form a specific cabal with specific aims: Rockefeller, Warburg, Rothschild, the Bilderberg Group — you know the gang.
These moneymen openly collaborate with Leftist intellectuals; they provide the cash, Leftists provide the brains, and they both work hand-in-hand towards the same horrendous new world order. For example, Rockefeller financed the Frankfurt School after they were exiled from Europe and harbored in New York in 1934. Students taught by these Leftist intellectuals regularly find their way into elite globalist organizations, like the United Nations or Council on Foreign Relations.
Ascribing the concerted efforts of this criminal cabal to the economic policies of Neo-Liberalism (or worse still, to the mystical abstract force of “Capitalism”) is just as subversive as the Leftists themselves. Yet, that is precisely what the post-2017 Alt-Right did. They simultaneously claimed that Marxism dindu nuffin and attempted to redeem Communism and Socialism, sending huge swathes of the (online) Right-Wing on a ludicrous ideological wild goose chase, culminating in the insanity of 2020, which can be summarized by the following image, la~
The problem with Liberalism (both the British and French varieties – I’ll write an article on the distinction soon) is that it defangs a country, preventing it from resisting internal political subversion. The same scenario played out during the interwar period with the Left’s attempted World Revolution: The Liberal states were completely inept at dealing with the Leftist onslaught, which caused the rise of nationalist authoritarianism throughout the continent, as the masses looked for someone to take action and fix the problem.
To summarize: Leftism destroys society, Liberalism obstructs resistance to this destruction.
Furthermore, the end-goal of the globalist project is not Liberalism nor “Neo-Liberalism” but the total technocratic enslavement and micromanagement of humanity, which is far closer to Communism — actual Communism, i.e. Communism in practice, not the Communist myth of the stateless utopian paradise — than any other ideological system, la~