/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover

For Lovers of Diapers and Ageplay!

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0.

Uncommon Time Winter Stream

Interboard /christmas/ Event has Begun!
Come celebrate Christmas with us here


8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

Thickest diapers? Baby 12/17/2024 (Tue) 05:42:42 No. 43866
I'm wondering what the thickest diapers available are. ;D I'm not sure of the source or validity of this chart btw, just something I found on here
>>43866 You mean this chart in this other thread? https://8chan.moe/abdl/res/33552.html#42754 Why the fuck didn't you just ask your fucking questions there tourist?
eh I wanna price to absorbency chart honestly
>>43868 I made one once, but not all companies rate absorbency the same and all the prices have changed since I last updated.
>>43867 Because that's a completely different thread lol
I think stock diaper thickness is just a bad metric to over-fixate upon, though. If your only concern is thickness, then that is easily addressed and improved in a number of ways - boosters, layering on additional diapers, etc. Cost to practical capacity would be quite useful to consider, however.
>>43893 Boosters feel fake and artificial. Diaper layering has the same problem. What it seems people want is a diaper proportioned up to adult size. Which means making it thicker to fit adult proportions. Which no company has succeeded in doing. >>43866 Sources are DiaperMetrics.com (majority), Adisc.org, and Xpmedical.com, among others.
>>43884 Idiot...


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply