>>140658
I'm not just saying it! This- it's demonstrable! This is - it's a scientifically provable fact, ok! We know how this story ends! Now, if you're asking me whether women are less able to crash planes, well I think that's a harder thing to say. We're living that experiment right now, and god knows what we'll learn from it! Now, you asked me earlier about oppressive patriarchies, and actually if you want to look at a real life patriarchy you just need to take a look at the Middle East. Like, that's a bloody terrifying place to be a woman! So, what does that have to do with crashing planes? Well, it's got just about everything to do with that! Do you think it's just a coincidence that it's the patriarchies that crash the most planes? I mean, the most destructive plane crash in history, it happened in our lifetimes, for Pete's sake, the world trade centre attacks! That's the kind of plane crashing a real patriarchy leads to, and if that's what misplaced masculine power can cause. If, now if you have a group of men - and these are really big guys, you know? - and you tell them they aren't allowed to climb the hierarchy which they've been promised a place in, if you're robbed of the chance to climb up, ok, then where do you expect these lost men to go? They'll go down, hard, and they'll try to bring as many people down with them. … No! It's not good enough to mask their pain - a man who can't move is in extreme existential pain, and putting on a mask can't change that, ok! Because, and the thing is, we know this already, it's not gonna change, and when a disenfranchised man accepts that he has to move and the only direction is towards ruin, he'll bloody do it! So, so if you tell the poor man he can't even bring friends, he'll try to set fire to the whole system! He'll write a master plan and he'll try to crash the whole plane with no survivors! And as long as you brush these problems off as, what do you call it? Hotheaded? That's reprehensible! That sort of fearmongering kills people - just look at how it panned out when the maoists, or the soviets put this, this ideology which, it isn't just wrong, ok, it's the WRONGEST wrong! It's, beyond wrong! And I'm still trying to figure this part out, but I've got a hunch that the postmodernist element to all of this is a compounding factor in the whole affair, because, well, not only are we saying that your value is intrinsic to your membership in a group, but because the ego, or the "soul", you know whatever we agree to call it, these postmodernists are saying that "you" don't exist in any meaningful way, that the only thing seperating you and any other person you point at, they say it isn't perspective or identity, that it's just language! They maldefine pronouns so far, and they seriously claim that "I" and "you" are purely linguistic concepts which can be changed - and then, well, when postmodernism and marxism compound with eachother, we get to the point where functionally, you're nothing more than your group personified, right? So, you get disenfranchised men whose sole identity is "I'm CIA" or "I am the league of shadows" and you tell them the only thing that matters in a hierarchy is power, and THEN you have the gall to tell them that because of their group status that you're FORBIDDING them from climbing any further up the hierarchy you've conspired? That power has to go somewhere, ok? It's NOT good, bucko.