>>206970
also on the first point: UK/USA/probably even USSR were "overwhelmingly christian" when they destroyed European nationalism in WWII. and look at the Roman Empire, Europeans were dominant before christianity as well. so it's a coincidence and not a cause
I can see the value or arguably even necessity of having a religion for the masses to follow to encourage desired behavior and discourage undesired behavior. it also increases social cohesion and adds another layer to their identity. but 'stianity is simply not a GOOD religion. it's a shame that we lost our original pagan religions created by our ancestors, that they were replaced by this dead kike on stick worship with cuck morality
don't wanna derail the conversation with this 'cause lads will never agree on it 'cause some think that there is a monotheistic god inside their head listening to their thoughts and if they question anything then their soul is going to be dragged down to eternal hellfire. it's almost useless to talk about religion with these people
>>206973
even if the basic principle of a vaccine (introduce dead piece of pathogen so the body can build immunity to it before actual exposure) is sensible, we cannot trust modern pharmaceutical companies to make safe products with relatively benign ingredients, especially after this mRNA gene therapy debacle. it is more than obvious that they do not care in the slightest whether or not the people that receive their products suffer health consequences or even die, they just want to make as much money as possible
a young, healthy person does not NEED vaccines, so getting vaccines (even non-mRNA) is unlikely to be in the best interest of their health. they most likely have preservatives, adjuvants and all sorts of things that are harmful to health