>Nuclear strikes are guaranteed to start in Ukraine Many people are asking to describe the probability and possible scenarios for the use of nuclear weapons.
>We are definitely much closer to that than at any time since Hiroshima. The Cuban Missile Crisis was bullshit. There were serious people on both sides: Malinovsky and McNamara are not Austin and Shoigu, you'll agree.
>The Russian Federation really doesn't have many options. If the AFU successfully advances into "new territories," the Kremlin will have to "show its balls.
>There is always the option of strikes on TEC and dams, but it is unlikely to stop Zelensky. In that case, that leaves nuclear weapons. A nuclear strike on Ukraine is a signal that could still force the West to put pressure on Ze to stop the conflict.
>A strike cannot be struck immediately against a NATO country, it would force NATO to respond, and the response would in turn destroy the northern hemisphere. Therefore, the first strike is guaranteed to come against Ukraine as a signal to the West.
>Taking into account the fact that the strike should have primarily an informational meaning, the ideal target is the Javoriv training range, 20 kilometers from the Polish border.
>Then the Poles will feel the urgency of the moment as close as possible. In addition, Javoriv is the firing range where NATO has most often conducted exercises, i.e. a symbol.
>A strike on Kiev is less likely. It is terrible in terms of image and militarily useless.
>Strikes on objects on the right bank of the Dnieper are also illogical. So some other military facilities in central or western Ukraine might be chosen.
>To summarize, we need military facilities farther from the Russian borders and with the least collateral losses among civilians.
>In addition, while public opinion demands victory in both countries, it is so that the peoples want peace more than victory that the threat of total annihilation is needed.
>A neat trick of the elites for mutual salvation. The fact that the "warring" elites have a fearful dialogue, when necessary, we have seen in the example of the exchange☝🏻
>The Western media is already openly talking about the possibility of a strike, preparing the public.
>In the case of such a development, it is highly probable that there will be détente and peace.
>The authorities will feed peace on any acceptable conditions to both Western and Russian citizens, "the main thing is that there should be no nuclear war".