>>475667
I'm increasingly thinking that you do need to ultimately cite religion as to why society has to be a certain way
>you should do this
<why?
>because it's good because reasons and also I said so
>no lol
that doesn't work
>you should do this
<why?
>because God says so and you're gonna burn forever if you refuse
<alright, I guess...
like the chain of logic behind an ideal can be deconstructed to nothing if it doesn't end with 'God'. and people will deny that too but at least it's logically sound
>>475668
no, it wasn't even the focus of my post. I was talking about how I've been reading women saying women bullshit for a long time now and basically we have to force them to breed because they will never consent to it. it's that simple, the question of whether or not the white race survives depends on whether white men are going to ensure that it does by force or not. the Pashtuns ensured their survival in Afghanistan, the question is whether modern faggotized white men have the spine to do the same. but 'maybe we can convince white women to fall in love and get married and make babies and we can be kind and respect eachother' is a hard no, it's never going to happen because they are collectively saying a firm and resounding "NO". but we're stronger than they are so we can overrule that and there's nothing they can do about it but scratch and bite and kneel and shriek
>>475673
I don't think anybody denies that the majority of white people deserve whatever they get. the thing is though there's some 10% of us that aren't trash and we don't deserve to be subjected to this shit just because of the retarded 90%
if we survive then we can do eugenics and genetic engineering and turn everybody into gigachad gigachuds with artificial wombs and sex robots. what can be, unburdened by what has been