>>21607 Good thing the Semitic people's seem to love incest then.

>>21616 >Good thing the Semitic people's seem to love incest then. Boy, do they EVER

>>21794 It also blames Nero for the burning of Rome.

>>21796 >first part I never said Esau was smart. Bhe bit I was referring to is the middle bit where he pretended to be Esau by using goat fur to simulate his hirsute brother's arm to his blind father. It's one thing to be a price-gouging kike, taking advantage of the stupid, it's another thing altogether to outright steal from him and his father.

>>21795 >It also blames Nero for the burning of Rome. I'm a little more shocked at his kicking his pregnant wife to death and replacing her with a femboy eunuch.

>>21797 Read the whole thing. The point of the story is that God doesn't want an impulsive weak man. Even if Jacob wasn't doing something good, he still had qualities that God wanted.

>see actual Christianity being discussed on the front page >its /co/ ... Maybe they released a new comic of the bible? >click link go to thread >it's this This was not a wholesome read.

>>21780 >when you make Juggalos look pretty Imagine living your whole fucking life looking like a hideous genetic wreck in the first place but you're ALSO a hardcore kike so they force you to look like a complete cunt on top as well. Can't even try to mask the ugly, gotta emphasise it to the extreme, imagine them fucking some whinnying hooknosed jewess who's already thinking up ways to emotionally persecute their repulsive children.

>>21801 >This was not a wholesome read. No, no it wasn't. About the only thing I thought was even close to clever was the idea of hiding the Golem of Prague by making it into bricks and hiding it in plain sight. And then they ruined it by turning it into the worst Megazord ever.

>>21803 is the moving fighting house a jewish thing im not aware of? iv'e seen it on gravity falls before

>>21824 Jews can't leave the home on sabbath, so yeah. To them the idea of killing your enemies while still being technically "at home" is a glorious lifehack that makes them diamonds.

>>21825 This. They also put a giant wire around all of Manhattan because they think somehow this tricks God into thinking they aren't breaking the rules, because the wire is like a fence which means they're always within their fenced off area which can be considered their home. You'd think trying to trick God would be the biggest sin of all, but He never thought anyone would have the balls (or stupidity) to try it, so He forgot to mention it, so therefore it's okay. Tricked that stupid fucker! It also means whenever that wire gets cut, jews aren't allowed outside, at least on the sabbath. They hire someone to fix it very promptly, but still, it's something to be aware of. Could be useful.

>>21824 >iv'e seen it on gravity falls before Philistine!

>>21826 >They also put a giant wire around all of Manhattan because they think somehow this tricks God into thinking they aren't breaking the rules >mfw Don't forget the Shabbos Goys: paying a gentile a pittance to make sure they don't have to stop enjoying their miserable little lives.

>>21826 You're not actually joking, they put a metal wire 18 miles long around Manhattan for this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccfDo7yTHr8

>>21832 >mfw the jews think God, omniscient and omnipresent, can be rused with cheap cop-outs like this There is no race I trust less, and I once worked for an Indian.

>>21845 I don't think the act of the motion is meant to be a ruse. Jews just don't focus on the spirit of the law at all, the law only exists in language, and perhaps it could be said that the Hebrew god specifically exists only in language. While the Christian god is the one speaking the language?

>>21869 >I don't think the act of the motion is meant to be a ruse. Honestly, I just don't believe that. Their whole MO appears to be trickery in all their dealings. >Jews just don't focus on the spirit of the law at all Der juden are the guy in the roleplaying group who always finds some loophole that could be interpreted as him being allowed to play as a golem composed entirely of Infinity Gauntlets. I despise those guys, and I wasn't happy to find out there's an entire race of them.

>>21872 >Honestly, I just don't believe that. Their whole MO appears to be trickery in all their dealings. From a Christian perspective yes I suppose, the entire Jewish way of life puts a hyper-selection on ability to semantically disassemble the words into action because they only function on the basis of "do nots" not "you shoulds". >Der juden are the guy in the roleplaying group who always finds some loophole that could be interpreted as him being allowed to play as a golem composed entirely of Infinity Gauntlets. Yes and that's what I mean, following the letter of the law as opposed to the spirit. That's not an act of deception. It's not a ruse.

>>21873 >That's not an act of deception. It's not a ruse. I'm not sure God will see it that way. And He's not Penn & Teller, offering wealth and fame for managing to get one under the radar. >WELL DONE, MOISHE! YOU TRICKED ME, AND THAT MEANS YOU HAVE EARNED THE HONOR OF ETERNAL BLISS! >"Ha! Fuck the goyim and their fair play!" >INDEED

>>21899 Again, I believe I understand your framework. Correct me where I go wrong. You are treating God as if he were a person, or let's say a personality, and that person is trying to communicate something when he gives laws, and will not stand for being "tricked" when the letter of his laws are spoken. Am I wrong? Assuming I am not, I am trying to communicate to you, that as far as I can understand, Jews don't treat God like he is a person, like he has a personality. He is a string of text, a string of words, as abstract as a countries legal code. From the Jewish perspective, there is no "spirit" behind God's words, just the words themselves. The words arranged in a particular way are God. As long as the words are followed properly, no negative consequences, if the words are not followed properly, they are negative consequences. Not because some abstract entity has decided to "punish them" for their misdeeds, but because they "failed to follow the law" and by "failing to follow the law" the natural, let's even says, objective consequence followed. You can "trick" a person, you can't "trick" a book or a line of text.

>>21903 Thank you for the info. That's absolutely horrifying from my perspective, but it does explain a lot.

>>21903 But they believe that God can speak to them. Many stories that are canon to them very much show God as a personality. If anything he comes across quite humanoid in things like Genesis.

>>21903 That explains a lot. It's completely wrong even according to their own sources, what with God constantly getting pissed at them for being useless fuckups for a couple thousand years, until he says fuck it and starts hanging around Romans. But it does explain a lot.

>>21899 >I'm not sure God will see it that way. That's what the book of Job is entirely about. >>21913 >Many stories that are canon to them very much show God as a personality. Doesn't the Talmud actually have several stories of God literally telling the Kikes that they outsmarted him and they were good for it, or referring to the Kikes on how he should conduct otherworldly affairs? >>21914 >It's completely wrong even according to their own sources, what with God constantly getting pissed at them for being useless fuckups for a couple thousand years The Old Testament IS NOT the Jewish Bible. Never has been and never will be. The Old Testament is the Hebrew Bible, the Mikra, that was "created" back in 450 BC, around the same time Artaxerxes gave Nehemiah permission to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem, and is the point at which the Old Testament ends. The actual "Bible" of the Jews is the Talmud, which is an expansion and commentary on the Mishnah, a text that Jewish pharisees wrote in 217 AD to preserve their dying practices after the fall of Jerusalem over 140 years earlier, as well as rewrite entire sections of the Tanakh (Editorialized versions of the Mikra).

>>21915 >That's what the book of Job is entirely about. I'll be honest I don't know whether or not the Book of Job is canon to Jews, however, even if it were, Job wasn't failing to follow any laws according to the very Hebrew way of thinking. >Doesn't the Talmud actually have several stories of God literally telling the Kikes that they outsmarted him and they were good for it, or referring to the Kikes on how he should conduct otherworldly affairs? I am not aware of this, guess I am going to need to become a Hebrew Bible Scholar in order to understand how Jews view their own g_d.

>>21924 > I'll be honest I don't know whether or not the Book of Job is canon to Jews, however, even if it were, Job wasn't failing to follow any laws according to the very Hebrew way of thinking. That was the entire point. Job never did anything "wrong", yet everyone assumed he committed some grave sin because of how his life went down the drain. And, God did reward Job for his earnestness to never falsely admit to committing any fault after the entire affair. However, that was not until after God ridiculed Job for only following the law out of fear God rather than out of desire to be with God, as well as reprimanding him daring to think that he can understand the otherworldly affair God has to deal with.

>>21926 A very good point. Having just read up on it though, it also happens that God specifically mentions in that book that "aspiring to know god's intentions or personality" is in and of itself is a sin. What this would mean would be that any attempts to read into the "spirit" of any of god's laws. To guess his "intent" would be an act of sin. In such an instance, doing anything *other* than following the complete semantical breakdown of what the letter of law is would be a sin. Reinforcing my argument that jews effectively treat god as if he has no personality or personhood because the words themselves stated that attempting to attribute personality or guess at his intentions is in and of itself sinful.

>>21927 >To guess his "intent" would be an act of sin. In such an instance, doing anything *other* than following the complete semantical breakdown of what the letter of law is would be a sin. Doesn't that also bounce back to where you're still committing a sin, because you're still assuming that the written law is meant to be taken according to the words written on the page and according to the strictdefintion of those words? Especially when, outside of national law that only applied to the Hebrews, as there were other followers of the Hebrew god they picked up along the way, the only actual "laws" of God was the ten commandments.

>>21927 >it also happens that God specifically mentions in that book that "aspiring to know god's intentions or personality" is in and of itself is a sin. Wait, this is in Job? Isn't that canon to Christians as well? What passage says this? Because to be perfectly honest, if this is accurate, it does pretty much prove that jewish trickery is correct, and Christians should be doing it too.

OP, here. This is officially the longest one of my threads has lasted as well as being one of the most deep and educational. Thanks, guys!

>>21933 hey, among all they threads one makes, it was is bound to be one which is at least palatable, you know?

>>21946 Oh, I know. Nothing gets the party started like mutual outrage and mockery. I saw this on a comics download site and knew, from the moment I saw the cover to this abortion, that /co/ would want to see it. I should dump it on /pol/ next and watch the knishes hit the fan.

>>21948 >I should dump it on /pol/ next and watch the knishes hit the fan. i don't think that this /pol/ is very active, i miss 2012-2014 8/pol/

>>21983 This one IS pretty low energy.