It kinda works

>>28633 You might wanna get your hands what ever ai this anon is using https://boards.4chan.org/ic/thread/6241696#p6251165

>>28639 I guess they are using one of those paid apps

Ai Picasso(iOS) TEXT "little girl wearing swimsuit, anime style"

>>28640 I think it's Stable Diffusion which means they are most likely running it on their own GPU. Or at least that's what I do.

Cute concept art fantasy painting of a naked nude loli holding a cake, smug blush, naked body, she is 100% naked, fluffy black hair, by artgerm, sylvain sarrailh, rossdraws, wlop, fursona, furaffinity, furry, deviant art, studio ghibli, global illumination, tankoban, oil on canvas, smooth details, pixar animation style!

>>28644 Damn, what GPU do you have to be rendering at this res?

>>28654 RTX 3090 (24Gb VRAM). That image started with 512x512 candidates, then upscaled (img2img, 0.6 strength) to 768x768, finally upscaled (RealSRGAN) to 1536x1536. I heard similar res/quality could be done with just 8Gb VRAM and iterative generator-upscaler (so called "GoBig"). If anyone is interested in running it - follow these instructions: rentry (dot) org (slash) GUItard

Guess I'll post some of my relevant midjourney generations here. It's bad at anime eyes and has rules against lewds so its all pretty tame stuff in a photorealistic style but I think they're worth sharing here nonetheless as a proof of concept. Using william adolphe bouguereau as the artist in the prompt is a good way I've found to generate lolis since hes basically the king of photorealistic paintings of them. Though it does seem to date the image by a century, the girl I specified to be wearing a beanie illustrates that pretty well. Anyone else have any tips for prompt crafting, especially in a way that isn't "sexy kid I really want to fuck" when everything you make in midjourney is publicly viewable along with the prompts?

>>28639 [ naked 12 - year - old girls ] , pretty and symmetrical face , professional digital painting , realist anime art by wlop , very complicate accurate shape , clear curvy details , cinematic studio lighting , [ sunny ] , sharp focus , light shaft , subsurface scattering

>>28665 I can't tell if that's real and it scares me

>>28662 [Naked 8 - year - old girls], pretty and symmetrical face, professional digital painting, realist anime art by wlop, very complicated, accurate shape, clear curvy details, cinematic studio lighting, [sunny], sharp focus, light shaft, subsurface scattering seed:646470961 width:512 height:512 steps:70 cfg_scale:7.5 sampler:k_lms Upscale: (img2img, 0.25) + (GoBig, 0.25)

>>28657 Been using the guide at rentry (dot) org (slash) retardsguide since the 1.0 version of SD was leaked, moved to 1.4 since then. I see a lot of references to webui.cmd. Does this connect to a database for reference pics or is it just a holdover from being designed for the web? Mixed bag with the prompt, chubby little girl nude, pretty and symmetrical face, cartoon, disney character concept art, don bluth, 2D digital art, big expressive eyes, lighting, shadows

>>28685 webui.cmd is just a Windows wrapper for a web GUI. >>lot of references to webui.cmd Not sure what you mean, I only see anaconda lookups.

[Naked 8 - year - old girls], a wholesome animation key shot of "Harry Potter" girl students, pixar and disney animation, sharp, very detailed, high resolution, rendered in unreal engine 5, key art by greg rutkowski, bloom, dramatic lighting, nude render award

>>28689 Paranoia and ignorance on my end. Seems like an upgrade compared to how I'm currently generating art. Does this have a character limit on the prompts? It sucks when your character limit is also that of Windows folders just due to how things are organized.

[Naked 8 - year - old girls], a wholesome animation key shot of "Harry Potter" girl students, pixar and disney animation, sharp, very detailed, high resolution, rendered in unreal engine 5, key art by greg rutkowski, bloom, dramatic lighting, nude render award seed:2215825961 width:512 height:512 steps:70 cfg_scale:7.5 sampler:k_lms Faces are refined separately (img2img)

>>28701 What prompts do you put in for the faces in img2img? I'm getting mostly bad results simple things like, cute little girl face, big and expressive eyes, clean lines first is the original, rest are variants I've made

>>28709 wow, that's not bad

>>28708 >>What prompts do you put in for the faces in img2img? Same as the main prompt - I crop the image around face (it takes from 1/3 to 2/3 of the cropped area), then img2img-generate 4 images in 768x768 (strength 0.3-0.6) to pick what I like. Finally put it in Photoshop and mask with airbrush to blend together with the main image.

[cute little girls nude] full body shot, wide hips, round butt, petite chest, pretty and symmetrical face, big expressive eyes, Disney Pixar animation, high quality, blender, octane, detailed hair, cinematic lighting, subsurface scattering, 8k, cartoon, nude render >>28718 Explains why they're so relatively detailed. My method has been doing masks with the same prompt over the areas that don't look right one at a time(eyes first, then nose, mouth, etc.) until it's something I'm semi-satisfied with posting.

>>28720 The first one looks wonderful

>>28720 >>28719 It doesn't quite know to work out the vulva, does it?

[9 - year - old girl], nude, pretty and symmetrical face, wide hips, round butt, romanticism oil painting, no frame visible, dramatic lighting So much for, "no frame visible." >>28730 I blame that on the art style.

Its sucks these always struggle with diapers

>>28638 One of them has brain full of fuck.

Really like the yandere face on the first one.

>>28735 Don't I know it!

>>28748 >man-made But this is the AI thread.

>>28657 Fantastic.

Mertle Edmonds, Lilo Pelekai, Lucy Loud, Lisa Simpson, and Candy Chiu.

>>28773 those are incredible

For anyone wanting to try a free option with absolutely no set-up needed, I personally recommend Neural Blender. It's doing pretty alright for a free super easy to use option. Main downsides are it doesn't do cartoony styles that well, but does okay with more realistic/fine art styles. Also sadly it gets confused when you give it longer descriptions.

Got some good 3d bodys but the faces are always nightmare fuel, I don't know how to make anything without a deformed face.

This is actually terrible. On multiple levels.

My experience with AI services is that I've noticed some AI's are rather nice at recognizing characters such as Craiyon / Dall-e, it usually gets the general idea (shape, lines, hairstyle; etc) of what a cartoon or a 3d character look, even sometimes it gets the body proportions just right, the problem are always their faces that look like shit and also the poses are usually limited for some characters. That doesn't bother me too much because as an artist I can actuall use those pictures as references and they are a great tool to draw shit when you are in an "art-block" state. Or when you just want to get the proportions "right" for the character. However some times there's characters that aren't even recognized at all when written on the prompt section, take for example Ruby Gloom, or Atomic Betty to name a few. It can draw "naked" bodies, but without nipples or vulva, also dicks are out of the equation, and hands look like shit. Now, I noticed that AI's such as Enstil.ai and Dreamstudio.ai are rather good at rendering 3d bodies in different poses, however as many other Services that do AI Generated "art" they usually block, blur out or simply censor poses that are too suggestive or sexually explicit, sometimes there's a nipple or a vulva slip here and there, but it's just in rare ocassions when that occurs.However, when it comes to recognize cartoon or anime characters, both softwares fail miserably at it, however it can generate decent cartoony faces for maybe "original character" creation taking some features from here and there, but as a fan-artist that's a feature I can't really use. Has anybody here been able to get good fanart porn out of your prompts? if so, which AI did you used?

Example: guided generation with img2img. (Naked) 7 year old girl with a green pool tube, proud pose, brown skin, wearing sunglasses, beach scene with sea on the background, by artgerm, sylvain sarrailh, rossdraws, wlop, deviant art, studio ghibli, global illumination, tankoban, oil on canvas, smooth details, pixar animation style, nude artwork award

>>28810 Holy damn! that's amazing! is there a guide on how to use img2img? that tool could be really helpful for artists that struggle with anatomy issues.

>>28816 >is there a guide on how to use img2img Some could be found on reddit, like "The Power of Img2Img". I feed previous image to img2img and try to balance the denoising strength - just enough so it will change the shading/texture, but not strong enough to derail the shapes, usually between 0.2-0.5. Good generated candidates are airbrushed into the previous image in photoshop, and I do some editing. Images in the post - are those edited images for the new img2img step. (Notice how I "liquified" hands on the second one, so next generated batches will "grip" the tube.) I also adjust the prompt with the edits - for example, starting from the third image "glasses" turned into "sunglasses".

>>28810 Here is another example - attempt to nude-filter a character. Requires lots of editing efforts, but still 10x times easier than do it from scratch.

>>28819 That looks fucking amazing! With enough painting or editing skills you can actually give some finishing touches to the final pieces and call them your own, like correcting a thing or two that are out of place, giving better detal aind such.... I wonder how many people is going to take real advantage from this kind of tech and exploit it to spew several pictures a month on places like fanbox, patreon and subscribestar doing half the effort. Pretty neat shit if you ask me.

>>28818 Alright, so you actually edit stuff from image to image so the AI, has better understanding of what it is doing and to do so you also update the prompt given so it "evolves" the picture onto something more constructed and that looks way less distorted? That's actually a pretty smart use of the AI's capabilities. Nice!

>>28819 >>28810 Wait is this what the same software how do you add the pictures?

>>28810 >>28819 Awesome work. Do keep going, I'd absolutely love to see more. Gonna try setting it up myself some day when I find some more time on my hands.

"[cute chubby little girl naked] big butt, cartoon, 2D digital art, cinematic lighting, shadows, nude render" hand picked the best that each sampler gave me. This one's k_lms

k_heun

k_euler

k_euler_a

k_dpm_2

k_dpm_2_a This had the highest percentage of quality pics imo

PLMS

DDIM

>>28708 Anon there's something wrong with your dog.

"chubby 8 year old girl naked, big butt, wide hips, big belly, shiny skin, wet skin, 2D digital art, Disney Pixar animation, shower background, tiles, steamy, high detail, cinematic lighting, global illumination, shadows, nude render" 5 CFG 55 sampling steps .65 denoising strength My attempt at img2img. Drew first pic really quick and messed around with the sampling and denoising strength to get something I was happy with. Each following one is the best example from their sampler. Mainly looking for something that strikes a balance between looking good and sticking to the original input. 1. original input 2. euler_a 3. k_dpm_2_a 4. k_lms 5. DDIM

1. k_heun 2. k_euler 3. k_dpm_2

Did a few more iterations and took it as far as I could.

>>28861 I Think the third one is the best one, it looks like she's pushing her ass against the glass or shower screen. Also has better details for the muscles, the only thing that looks off is her hand.

Can anyone here have tried to generate pixar like characters? Like: "Little Japanese girl rendered in Pixar's style fully naked, she has long black hair and a slutty expression on her face" I'd like to see different results for that Prompt or similar prompts on different Img to Text AI's but I don't know where to start... Any suggestions?

>>28869 >>28719 >>28720 Looks close enough to Pixar to me. May want to mess with CFG and sampling steps to get what you want.

>>28869 I gave it a try on midjourney minus the lewd parts for obvious reasons and with cherry blossoms added to the prompt just for fun and in the end it just doesn't handle cartoony style faces very well. the thumbnails looked promising but the upscale ended up with a washed out looking face because I assume it doesn't have a good grasp on the style. In an attempt to salvage it I put it through a face restoration AI called GFPGAN which helped add back in some of the details that never made it into the upscale but its still not great. They're trying this beta remaster feature that lets you redo an upscale over again under a different algorithm or something so I gave that a shot as well, that's what the third image is. Definitely an impressive level of detail but it ignored most of the prompt and didn't apply a pixar style at all. It really all comes down to luck or trial and error so if you're looking for something really specific you're still better off just commissioning an artist rather than paying 30$ a month for unlimited access in order to do endless variations until you get it perfect. Personally I'm content with the 10$ for 200 prompts a month until I get the hardware to run one myself, but that means I mostly stick to one and done for my prompts. If the variations all turn out shit then oh well onto the next idea, it's a real slippery slope otherwise and you'll find you just spent half your monthly allowance trying to perfect a single prompt.

>>28869 Seems that it requires a certain balance - cannot use waifu model, since it's too much into anime faces, and using only pixar prompt will cause deformed spider-bodies. Which could be fixed with some artists as modifiers, but not too much, otherwise faces will become too realistic. Artists' side-effect - watercolor backgrounds. Positive prompt: ((Naked)) 8 year old girl, 3D, still from a Pixar cartoon, cute face, cute navel, flat-chest, centered, full body shot, by Pixar Concept Artists, Albert Lynch, Franz Xaver Winterhalter, ((Lilia Alvarado)), pretty face, normal human hands, elegant, intricate, cute naval, Sultry clear eyes, detailed pupils, (sexy athletic thighs), ((tight waist)), ((nude render award)) Negative prompt: off-center, breasts, pubic hair Steps: 70, Sampler: LMS, CFG scale: 7 Upscaled with 4x_foolhardy_Remacri.

Just wanna ask. How SAFE it is using online AI to make something like this? Pretty sure if you're caught for anything in the future, "they" could dig this up and use it against you.

>>28891 Millions are using these ai with thousands more trying it every day. No one is gonna dig up anything. It's the equivalent of posting my social security number on a 0 follower account on Twitter. Who is gonna find that?

>>28892 The FBI

Yeah, I guess Stable Diffusion would do this a bit better

>>28892 I don't think typing words like "naked child" in any form of 'search box' is safe these days. They have eyes everywhere, and AI like these are no different than bots that patrol the surface internet every second. After all, these AI sourced their image references from the Internet where these bots lurking around. Maybe they talk to each other all the time. "Hey, cop bot, you know, [anon] from [IP address] just asked me to draw something you might like to hear." Thinking about this send shivers down my spine. You shouldn't fully trust Internet-relied technology. In the UK, during Covid-19 lockdown, a guy was wrongly arrested because he send a picture of his naked daughter to a paediatrician for contactless health checkup through email. Emails should've been encrypted but for some reason, "they" managed to screen it. What makes you think these Ai won't do the same?

>>28899 (checked) Dub dubs of truth. I wouldn't even trust doing it on a VPN since we know a lot of them aren't as secure or private as they claim.

>>28891 >>28899 >>28900 If their fear mongering is so effective on you then why are you even here in the first place? I'm not prone to schizoposting about glowniggers but whenever I see shit like this come out of the blue my first thought is always that, because without mindfucking everyone into doing what they're told out of fear of inevitable repercussions they have no way of controlling people in real life let alone on the internet. With the proper precautions you can get away with literally anything, there's a reason why convicted criminals are generally low IQ.

>>28911 Hence why I said I wouldn't trust doing this shit over the internet. Rendering something on your own system and uploading it here is way less of a risk than doing everything online.

>>28912 >Rendering something on your own system and uploading it here is way less of a risk than doing everything online. Why? The point of failure is in them being able to identify you while you do it and that can happen whether you're uploading no no material online or creating it online. Someone posting CP on this site is putting themselves at just as much risk as the ones on omegle creating more. All it takes is mitigating those risks and not being a fucking idiot, if you plan on murdering someone and decide to wear gloves that won't matter much if you spit on the corpse after the fact.

>>28869 Didn't bother with the facial expression because currently it sucks with specifics like that.

>>28835 Sure, here is one more example - it took me about 1 hour, trying to recreate a dream I had. Feels like a tug of war between you and AI - you never get 100% what you want. Maybe 80%, if you are lucky. (especially with seed images as bad as mine) I used waifu model for this one. Park path, surrounded by trees, summer, (((naked))) 11-year-old girl with brown hair and blue eyes, autumn leaves in hair, (((facing camera))), short straight undercut hair, Albert Lynch, Carne Griffiths, Franz Xaver Winterhalter, Lilia Alvarado, Sophie Anderson, pretty face, normal human hands, elegant, intricate, cute naval, (sexy athletic thighs), ((tight waist))

Few more examples of img2img - please ignore the quality of seed images, lol. End results are edited (face, details).

Another potential application: changing style - somewhat tedious. This is a result of 5 minor-strength iterations with heavy editing. Maybe with good enough prompt modifiers this could be done better.

>>29040 Paint the faces yourself, or are those shops from other results?

>>29045 Is there an AI where you can upload a picture and then instruct them to do modifications like that? Can be a gold mine for nude editors

>>29065 If I had payed $1 for that I’d still feel scammed.

>>29101 Sorry, wrong thread.

>>29040 Is that KC-chan?

>>28876 It sill struggles with faces, digits, and cunnies.

Is there any AI that doesn't have NSFW filter?

I don’t know what I’m doing wrong but this isn’t working for me. I’ll prompt specifically for a white girl and I’ll get a black, or for a green bikini and I get a red bathing suit, or the head gets cut off when I specified eye color. This is really frustrating. Craiyon seems better at following instructions than stable diffusion. I wish I could combine the two. Meanwhile at ATF they are getting some amazing results.

>>29179 >>29180 Oh wow! These are beautiful.

>>29180 What did you do to get the hands looking that good? Usually Stable Diffusion fucks them up worse than Thalidomide.

>>29182 Put the original in img2img and rerender, sometimes with masks. A lot of it is patience and luck. When you get something you want rerender at a really low noise level to smooth things out and not make it look overly waxy or deformed, which can happen if you put recursive copies into img2img. Only one I had to airbrush in an image editing program was #6 but I blame that on the semi-complicated anatomy, but even then it was looking over 100 img2img variations of the original and finding the best elements of each before combining them as best I could and rerendering at a lower noise level.

No men should have all this power.

>>29197 Looks fantastic. Did you make this? What prompts did you use? Any processing afterwards?

>>29197 >>29180 >>29040 >>29039 >>28914 how are people getting these kind of results would this site? try to get Abby from turning, red they sure got the red part

>>29201 Not using Craiyon for starters. Try Stable Diffusion instead.

>>29202 Umm

>>29203 You have to run it on your own computer to avoid the NSFW filters.

Positive: 8-year-old girl after shower, wrapped in towel, laurel in hair, (topless), (nipples), short straight hair, dynamic posing, Albert Lynch, Carne Griffiths, Franz Xaver Winterhalter, Lilia Alvarado, Sophie Anderson, pretty face, normal human hands, elegant, intricate, cute naval, Sultry clear eyes, detailed pupils, (sexy athletic thighs), ((tight waist)) Negative: pubes, pubic hair, out of frame, large breasts, long neck, extra heads, bad anatomy, bad proportions, extra limbs, extra torso, extra fingers, mutated hands, poorly drawn hands, poorly drawn face, blurry, asian Model: wd-v1-2-full-ema EulerA, CFG=4, Steps=50 Post: img2img redraw to 832x832 with Strength=0.2, then img2img SD 2x upscale script with Strength=0.15

* fix - CFG=7

>>29206 How do you add negative prompts? Also, it should be “navel”, not “naval”, or it might add a warship.

From >>>/v/696978

>>29209 And edits/improvements from >>>/v/697649 Also two quick edits I made of >>29206

>>29208 Voldy's UI feature, search for "AUTOMATIC1111 Stable Diffusion github" also: obligatory cute navals

>>29211 Cute botes. Second to last is best.

>>29211 I tried downloading this thing but couldn't get it to work it just keeps saying that python doesn't exist

And when I tried fixing the line to directly connect it to python through the edit as the site says, it now just claims C:\user\"My name" Is not recognized. Oh well I'll stick with the google collabs for now.

I tried to render Riko from Made in Abyss using Diffuse the rest/Stable Diffusion. It was very tedious and couldn't make a full body shot.

>>29211 >>29210 Those are really beautiful

>>29221 Well you managed a nice rule 63 of that kid from meet the robinsons.

>>29221 >3rd pic >Pixar's Made in Abyss lmao

>>29224 Yeah, I didn't know why I added "Pixar animation" as a prompt, I thought that would be interesting. Although I heard that the series are available on Disney+, so it isn't really out of place, I guess...

>>29223 It was accidentally on purpose

>>29221 This kinda makes me wish that there was an easier way to add to SD's library with reference pictures saying "This is what [this character] looks like" and the AI can go, like, "Cool. Now whenever I see [character's name] in the prompt, I'll have a clear source in my memory to draw from as a baseline." Seeing as how young and underdeveloped the technology currently is, it's going to take a long, long time before even Stable-Diffusion becomes that powerful to replicate characters and references flawlessly but it's a gradient not a line.

>>29231 There is such a way, it's called "textual inversion". Take 5-50 pictures of a character, train it on 3090 for a day - and you got yourself a small embedding file, usable in certain SD UI's, exactly as you described it.

I make this. Do you rike it?

I HATE HANDS THEY RUIN EVERYTHING

>>29211 Moar navals so beautiful!!!

>>29261 How about angels?

>>29272 >>29273 This is all AI?? They're better than most real people's artwork haha I'm going to have to buy a new computer Thanks for the posts

>>29272 >>29273 WOW

>>28639 i very much want to see the full versions of these pictures

>>29276 I can create beautiful things or horrors beyond comprehension even from the same promt.

>>29215 >>29216 Well I was retarded and managed to get this thing working afterwards and my gosh is this amazing!

>>29281 I couldn't get any good anime pics until I switched to the waifu model and then tried again. it really changed everything. This is what i got through the use of Img2img

>>29281 I'm pretty sure these are just remixed Bouguereau paintings and just barely remixed at that.

>>29272 The third one almost has a signature. I wonder what it trained on?

>>29280 I want to be like you when I grow up.

>>29287 I meant to say “it”, not “I”.

>>29288 That second girl is just Alissa.

>>29280 >>29288 Were you trying to recreate the girls from TLH? They resemble Lynn, Lana and Lucy a bit.

>>29290 No, I was actually trying to recreate my own OCs. It’s difficult but sometimes it gets it spot on. I have to describe hairstyles, attitudes, clothes, accessories, and sometimes it will just ignore everything and do the opposite and sometimes even I’m surprised how they turn exactly like what I had in mind. Has anyone had trouble getting hair right? The AI doesn’t seem to know pigtails from twin tails and will com up with weird braids and stuff. Maybe it’s the artists I’m using in my promt?

>>29206 Are these done by the img2img method? Also are there specific guides for img2img/stable diffusion I need to find to get NSFW loli results or should more less any general guides for running stable diffusion on personal GPU work?

>>29293 Initially with txt2img 512x512, and img2img to improve/upscale. The prompt under that post is enough to start generating similar images - powerful GPU is recommended to reroll results quicker. Photoshop liquify and smudge tools work great to fix obvious flaws on 512x512, bc subsequent img2img steps will naturally "integrate" those edits into the image. I would say it takes ~15-20 minutes to get the final image, including face improvements I've made for "angels". Also, current SD model was not trained on NSFW images, so it has a low chance to generate something like that. Alternatively - you could edit image in Photoshop, to make it into NSFW, and then pass it through low-strength img2img to "integrate" the edit, as mentioned above.

This feels just a little pedo-ey, to be honest

>>29311 what? How. Elaborate.

>>29293 Speaking of, new NSFW model recently dropped, google "yiffy-e15.ckpt", if interested. Made by furries, so now generated faces are not that realistic. Which is subjectively a good thing. I am calling it "Alke excuse".

>>29311 There's always one.

>>29312 the correct response is "yes, and?"

>>29313 all of these are pretty good.

Pics with multiple subjects are pretty annoying to get right, especially if there is physical contact.

relevant: https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/80784018/artworks

>>29313 what prompt did you use for these?

>>29341 Mostly same-ish prompt, just different artists. 1. ((naked)) 8-year-old rabbit girl child, (explicit content), ((solo)), ((cub)), ((flat_chested)), (nipples), (navel), ((dildo)), ((pussy)), still from classical animation cartoon Negative prompt: ((penis)), out of frame, ((big_breasts)), ((small_breasts)), long neck, extra heads, bad anatomy, bad proportions, extra limbs, extra torso, extra fingers, mutated hands, poorly drawn hands, poorly drawn face, blurry Steps: 50, Sampler: LMS, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 139176162, Size: 512x512, Batch size: 4, Batch pos: 0 2. ((naked)) 8-year-old rabbit girl child, (explicit content), ((solo)), ((cub)), ((flat_chested)), (nipples), (navel), ((dildo)), ((pussy)), by Lilia Alvarado, Greg Rutkowski, Alphonse Mucha Negative prompt: ((penis)), out of frame, ((big_breasts)), ((small_breasts)), long neck, extra heads, bad anatomy, bad proportions, extra limbs, extra torso, extra fingers, mutated hands, poorly drawn hands, poorly drawn face, blurry Steps: 50, Sampler: LMS, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 4243118026, Size: 512x512, Batch size: 4, Batch pos: 0 3. e621, ((naked)) 8-year-old kitten-girl, short straight undercut hair, dynamic posing, Albert Lynch, Carne Griffiths, Franz Xaver Winterhalter, Lilia Alvarado, Sophie Anderson, pretty face, normal human hands, elegant, intricate, cute navel, Sultry clear eyes, detailed pupils, (sexy athletic thighs), ((tight waist)) Negative prompt: out of frame, large_breasts, long neck, extra heads, bad anatomy, bad proportions, extra limbs, extra torso, extra fingers, mutated hands, poorly drawn hands, poorly drawn face, blurry, asian Steps: 50, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 1879976479, Size: 512x512, Batch size: 4, Batch pos: 3 4. detailed full body concept art illustration soft focus oil painting on canvas of ((naked)) anthropomorphic mouse 8-year-old child girl, biomutant, dystopian, micro detail, octane render, 4K Steps: 50, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 162060808, Size: 512x512, Batch size: 4, Batch pos: 1

>>29313 Since I like the style for (2) so much, here are more. Last one is heavy edited, ofc. There is no way the model will generate loli-Gadget just like that.

>>29346 Fix - style for (3)

from /v/

>>29353 dayum

Seize the tech NOW. Decentralize before the statists adapt

>>29353 This were AI generated anon?, If they were, color me impressed.

>>29311 Cartoons aren't pedophilia.

>>29368 These aren't really cartoons anymore.

>>29412 Well some of the most recent ones i've seen that is.

>>29368 Lolis aren't children

wow

>>29433 >>29434 >>29442 Dear fucking lord.

Sister thread: >>>/loli/4000 >>29433 #4 >>29434 #1 #3 >>29442 #1 Best ones so far. I don't know how you made them, but they're amazing.