>>6461 No, the internet created furries as we know them today. If any animation studio was responsible for helping create furries, it's Warner Bros.

>>6462 This. Furry comes out of sci-fi conventions, comic book APAs, fanzines, and conventions, and the internet. The impact of any commercial studio is minimal, only providing the barest of familiarity with "talking animals" to many people.

>>6470 Then it got co-opted by pedophiles who were into the "open & accepting" shit & now it's a haven for sicko chomos & rape apologists. Why are there so many online news articles of furries being arrested for diddling kids? I know lonewolf23k raped a teenager while on a trip to Paris. You let it become a sicko fandom, you may be in denial of that, but deep down you want it that way.

>>9926 >necrobumped this ancient thread just to rant about pedos again lmao

>"we're not a pedophile fandom" >proceeds to REEE when a site bans lolicon/shotacon/cub, gets mad when pointed to articles of furries being arrested for touching children, screams at the mention of the name Chris Hansen, also might go into a rant about how AOC laws are "anti-white laws to force fewer white babies to be born because teenagers are most fertile" while they're at it, flips the fuck out over the name of anyone who wouldn't coddle their "fetish" Unfortunately you will "never change" which is fucked up but I give up hope on you "people", you're beyond the assistance of mental health professionals to fix. Not that you will ever be worth the time or the effort when that can instead focus on those who would actually contribute.