>>316960 You sound like you're unveiling some kind of super weapon and I'm excited.

>>316961 I am. It's designed to make SJW infiltration the most expensive thing on the planet. Once you fuck with the cost/benefit, no one will back them. - Create many twitter accounts. One IP per account is possible. - Have those twitter accounts follow members of the untouchable network. - Have a bot use those accounts to occasionally like and retweet and reply with positive affirmations for all content the untouchable network generates. This will give you a positive ranking and keep you off the radar. - Then when we coordinate a hashtag takeover, take manual control of those accounts and counter the narrative. Yes, those accounts will be shadowbanned as well. However, if you keep this up, you will kickstart a chain reaction of cascading financial damage to Twitter. Commissar Sarkeesian's staff will experience extreme bouts of radio silence, which will make their backers and funding sources suspect they are pissing away time and money. Eventually, they will be notified of this plan (which is actually part of the plan), and they will adapt by having to apply their shadowbanning analysis to their own untouchable network to discover sleepers. In doing so, they will generate a massive amount of false positives and shadowban their own fanclub, which will cost them in terms of customer support and public relations. Additionally, the development costs and wetware costs to fine-tune that mechanism to reduce false positives will skyrocket and yield very little in return, which will bring the purpose of entire department under question.

>>316962 So this would all be done via a bot? Or would it require people actually making the accounts?

>>316963 Simplified management of a bot fleet designed to embed sleeper agents into the untouchable network in a way that cannot be detected. SJWs cannot tolerate challenges to their orthodoxy and will purge their own to achieve ideological purity. So… my technique forces them to engage in reckless purging. They are insulated to external critique, so in order to cause a highly desirable hive collapse, you have to setup a system that causes passionate insiders to be targeted by their own apparatus. And my tool will do that.

>>316960 this sounds fun but there is one problem >Reddit post history

>>316960 Sounds tasty. Been looking for a good excuse to post this vid

>>316962 You know even by announcing this here you'd be letting them know about this and they'll start a counter-strategy, right? HQ and Revolt are compromised here.

>>317009 Did you not read the follow-up posts? Forcing Twitter to create a counter-strategy is the point of this OP; as it will use up Twitter's scarce resources that would be otherwise be used elsewhere. Twitter's "house" is on fire and this would be setting smaller fires so the whole fucking thing burns down quicker. This is some Sun Tzu Forth Generation Warfare / infowars shit. The only complaint is that it relies on Reddit reputation in-lieu of background-checking as I, and a lot of others here, don't have any (useable) reputation on Reddit (because all I have there are some inactive/banned Ghazi poe's-law trolling accts)

>>317031 …and fuck Reddit.

>>317009 Good. The more paranoid they are, the more mistakes they'll keep making. We're already the boogeyman to them. More and more of these will just up their fear level.

>>316960 Any more on this OP?

>>316976 Are there other ways to prove if someone has been loyal to GG since the beginning?

>>317009 The whole point OP is trying to make is that Twitter keeps adding tools that make it easier to harm the service. I've also seen the idea of a blockbot that blocks advertiser tweets and stuff like that as well, since Twitter makes the vast majority of their income from native advertisements. I think the plan is too elaborate. All you need is to make block bots popular for the most mundane things. Abuse their harassment tools to filter advertisers, etc. Why is there no blockbot for liberals? They are silencing conservatives and moderates. We've had to deal with divide and conquer for so long in gamergate. Why not just start to d&c Twitter with block bots and stuff? >>317194 You're going to get a lot more damage done if you get people outside of gamergate fighting amongst themselves. Things are really hostile at Twitter right now with users. A lot of them are afraid of ending up on blocklists because of saying the wrong thing or talking to the wrong person. I think it'd be best to just help establish the fact that Twitter isn't a place to speak unless you want to be banned.

Shadowbanning might be what ends up killing the internet.

>>317009 >You know even by announcing this here you'd be letting them know about this and they'll start a counter-strategy In theory, we could do nothing, and Anita and Chelsea would take this op at face value as if it were ongoing and active. That's the beauty of chan culture, we;re hiding in plain sight and these fucks can't tell what's real and what isn't. I doubt the visit anything but this, revolt, and baph, and wouldn't begin to understand how to parse 8diamonds.

kkjkj