>>321294
Because that is how SJWs work anon. If the argument was simply about ethics and the SJWs argued about how their way of doing journalism is acceptable versus us saying it is unacceptable, we would have been done in 2014. SJWs instead will change the subject and throw in something out of nowhere like women's rights.
And the reason why is because of a concept called Intersectionality. The people who are running the media all believe in intersectionality. This is almost like NATO for hipsters. Basically, if someone who supports something that an SJW would support is criticized, such as the people at Gawker or those pedos such as Srhbutts, then intersectionality states that everyone who believes in those things MUST rush to defend them. This is why all these journals tried to change the narrative and make it about women getting harassed when the key targets were all men. And this is why #notyourshield was formed, to speak out against people who would use intersectionality to claim that women, LGBT, and minorities must be aGGros.
This intersectionality ultimately muddles the conversation as all the people who run the media use narrative that they create. This is also why we have a lot of conservatives who support GG, because conservatives believe in personal responsibility, which is what does not exist in intersectionality.
Finally, this allows for some pretty funny consequences. For example, people are supporting pedos because intersectionality states they must. Also, crazy people such as the guy who wants to be a 6 year old girl and that woman who is transblack MUST be supported under this ruling. And the best part is Muslims are considered a protected class under intersectionality, so you see contradictions. from forcing women to sit in the back of the classroom to rape, being excused by SJWs.