Dumping a few pics that share GG's points; some of them are not up to date, and new ones would be more than welcome.

I actually dont browse traditional social media, but hey have a bump,

>>323819 Understandable, as it's irredeemable shit.

Share some more, and do new ones if possible.

It's a slow time. We've had slow times before, it doesnt help that lots of the group is unwilling to do anything. Either an idea is going to "ruin pr", "divide the movement" or "shill shill shill"

>>323824 It's not important; what is is a crowd of people who are willing to move forward again and participate, and this requires a push. Just motivation and determination. It's not hard to achieve.

>>323816 >what needs to be done to ensure gamergate does end. IT NEVER ENDS. THIS WILL NEVER END AS LONG AS I BREATHE. This, all this, is a continuation of the moral activism and thought policing of the Jack Thompson era, with only a lull in the '00s where a few pot shots were taken at Penny Arcade to see what it would take to "turn" or dismantle the opposition(us). I'm never dropping my guard again, and there's about 200-300 diehards who feel the same way and will never stop watching. We were and ever are primarily strong as a reactionary movement. There has not been a galvanizing attack on video games in the past year, just minor scuffles over self-censorship and other small issues. If you want numbers for numbers' sake, go wank off over the 62k subscribers KiA and their full new page of content daily versus ghazi's 9k and quarter page of daily threads, some with no responses

>>323831 My argument is that it will not end until people like those don't disappear, or at the very least lose any kind of power and influence. Which in a way implies that it won't end indeed. But I would prefer for these shitheads to just go, than to imagine the world never getting rid of those cunts who make everything and everyone miserable, themselves included. Which is why I went with the more hopeful "we want this to end"

>>323833 But GG cannot end. Our mere existence is what is preventing SJWs from acting up again. I know we would be here for the long haul, maybe even a decade, but SJWs know they can't do shit since we would bounce right back at them the moment something happened.

>>323836 Sorry victoryfag, but that's bullshit. Low numbers of active GG supporters means that most SJWs are operating under our radar. High-profile targets like Leigh or Zoe attract attention, but they have lowered their public profiles significantly and now mostly operate behind the scenes, directing funding to the next wave, who the average gamer won't know about until after they're already winning every award and selling 2-hour walking sims on Steam. SJWs are going to Zerg rush us and without more watchers on the walls, we'll never see it coming until it's too late.

>>323837 Did I say we won? No. And how is it bullshit what I'm saying? If they are operating behind the scenes, they are fucking useless at it, because even with that places like tumblr with SJWs controlling it are falling apart. If they zerg rush us it's even better, because they show their hands that way. I'd prefer they do that instead of play this boring game where we have to check beneath every stone for a roach to stomp out.

There has to be something worth doing if people are to be interested in gg if there's nothing but stupid twitter drama and muh e-celebs then there will not much interest which is the reality of the situation.

>>323844 Checking them dubs, because this is correct. The thing is, apathy is like that old Calvin and Hobbes strip. >Calvin raises hand in class, is called on >"Just a reminder that while you can present the material, you can't make me care." >Cut to Calvin on the swing at recess later. >"Romour has it I've got her up to three packs a day! :^D" We can dig and present material, but we can't make the legions of normalfags who nominally agree with us care unless they want to. I'm at a loss as to how to get them fired up again. That was the biggest source of our numbers. People followed the tag, checked into the hubs, and participated in anything juicy. Repeat. Now they don't follow the tag, most anons aren't even on Twitter to boost our reach anymore, and there's rarely anything juicy to go after. #GG's ideals went viral in gamer culture more than a year ago, which is awesome, but without a core network to coordinate through things wil go back to pre-GAD levels of "nobody sees what the fuck is going on." And when the next wave comes, it'll be too late.

What we need is a honeypot. Somebody needs to be willing to go in deep cover and date a rainbow haired SJW dev girl until she inevitably cheats on you, and then blog all the gorey details.

>>323856 I think the issue is, tons of people do care, but only on social media these days. KiA is pretty much useless and riddled with goons and false flaggers, and 8chan got its numbers much lower because of the bugs (I'd actually advise trying to bring back previous users who left or stopped visiting/posting as regularly by mentioning how it now works perfectly again). We need to help make this shit more lively ourselves for now, until we slowly gather up the numbers again. It's slow and ungratifying, but there really isn't another method. Losing heart now is the very thing we should avoid. And asking /cow/ to help regarding retards like john kelly or ralph or christi or agorist or whatever other stupid goon could always be a nice source of amusement as well

Also, maybe pushing for another OP again might fire up people, it might be a good idea to try and boost this >>323814 (or obviously any other OP that might require people's attention; but this one is for E3, which happens in less than a month, allowing us for all the time we need for collecting and planning)

>>323856 I'd wager it's because we (to them) have done nothing. We used to shut down advertisers on websites. We used to hunt and spread info like wildfire. We even helped out charities. Most importantly: We made salt and we were entertaining (be it we did something fun, interesting, or just got lots of people talking about us.) Sure SJW see us in shadows now, but we are just carrying a big stick. Problem is, we haven't swung it in so long, we've lost some muscle (anons). We can't push all the time. But we do need to do stuff to keep us mentally active and engaged. Make GG constantly do stuff, and we'll get members. Only issue then is to make sure we don't turn people excited to see "what GG is going to do today" into a dogma.

>>323856 >And when the next wave comes, it'll be too late. I'd say we've effectively responded to and survived an "it's already too late" scenario with how embedded the progressives were within the media. If we pushed back against that, I feel like we can push back against almost any scenario.

Push downpour you homos

>>323911 I've posted in that thread ten minutes ago actually; trying to find material for it in frog vids. Not having much luck sadly.

>>323912 Focus on FE x SMT Also hook up with /swc/ if you want shit done with comics fuck /co/

>>323913 I disagree; fire emblem comes out in barely a few days, it's definitely what we should target again with torrentialdownpour

>>323913 >>323912 Uncharted 4 is a big name game that was literally censored in case it triggered faties. Admitted by one of the devs. Focus on that.

>>324046 Any content ? Pictures, links, videos ?

>>324046 A dev team deciding to cut one joke on their own is not exactly prime redpill material.

>>323822 Seeing that first chart I just had an epiphany. I was in a "debate" with a feminist recently who tried to argue that 'all charities that work to help women are feminist charities.' I just realized, I should have thrown TFYC charity in her face and watched her try and explain how GG is, by her logic, supportive of feminism. Damn. Next time.

>>323856 One thing you're forgetting now is that this has metastasized. The ca/tg/irls and elegan/tg/entlemen of /tg/ are under attack, hell, Clinton is using SJW tactics to gaslight her opponents. We're in a target rich environment now. We tore some bandages off, and we need to go after more. To be honest we need a new target, and vidya IS NOT enough. We have to go after the end boss. We have to go after Journalism as a whole. We need to attack outrage culture. We have to smash Moral Panic. We have the tools. We honed them fighting Gawker, Kotaku, and other shit gaming "journalism" outlets. It's time to go after BIG prey.

>>324084 This nigga gets it. Socjus is a cancer that has done more than infect vidya. It's a cancer that is on the verge of destroying western civilization. It must be opposed.

>>324084 >>324098 A good idea to be sure but two questions: 1.) How does the ball get rolling? How do we begin? How do we convince others this is something they should participate in? 2.) If it does get rolling, how do we keep from cannibalizing ourselves? Every Social Justice group tries to be inclusive of every other group, and if there is a hair out of line they start fighting each other. What would keep us from doing the same?

>>324103 The simplest way to get us to avoid that shit is to have no leaders, thus being free to think for ourselves; to allow dissent and discussion, thus being free to think for ourselves; to push for creative and ideas freedoms, thus being free to think for ourselves… Basically, just be your own person instead of seeking everyone else's validation and opinions. Make your own. This is the only and best way to ensure we never eat each other alive : "I completely disagree with you but I'm not going to act like it's a personal attack". This is why revolttards, twitter burnouts and ralph faggots keep pretending like GG is a hugbox and other crap, because they're incapable of dealing with disagreement

>>323856 yeah i agree. we need to rally the general supporters to some sort of action. tbh even if they are inactive i think there are quite a few of them. i think one of the main problems is that most don't see a visible path to take, or rather, there is no concrete game plan. most go for the gamergate hashtag probably because it's the most well known and accessible ways of giving support. i think some sort of plan/list of goals needs to be posted. not just here but on other main gg hubs, like kia and twitter. that way, even if the normal supporters are resigned to their "easy" activism, it can potentially be directed towards something more useful. also, even though it may fail miserably, perhaps we can make a good centralized hub? not like kia or anything but rather a place where various forms of material can be posted while perhaps also branching out into more generalized topics. - forums alone i dont think are enough. basically, so far we have relied primarily on just forums to congregate. however, traffic will stagnate without new content. gamergate is a reaction to poor journalism and sjw politics invading gaming. as a result, when there isnt a new "story" coming up, activity may slow down. perhaps this "hub" then can also be for articles, game development, etc. while maintaining the principles of gamergate as its backbone. in this way it may have the potential to bring in more people willing to stay as well as move away from being a pure reactionary movement to one that also creates exemplar material. i hope that generally makes sense

>>324084 >To be honest we need a new target, and vidya IS NOT enough. Then you're fighting something else entirely. Here's the deal: Gamergate has to be about video games in some way. That way can be looser, like attacks on Gawker, Buzzfeed, and Vox (who all have gaming outlets that align with that outrage crowd and the main sites themselves attack gaming) or through more focused, like VG247 directly. Either is fine because you do have outlets actively attacking gamers, tech, nerd culture at large, and it will always comes back to video games. This is important because it helps prevent from stretching ourselves too thin and, most importantly, helps avoid internal cancer. You remember what the "Plus" in shit like Atheism+ was? It wasn't "social justice," it was Atheism plus different, irrelevant issues. Those issues happened to be SOCJUS but they didn't need to be, it could have been anything. Cancer is not only from one political side, it's from any extreme fringe setting root. Among people who come for "plus different, irrelevant issues" you will have people that will say those issues matter more, that those issues are what should be focused on. Suddenly the topic shifts away from the original subject - Atheism there, gaming here - and you get a broken pile of shit. A similar thing happened to Occupy too: they lost the core message in favor of the other, irrelevant bullshit. When wealth inequality became second to internal politics, feeling safe, and with bureaucratic chains of command, the flip in priorities killed it. You need vidya to stay rooted and not fall for the same traps. Case and point: how many burnouts and people who try to ruin OPs play video games? Why do the grumpiest people who fuck with every good idea happen to be people who never talk about games they love? Finally, why is it that, among those who left, the ones who still know how to have fun and can do their own things playing vidya regularly is a common factor?

>>324252 Well said nigga. This is for example why many detest revolt and ralph : they keep using gamergate for EVERYTHING, even things that have nothing to do with videogames, and only because they hope they will garner attention from it. They are misusing the core and the message for entirely selfish reasons, so that their own interests get noticed and leverage instead of themselves helping.

I stopped following GG like more than a year ago. And all this alt right political extremism that I see in people I used to watch for GG updates is only proof that I made the correct choice. You lost. You stooped down to the Social Justice level. Fuck, SJW clowns weren't even the main focus, it was about the corrupt journalism scene. You let the inbred /pol/ retards dilute and poison you from within. You have no idea how saddening it is. People who want to make games are fucked unless they pander to shitty extremists, because that's the only way they'll be featured. "THEY'RE FOR/AGAINST THIS POLITICAL IDEOLOGY WE ACTUALLY DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT." The ONLY way for start up developers to get any attention is to shill for literal nazis like Hatred, or shill for figurative ones like Gone Home. Fuck, even that obnoxiously political and racist Angry Birds movie is being praised SOLELY for its "kill derr muslimes" message. I swear, it it was about "kill derr white man" you imbeciles would rally against it and cry and cry and cry. I'm so sorry that this is what happened to you.

>>324726 Maybe stop following retards on twitter if you want better info on GG you faggot. Alt-right cunts who keep crying about GG totally being cucks now because they won't suck their cock were in it for their own ego. Ralph, JKelly, all those idiots are worthless, have never helped and never accomplished anything. Either you grow up and do your own thing, or you're a sheep. Learn to take jokes and sarcasm, this "kill da muslims" shit from angry birds is a troll from /pol/ you moron. Jesus, are you fucking twelve ? Fuck off back to school. See you next week

>>324727 >Either you grow up and do your own thing, or you're a sheep. Which is synonymous with why I left in the first place >Learn to take jokes and sarcasm, this "kill da muslims" shit from angry birds is a troll from /pol/ you moron. Jesus, are you fucking twelve ? I'm guessing if you haven't seen anything from the movie, then you wouldn't know that there are scenes with a blatant "Coexist" sign and a building called Hamnesty International are extremely prominent. Just about everyone I've seen who is proGG PRAISES this movie for following this racist agenda, and not the racist agenda of the dirty left SJWs. And you say "see you next week" like this isn't the first time in a year I dropped back in. Follow your fuhrer.

>>324728 Yes, people have fun that a shitty movie about birds is making so many retards livid and mad just because they can interpret it in a way they don't like. Which is the point of GG too : pointing and laughing at idiots. Which I'm doing right now. If you'd followed GG you'd know most of those advocating for it show left-leaning ideologies, and that nearly all of them will call you a faggot if you try to play politics anyway. Faggot. Grow the fuck up or get out. Just because no one likes you doesn't mean you have to be such a pisser about it. See you next week.

>>324729 >>324728 JUST FUCK EACH OTHER ALREADY!

>>324730 Sadly, he looks like an insecure guy, and if I were gay, I'd only fuck someone I could suck more often than babysit.

>>324726 >I stopped following GG like more than a year ago. Ok. >then proceed to show previous statement is not true at all >I'm so sorry that this is what happened to you. No you're not. You love it. The same way some bluehair neopuritan buys a copy of BeaverHunt every month without fail and labels all the problematic contents. Fact is you fucking love it. You love the holier than thou thrill that you feel is naughty and forbidden to you. Underneath the shallow "dissapointment" virtue signalling, you are not bothered. You're hot for it.

>>324728 >questioning Islam >racist

GamerGate was co-opted by well-meaning but naive individuals who wanted to focus less on the ethics and corruptions aspect and more on public perception and trying to convince staunch, hardline SJW's that "not all of us like gore, smug anime faces, etc." I loved it when GamerGate was less about giving a fuck what the Literally Who's and their AIDS-riddled cronies thought about us and more about engineering a scorched Earth campaign that has Gawker sputtering on fumes today. Truth be told, the phantom of GamerGate is now the Internet's Boogeyman, much like Anonymous was pre-2007 Chanology faggotry. You'll always have a place in my heart. There were some epic breads and mighty keks, but in the end, people get tired of arguing and egos and bullshit and just plain move on. I don't hold it against anyone for staying with it this long but the spirit it started with isn't the spirit it has now, and that's perfectly ok. Cheers, anons. I still root for you.

Why are we talkking about alt right nonsense? The only people repeat the only people who I see actively push the alt right nonsense are ralph and his gang and the revoltards who somehow think they can turn a # into an alt right hangout when those morons can't even articulate what altright is without sperging,also the flames are dying out sadly it was bound to happen sooner or later,I will continue to keep a close eye on this board and help out anyway I can.

>>324812 It's just a retarded shill who came in and thought he'd totally get so much attention from it. Disregard the idiot.

A good pic worth spreading. https://twitter.com/RedDeadBen/status/744216460541726720

>>324742 >I loved it when GamerGate was less about giving a fuck what the Literally Who's and their AIDS-riddled cronies thought about us and more about engineering a scorched Earth campaign that has Gawker sputtering on fumes today. Same here, I havent been around here in a long while because I got tired of the faggotry about tumblrtard cunts who nobody knows or cares about The last straw was when nobody, literally nobody wanted to join the operations anymore. Sure, shitposting about dumb faggots is fun but at the end what you get? nothing, but with operations and digging you get to rekt those faggots IRL and make them pay for the shit they did by destroying their scams and revenue source Talking about anita or zoe doesnt do shit, but outing them for the illegal crap they are in could potentially change everything We went from being chanology-era anonymous to reddit levels of autism

>>325235 >>>/revolt/ if you have no reason to be here, go away

>>325238 You seriously giving me that shit? how about recognizing the fucking problem instead of being a bitch? I'm not the one gossiping about shit-tier ghazifags all day like you idiots do, I was the one saying we had to contact people like the koch brothers who wanted to get back at SJWs, and what happened? that a guy like that, Peter Thiel, took the initiative and bankrolled the gawker trial Admit the fact that both this board and revolt have been aimless for over a year now, if it wasn't because SJWs are so retarded they kill eachother there would be no victories to speak of Shit even the chanology fucks would protest at scientology locations, what are we doing as of late? FUCKING NOTHING, that's why people are leaving you retard

>>325239 The only thing I'm reading in your posts is projection, anon. Perhaps "you're only gossiping about ghazi shit" is not what happens but the only thing you notice and might give a shit about. I'll give you the fact that gghq is pretty much dead indeed, but that's because everybody else went to other places instead. Maybe if you stopped following burnouts and revolttards you'd notice. Quit using twitter as your barometer for gamergate's liveliness. Faggot.

>>325235 >>325239 >but with operations and digging you get to rekt those faggots IRL and make them pay for the shit they did by destroying their scams and revenue source >what are we doing as of late? FUCKING NOTHING . . . or you could post info you've dug up.

>>325238 >>325249 >namefagging >being a cunt when people disagree with you good job driving people away, shitfuck.

>>325259 8chan might not be the right place for people like you, anon.

>>325274 The fact that you are using an anonymous image board as a place to wave your dick around and feel good about yourself suggests that maybe your mom should be limiting your screen time more, li'l buckaroo.

Less arguing more posting shit from your gg folder i got a fuckton of shit but due to 8chan fucking up i can only post one image at a time The people are still around they just do most of their shit away from the #'s its not like you have to tag in a # evry single time you want to tweet anyway Think you can get this to run at the same time as the anniversary make it a dual strike

It's shitty but I made a small picture from the latest Based Mom video on gamergate. My tweet if you wanna fart it https://twitter.com/TheFrenchCritic/status/745723859773624320

>>324252 >>324254 Cute, the moment going after Big Media is suggested the Shills come in with the sliders.

>>324813 >implying shill namefags have power here.

>>325274 To be fair, namefagging is pretty frowned upon on here. A while back someone explained it by saying that having a name or tripcode basically turns this place into a regular message board. From what I recall, trips were okay if you were say, proven to be part of the industry or something and had contributed something useful rather than just verbal diarrhea.

the people that namefaged on the reg were aytists and they all got banned rather quickly mostly for being unsalvagable shitposters who decided not to be useful to anyone. Val at least tries and that's about it Is this still a thing or is this going to the pile of abandoned ops?

>>325473 Not abandoned. Not exactly. This was part of what sparked the idea for the big anniversary thing, and its still growing. If you want to draw more attention to this specific #OP, tweet about it and get people talking on Twitter.

>>325274 >Thread is literally about bringing more people in >HERP DERP YOU DON'T BELONG HERE >>325259 is right. You're fucking annoying. It's bad enough having to deal with obnoxious SJW pricks without adding your faggotry into the mix.

The right killed GG when they decided to push their shit onto us, using us as a platform. Nobody will ever take us serious again, not even the right, we are nothing but a convenient tool to them, we used to have the truth on our side but trust but verify seems to be a thing of the past now. I'm reasonably active but when i completely disagree with most of the shit posted in the name of GG my morale take nosedive and i very much doubt i'm alone in thinking that.

>>325695 >The right killed GG Yeah I'm petty sure that didn't happen. Nothing fucking killed GG, the SJWs learned to stop talking or are now focusing on other things.

>>323857 I endlessly regret not friending Liefschitz before he got dumped and went private on twitter, and later Chelsea & Randi during profile changes, and now recently with Kiva Bay ripping off kikestarter and cancelling the Feminist Deck.

>>324742 We will call upon you again when the time is right. You will know us by our sign. Rest, to fight again in some distant battlefield.

>>325697 If you can't see it you are fucking blind.

>>325707 Such a riveting and infallible argument! Fuck off, you can't even provide proof let alone say something that makes sense.

Bumping this dead thread for an important reason. https://8ch.net/pol/res/9046643.html GamerGate's spirit as metamorphosed into a greater meme. Here's your reason to Repopulate.

>>329801 I am extremely okay with this. The only minor disappointment is that they didn't just ask us first. People would jump at that shit, especially on /v/.

>>329802 I believe they are all ready conversing on /v/ but the /pol/ thread seems to be Ground Zero right now. If you've got diggers on call, now would be a good time to flash the bat signal. We've got cattle to slaughter.

>>329801 >>329802 What in the fuck does this have to do with ethics in video game journalism?

>>329827 Tearing down their idols read: sources of their bullshit, when it can be done by #GG's playbook, is never a bad thing anon.

>>329827 Nothing indeed. This is about how internet shitstorms operate in general. Anonymous, OpPayback, GG, Trump, PG.. Fun and exciting at first shit gets done, reinforced by streams of rank and file. Then it implodes on itself. The legion's gone, and so are the leaders, waiting for next thing to resonate. Why keep looking back anon, do you miss caturdays and chocolate rain? Like those SJWs who occasionaly coopt skeletons in the style of 'Anonymous are against SJW cause X'? That's not how we roll. Creative destruction is the only way to avoid stagnation. Yes, I know it's sometimes important to stay focused, but it is simply not practical with leaderless internet mob.

>>329801 Archive link since that thread is 404ed: http://archive.is/Vq8eV Though the OP in that thread doesn't seem to understand how laws regulating charities work. But that's hopefully change in the half month since that thread.