>>324499
>double dubs checked.
>Are you really getting upset over Mockingbird? Sure, the issue was a bit SJWy, but authors are allowed to have their own political opinions, and the whole issue was tongue in cheek, as you can see by the last panel.
Could be a case of allergic reaction, there has been a lot of hamfisted attempt in recent years that I think people's sense are maybe debateably overtuned to that. I agree that authors and creators should be able to have their own political opinions, at the same time the author in question iirc seemed to be a very left leaning politician so you can understand some of the suspicions. We'll get back to that point later, but I'll just say this. SocJus has been winding people up, wanting people to be "more sensitive", to the point of hypersensitivity.
Microagressions, manspreading, fartrape. It's gotta be a ruse cruise, please tell me the world has not gone that fully retarded. Well what happens when socjus own rules is applied to them? From what I've seen they either conveniently make up an exception for themselves, or get violently mad.
>One of SJWs failing is that they forget that subtle messages have a lot more power than in your face messages.
Quite agree. And as we can see from recent events ie: DePaul, that wil be one of their own undoings.
>You guys should really read the issue, it's right-wing if anything, mocking radical feminists and talking about how poor white people are oppressed and forced into extremist behavior.
That vid I linked, I should have more explicitly put an asterisk like:
Put aside the claim of politics he's talking about for a second, and focus instead on the idea of the HBO method subscription vs direct sales
Reason I say that is because there might be, a nearly identical structure between cliquebait vidya "journalists" with questionable ideologies that tries to be the editor and gatekeeper while shutting out actual readers and customers, and cliquebait comic\pop culture "journalists" with questionable ideologies that tries to be the editor and gatekeeper while shutting out actual players and customers. Ie: TheMarySue seemed to be very cozy with Joshskeesian.
>Maybe I should storytime it.
That's a breddy gud idea. Getting back to the point mentioned with creators and their right to their opinions. If you do storytime it, I'll have no problem reading the whole thing to get a better idea of it, since I hate it when socjus declares something problematic based only on a snapshot, I don't want to do the same. All that said, IMO OP has a right to be cynical and suspicious at this point.