>>241433
>It is when youre trying to use that as an argument.
No. It isn't. It is not relevant if there is a physical location where some of [x] exist if all of [x], worldwide, declare a PHYSICAL WAR upon another nation. "Tibet can't declare war against China because Tibet doesn't exist as an independent nation!" This is literally your "argument."
>Yes it did, you literally said.
Yes, and you cannot fucking read or understand it, apparently. I have already explained what the sentence means several times and you're still pretending it means something I explicitly said it does not mean.
>you always do this
1. I don't know who the fuck you are.
2. I don't care who the fuck you are.
3. You are literally doing what you claim I am doing.
>You literally said that.
Nope. You already had this explained to you, too. The UK did not want Germany dismantled BECAUSE it refused its peace offers. The UK refused Germany's peace offers BECAUSE it wanted it dismantled. Cart. Horse. 3rd grade reading comprehension.
>You jsut contradicted yourself you absolute moron.
Fine, 2nd grade reading comprehension, then.
>Against who? germany?
Good fucking god, learn what context clues are. To what did I JUST REPLY when I said that, you illiterate sack of shit? If "the people of the UK" were split on continuing the war, why didn't they put up a fight against their genocidal government? I'm not a limey, so I'm not as angry about that as I am about my own people who refused to disobey our own government's aggression in the war, despite polls at the time saying Americans didn't want it, either. The point is that clearly people didn't actually care about the war either way, or they did and they cared about going along with it.
>How shit you just contradicted yourself YET AGAIN
Because you are literally illiterate. I've explained it five fucking times already.
>The fact was that most of europe was under german occupation including british alies and protected nations
So... NOT BRITAIN, THEN. Your "argument" is that independent nations don't exist and they can't make any decisions for themselves. You're the same as the suicidal lunatics who created "mutual defense pacts" and have doomed the modern world to WWIII within the next 20 years, thanks to "promises" from one nation to defend another in a war for which no benefit or purpose is derived. It's madness. It's not a fucking excuse.
>Are you seriusly implying this is an acceptable peace?
Are you seriously implying you've never actually read Hitler's peace offers? Because that's the only way you'd be making these claims.
>You made that up
No, see, you're denying the rightful independence of nations. You're saying nations have no right whatsoever to put their own people's interests above those of other foreign nations.
Go ahead. Tell everyone how crucial it is that the West keeps sending tens of billions to the Ukraine to prop up their child trafficking hub puppet state. How we're "morally obligated" to do so. How it's "in our best interests" to ensure that queers and trannies and feminism are brought to the whole world. How literally changing our military first use nuclear policy is protecting our own fucking people. It's the same goddamn "argument."
>How the fuck would i be an hypocrite for something someone not related to me did way before i was born?
Are... you genuinely unable to think in the abstract? I'm asking for your PERSONAL VIEWS on a historical event and trying to ascertain whether you're unjustly (and perhaps unknowingly) biased by your present understanding thereof. It is hypocrisy to claim that the UK was justified in declaring war on Germany (due to its defense agreement with Poland) but that it was also justified in not declaring war on the USSR (which is a violation of said agreement). You clarified (thank you) that you said it was wrong of them not to, so you're not a hypocrite. THAT'S FUCKING ALL. You're not the one with your real finger on the real nuclear button right now. That's what a hypothetical situation is.
>Nigger this is fruitless, you have become beyond histeric
Illiteracy tends to rankle me, yeah. Get absolutely fucked, propagandist.
>cannot even make up your mind with what you say
Six times you've had it explained to you. This is your problem, not mine.
>[buzzwords because he can't defend his claims]
Do you think that will work?