>>71601
>a jew with gay mannerisms
Wait, do you mean Spock? Or Kirk? Which of them has gay mannerisms? The asian was pretty flamboyant, but neither of the jews seemed very gay. Of course, neither character is jewish, but the actors are, and I assume that's what you're referring to. Everyone seems taken for granted to be atheist, though there is the one reference to monotheism when they fight Apollo that seems like it was an edit demanded by the network, since otherwise the whole episode comes off as a screed against theism in general.
>a commie
Does Chekov ever make reference to communism or the USSR? He is Russian (and the butt of many jokes for that), but I don't think they ever refer to him being a commie. The show doesn't deal with economics very much in general, since it's basically about the space navy doing their jobs and meeting aliens, though there are merchants and stuff, like Harry Mudd or the guy who sells the tribbles, and they seem to be conducting free enterprise.
>a catholic
Are you getting scots confused with potatoniggers?
>a degenerate pussy hound
I never really understood how this perception of Kirk got started. He's a suave cool guy, and can manipulate women with his charisma when he needs to, but I don't recall any episodes where he is actually a degenerate pussy hound. There are a few episodes where he has different love interests, but he isn't very degenerate in them. I guess in Wrath of Khan he finds out he has a now-adult son he didn't know about, but that's not quite "original series" and it's also not portrayed as a random one night stand or something. Oh also there is the time in Star Trek IV where he basically seduced a woman from the 20th century to come with him to the future, then just never mentioned her again. That's pretty bad. But not quite "degenerate pussy hound," just kind of short sighted.
>niggers, spics and chinks are "just Americans"
Roddenberry was certainly a globalist, but not in the modern sense. He was a globalist in that he believed American culture was best and should take over the world. Everyone acts like Americans. Call it unrealistic if you will, it is sci-fi after all, but this is very different from acting like Uhura being african means that we need to respect 20th century african ooga booga "culture" as much as 20th century American culture. It was more like a view that American culture is so much better that eventually they will help the rest of the world (and the galaxy) catch up. In an early episode they even make reference to Vulcan being conquered due to their cultural differences from Earth (which just acts like America). Later they would back off and act like it's more of a partnership, but in the original series, America rules. And Klingons transparently represent commies.
But you're right that Voyager is SJW shit.
>>71602
Leftie in Roddenberry's lifetime is very different from today. He didn't like racism and he was very atheist, but there is little to support the idea he was a commie. He also didn't seem very feminist, what with casting his mistress in the show (after firing the previous female lead and saying it was because they couldn't afford that many characters). In the final episode of the original series, Kirk's ex girlfriend is the villain, out for revenge because she feels she wasn't allowed to become a captain because she is a woman. She is not portrayed sympathetically. Also the bad guy in The Motion Picture (the only one Roddenberry was allowed to have actual involvement in) is basically a giant space vagina, and I'm not quite sure what that means, but I don't think it's feminist.
>It wasn't until after he started stepping away from the show that we got the interpersonal development with the crew, as well as the more fun stuff like DS9 and the Borg.
It's also when you got all the SJW shit.
>>71603
>Do you realize that one of the underlying points of DS9 is all of the non-Federation races slowly watching their culture degrading in order to meet Federation's values.
Are you arguing that the Ferengi's loss of their culture is seen as a negative point? Because if not, then the point stands.
>>71605
>Chekov was deliberately added so that they could have Russian representation.
Yeah, and he is friendly with the American captain and other crew members. Russia exists, but they are no longer a threat. America won. They don't delve deeply into what happened, but it sure doesn't seem like the USSR won. They aren't all speaking Russian on that ship. They meet the ghost of Lincoln in space, not Lenin. They go to a planet that organically wrote an exact copy of the US Constitution, and the people are literally called Yankees, and the bad guys are literally called Communists, because the development of a culture like America is seen as the natural development of any human society.
>Hell, the story takes place after the Earth was nearly destroyed in WWIII.
Yeah, they don't act like things are perfect in the present, it is about a utopian future, but it isn't a communist utopian future.
>Roddenberry definitely subscribed to this believe of universal egalitarianism and made significant effort to showcase women and minority groups in positions of status even outside of the main cast.
Definitely, though note that though Number One could be First Officer, later episodes would imply women can't be Captains. Also, Khan might be some sort of not-quite-white guy (I still don't know if he's supposed to be ethnically indian or just swarthy like Montalban), but I don't think it's pushing much of a leftie message to say that a not-quite-white guy took over a significant part of the world, specifically including the not-white part he's supposed to be from. I don't think it's a leftie message to have it so Hitler II (or Napoleon III, as the episode seems to put it) isn't white. A modern show would most definitely have him be white (and probably blonde), and make that the point.
>>71606
>What does that change about everything I brought up?
You asked for where it was. It's there in the first episode. Blame NBC for not letting that version of the show go forward.
I understand that people here might be opposed to Roddenberry's atheism and dislike of racism, but his shows were certainly not communist, and while maybe you could make arguments that they displayed degrees of feminism, I'd argue it was very little. By modern standards, he'd be lynched for making it so Kirk's original love interest was Yeoman Rand. They'd say it was literally rape. And that's to say nothing of how the actress that played her got screwed (metaphorically) so that the "actress" that was already getting screwed (literally) could essentially take her job.