>>8586 Wish I could if there's any trained model on that stuff lol (especially pokephilia)

Inkcels have influenced pixiv to the point that using style LORAs may be banned in the future, it's over https://www.pixiv.net/info.php?id=9522

>>16090 idc about styles I just wanna know if I'll be able to keep genning characters in their OG artstyle

>>16090 There's no way to prove they are or aren't using an artist style lora (unless it is just brutally obvious but most cases won't be), they would either have to force AI uploads to also include all the information related to the generated image including what LoRA and model were used to be allowed to post them, or they would just have to accept all takedown requests put forward by artists without question just even if they were only suspicious.

>>16099 its immediately fucking obvious if you're using an artist style lora unless you go out of your way to make it look different, at which point there is no problem

>>16100 nah you can just lower the strength on it and get something of a mid-way and at that point i wouldn't call it obvious. "that looks kinda like my art but it's a bit wrong"

>>16100 >>16101 you can also get a lot of mileage out of mixing artist loras, along with low strength. I imagine the main issue that's been getting out of hand is the daily rankings page has quite of few entries that are blatantly ripping off compositions as well as art style.

>>16105 even better, run the txt2img through img2img on another artstyle.

how much do you guys take per commission and how much effort do you put into fixing things up?

>>16090 it's getting really old watching retards who aren't familiar with the chinese fail to blame the chinese. i guarantee you this was triggered by hundreds of bugmen trying to sell artist loras they baked and directly tagging the artists in the advertisements, just like the "loli ban" was triggered by chinese selling access to actual cp over pixiv and using gens for advertisements and plausible deniability.

>>16090 cant see this anywhere anymore, did they back outta it?

>>16195 It's still there for me. >>16105 AI generations shouldn't be included in daily art rankings, or should have an entirely seperate daily ranking. Even deviantart, despite being so deep in AI's pocket it'll never see the light of day again, hasn't gone so far as to start awarding daily deviations to AI pieces. (They may eventually, but right now they're showing restraint. Both deviantart and Pixiv have it set up that you are not allowed to actually block AI images from appearing, you can only reduce the number you see, which is no doubt an intentional method of gradually forcing acceptance.)

>>16090 Seems its over https://www.fanbox.cc/@official-en/posts/5934381

>>16324 yeah it's over, I just got a few paying customers for fanbox too, damn

So fanbox is dead which means no loli art at least on a safe site, only other sites I can think of is Gumroad but not sure if Loli is safe there.

Patreon is kill too

>>16384 at least wait till they say anything concrete. >>16341 subscribestar?

>>16384 I'm afraid the timing of the Patreon post is probably a very good hint at where this is going.

>>16512 At this rate I’m only making my money from Fiverr commissions but the garbage waiting time for funds to pass through is such a garbage thing to deal with

>>16530 I've never heard of anyone doing commissions through Fiverr. Have people actually gone for that for you?

>>16538 Yeah it’s usually newfags or redditors that don’t want to bake their own LORAs, usually goes well the only shit that sucks is that Fiverr takes a cut and then makes you wait more than a week for your money to be deposited

Apparently I jumped into the ship way too late, I was waiting for my followers count to grow up before opening a fanbox or some shit. Does anybody here use subscribestar or some alternatives? I need to at least try to make some bucks so I can afford a good GPU and stop using cloud shit, it's just matter of time until the free machines shut down just like g**gle did.

it's fucking over https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/13wr880/pixiv_restricts_the_use_of_ai_new_rules/

>>17325 They came down much harder than I expected.

>>17325 If they don't go overboard with enforcing the style rule, the changes are good.

>>17330 yeah i'm curious about that. say if you're using a dragon ball character lora, how close is too close to the original style? will you just not be able to do fanart at all? if you can't do on model goku, or photoreal goku, is a goku that looks like a pixar character fine or is that stealing from pixar?

Hi hdg bros this is my pixiv https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/94794342

>>17325 >>17333 keep me posted if anyone gets banned for this. I think it *should* be fine to post characters in their OG style, well, I hope it is at least.

>>17393 >>17340 Fucking garbage.

>>17397 kill yourself nigger faggot

anyone uploading works when using artists/style LORAs getting hit by Pixiv's new rules yet?

>>17503 theres dudes that have fanbox with photoreal smolis...

pixiv users

>>17960 I'm almost certain that it's a shitpost

https://twitter.com/skbjijii https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/96264320 Just starting out, I plan to do lots of loli (as well as non-loli too).