I ran into that too, its like the flood timer resets every time you try to post or something.

>>1337 It's in progress, it's only been like 2 days. >>1341 I have this same issue occasionally

>>1341 yeah, like if you try it even one second too early, it re-rolls the time you have to wait again think it's only like that for threads, idk >>1342 >It's in progress, it's only been like 2 days cool, I'll check back

also, very nice btw still giggle at this one

>>1343 I'm learning everything about it from scratch pretty much, and researching everything from how to get it all installed and working, to operating costs and logistics of getting that done. It's a lot of information to go through so there's no solid timeline. Right now I'm looking into fastflux vs. nginx on a second reverse proxy server. Fuck cuckflare.

>>1345 >Fuck cuckflare. the only problem with that is ddosing cris on corona tried to not use cuckflare there, patch was ddosing him offline constantly til he started using cuckflare doesn't seem to be any easy solutions

>>1346 How does 8kun do it? Do they have their own solution?

>>1347 kun uses some other service, can't remember the name but it's essentially another cuckflare all I remember is their animated logo that hilariously makes a perfect star of david for like one frame

>>1346 Precisely why I'm looking into it so thoroughly instead of just slapping lynxchan on some random offshore server. Cost is also a factor in the short term, so it may be that the immediate solution is to use something like decentraleyes to mitigate most of my cuckflare concerns. nginx is the same as cuckflare though, afaik so far

>>1347 only one I'm aware of with a custom solution is cutie, pretty sure they made their own alternative

>>1349 definitely wise to take your time and do it thoroughly before even opening it tbh, with fags like patch and others it's sure to start getting hit right away if it looks to be successful

>>1346 buyvm offers ddos protected IPs that can deal with booters pretty well (upto 3500gbit/s they claim)

>>1351 >>1352 If it happens, it'll be done right. 'ate niggers 'ate antis 'ate normalfags luv me lgs luv me pedocock simple 'as

>>1352 >they claim idk about buyvm inparticular but corona tried the server-built-in ddos prot a couple times, didn't do shit to stop patch

I wonder, since the usual way is to send a large amount of packets, is to just block pings by default or use QoS on incoming traffic to just prioritize normal-looking traffic for people using the site

>>1337 1337 get my dude idk when site BO said he was thinking about it and how to do it >>1353 fookin norf cunt

also btw we did good 8moe lies in ruins acid and mark might have stayed unlike jewsh but it's because they have nowhere else to go

>>1365 >8moe lies in ruins I wouldn't say that. Hugbox circlejerks are notoriously hard to destroy, and acidcuck and mark have built enough orbiters to keep themselves going for another 3 or 4 years or so, before the population dwindles too much.

>>1367 Being a retard talking about gaygaymergaygaygay like it's a thing that exists ~7 years after it mattered, as a fat guy that looks like this picture 1:1 with another fat guy, and corralling a userbase of <1000 people who continually rehash the same exact conversation about whether they're pedos when they fap to loli or not 24/7 is a very dismal fate. Josh is doing better, he's living on his own in like Eastern Europe or something and might actually be able to go find a fairly ugly white woman and have little neko shotas of his own to hurtcore to get back at that one bitch on Blockland.

>>1370 forgot to insert post link >>1314 thicc boi here this is actually Acid seent it

Cakejew and cuckjew will never find the holy grail of an above-board Nintendo Power that will tell them the raw truth on which bing bing makes them wahoo the most, in contrast. Dreams forever unfulfilled. Mark will at least be able to cope by continuing to buy every product Nintendo releases regardless of quality, but Acid will probably an hero.

/v/ is only one board too look what the rulecucking did to /b/ barely gets posts zzzchan /b/ probably pulling most of those that didn't come here and that personally buttblasts the kikemins because they hate zzz since like every other site they hate they fear losing their userbase to them

>>1370 >a very dismal fate It's the fate they chose. They'll circlejerk and rulecuck themselves down to the same 10~ ultra retard userbase population sooner or later before they eventually manage to puzzle out what they did wrong, if they ever do. Just stop giving it your mindspace, my man. Chill, try to find another acceptable imageboard, wait for smolbox, or do any number of other things except give this shithole attention (outside of this board) Also, wait, hold the fuck on. This is entirely off-topic to this in specific, but I just realized something. Why are they all continuously crying that /hebe/ will somehow get the entire webring shuttered by imaginary feds? Wasn't the entire point of the webring being decentralized platforms specifically so that no one could nuke the entire OG concept of 8chan off the internet?

>>1373 last time I checked zzz was pretty rulecucked and dead too

>>1375 smolbox is based as fuck for having the name smol in it god I hope we use that isn't that fucking based and convenient for me lmao and because they are fags - answers everything. NEWfags, at that. >>1376 It is but I've seen even that spastic who is the BO leave sfw pics and stock images up, so it's less rulecucked than this /b/ although we got the /b/ BO thrown out too btw it's the old retard now instead of kazoo

>>1378 they all took 8moe from the webring over this board so I'd assume they'd never allow a board like this or threads discussing these things on their sites. acid might be a cuck but that doesn't make them any better tbh.

>>1380 At least their cuckery is hurting acid, cucks vs.cucks is a game everyone wins. It's like when cops kill niggers, niggers kill cops, or antis kill eachother.

>>1347 >>1348 8kun uses Vanwatech which has servers on Russia or another similar shithole. The problem with it is that they aren't reliable with sites hosting content involving minors because they bend to the Russian government's tantrums over lolicon and similar shit. 8moe went Tor-only for a couple of days because Vanwa kicked out the site because Putin wanted /delicious/ and /tot/ dead. Ironically Cuckflare cares less about loli/pedo stuff than other alternatives, in part because they're so big that smol (heh) sites using their services for "bad things" don't affect their overall business (unless they generate a lot of bad PR, like 8chan did after the 3rd mass shooting). >>1349 >it may be that the immediate solution is to use something like decentraleyes to mitigate most of my cuckflare concerns I don't know about networks and CDN, but I'm sure things like decentraleyes and localcdn are only to replace external content (jquery, react, angular, googleapis, icon packs, etc) with versions stored locally in the client's PC. It improves your privacy accessing sites that use cuckflare, google and other companies' shit, but I don't think it can be used as a replacement for real CDNs for your server. >>1370 >Josh is doing better, he's living on his own in like Eastern Europe or something and might actually be able to go find a fairly ugly white woman and have little neko shotas of his own to hurtcore to get back at that one bitch on Blockland. wut

>>1388 >wut I'm just done with 8chan.moe because there are people on that site, who know me from the CIA, I know they know me from it because they use nodes and shit that someone familiar with CIA would be using. In sequence with like child pornography and dumping pictures of child models and stuff on the site. The same guy will post 200 times every single day just talking about how much he wants to fuck kids. And the only reason he does it is because I run the site. That in and of itself would not force my hand to do anything, but the problem is, with that kind of behavior you can't grow the site. The site has been stagnant and it won't grow because if there is pro-pedophile content on the site, the webring won't link to it. And it's not possible, with the parameters that I've set, for how I want my imageboard to be run, to effectively moderate that out of the site. I can't ban someone from a site that allows Tor. And if a guy is willing to sit there and bust out a captcha code every single post while posting from Tor, just so that he can say how much he loves fucking kids and who his favorite child model is, there's nothing I can do to stop that. If it's a truly dedicated schizophrenic who just fucking hates me I cannot win that fight. And that I'm definitely not having fun with anymore.

>>1392 saved

>>1375 >their fate Christ, all this has been like having some droning godawful dirge in my ears finally stop as I just realised how fucking long it's been going. This place was always supposed to be temporary, coming here was like retreating to a rat infested ramshackle hut. >webring They don't give a fuck, they'd have used any excuse, their userbase (rightly) hates Mark so much they freaked out like the spazzes here over some cherrypicked posts and piled on similar anti pressure on their badmins to cut the place out again. Much like here they've gone unchallenged, in terms of actually having to fucking think, for a good while now so they're just as pisspants scared of people even having a discussion about something they don't like.

>>1337 Digits Yeah this is the last straw for me too OP. It's too much to see retards defending, nay cheerleading IRL censorship out of one side of their mouth while decrying that their shit console loli ass games get cuckcensor bars and lightbeams all over them. Poor lambs, must be hard having a brain both that smooth and that dense. If they don't think loli is pedo they should be able to show their loli folders to their mothers.

>>1388 When I mentioned tools like decentraleyes, I was in fact referring to the privacy of users. My primary objectives with the site are, in no particular order: >Freeze peach to the greatest extent possible or barring that, as unrulecucked as possible >Privacy/Anonymity for users to the greatest degree possible, fuck botnet niggers >Gatekeeping, without which the site would basically be born with aids If I can achieve all three I believe that the audience will come on their own, no need to shill the site past it's introduction

>>1404 we need totposting totposting kills all opposition janny, granny, grannyfucker, (g*d forbid, jannyfucker) all fear the tot.

for gatekeeping I mean with enough tots everyone that is a cunt will leave except for me because of all of the tots but if you don't let me come do it then I'll do it anyway

Stupid /v/ modniggers deleting anything that's even vaguely critical of the place now. They're gonna be left with nothing but a hardcore of trash.

>>1486 >muh freeze peach Why would you want to have the ability to voice dissent and criticism, that's what bad faith actors do. Wouldn't you much rather have a forum where everybody says the same exact thing and has the same discussion over and over again, without any significant deviation being tolerated?

>>1486 They really deleting anything that conflicts with their beliefs, lol. Sad.

>>1488 Imagine thinking it's okay to express yourself. You are clearly a glownigger, because you are not in line with acceptable thought. This post is probably part of a government conspiracy to take down all of 8moe.

Can anyone name some on-topic sites?

>>1488 It's so insane. Deep down they must know there's some truth to these arguments and they can't possibly deny everything without huge mental gymnastics so they try their best at suppressing the discussion of the topic and pretend like loli is never pedo because they say so.

>>1491 If they had a counterargument, they would make it. Nobody ever censors lies or falsehoods.

>>1491 You can just stop spamming and invite people to have an argument here instead of shitting up other boards.

>>1493 I'm not spamming but you seriously deserve it for removing entire conversations just because you disagree with it.

>>1491 It's beyond retarded, I called the place a 'shithole' in a one line off the cuff on-topic post and it got delet. There's no point posting there anymore they don't want users they want cattle.

>>1495 >As if the (((Jews))) haven't got cattle through shit like Twitter or Kikebook... Come on anon, be smart! But eh, whatever. I get where they are coming from. But just like furries where their porn is really half there with animal porn, so is loli to some extent. Either way, who cares? Let them waste their life, as both furry and loli won't be banned in the foreseeable future most likely.

john won

>>1497 who?

>>1496 >Either way, who cares They seem to have a pretty extreme anti-tier opinion on pedos what makes the whole thing even more ridiculous. And engaging antis in an argument to make them look foolish is never entirely pointless.

>>1499 They make themselves look foolish on their own: >engage in circular reasoning >consistently fail to elaborate on any point >never provide sources for things they claim are facts >dismiss all sources not in their favor out of hand as "propaganda" without looking >argue like jews as though their own words were not archived for everyone to see a few posts above them

Make the case for /interracial/ to be deleted. At least one good thing could happen.

>>1487 I know rite? Guess I should go get my Star of David brand and buy a gateaux for my oberlord. >'bad faith actors' In the future I think anyone saying this unironically, needs to be watched like a hawk cos they're just trying to shut down discussion they don't like, I've only ever seen paranoid idiots with no argument use it. >>1496 With that fat kike getting his retarded potato-face on tv and constantly trawling twitter for nu-fags it's no wonder the place has gone down the fucking toilet, not that it wasn't on the rim of the bowl to begin with.

>>1501 >The case for interracial to be deleted I think it should stay so that you can tell at a glance what 8moe really is. But in a general case, having an interracial board is usually the product of offsite agenda. There are posts on interracial coordinating action on other sites already, and the next step would be other boards (especially porn boards). It's almost always politically motivated and usually attracts the exact crowd of people that destroy sites by turning them into rulecucked shitholes, or barring that one of many other routes. In short, it attracts a crowd that is bad for the health of a site, antagonizes other people and makes you enemies, creates cancerous instead of healthy site growth, and will eventually kill your site when they leave for the next parasitic host. Also, something something white power save the west etc etc, we all know that part already.

>>1504 Yes, and yet they're more concerned about this board.

Seems they hardly will get anything besides being annoying pests at best. And if by rulecucking you mean in terms of allowing only the fictional shit but not the actual shit? That's most places since fiction is better than reality and no one gets harmed in the long run like gore.

>>1504 >checks cuckchan boardlist >washes self thoroughly They don't even have a fucking Interracial board, holy shit, the fucking state of this place.

>>1505 Well, theres all the CP spam going on here and the fact that we are all one single poster spamming the niGGer thread, and also glowniggers conspiring to take out both 8moe and destroy GaymerGape once and for all, and also just generally bad faith actors, and also a honeypot to catch pedos in a 4000iq 86 dimensional backgammon play by acid So overall I'd say we're an enormous threat to them. Much more so than politically motivated IR porn spammers, creating and spreading anti-white propaganda at the behest of an ideology made from (((them))) and cultural marxist subversive tactics showing results after the end of the cold war, who are obsessed with destroying the west and the white race and are a subset of the people niGGers and anons alike were originally in bitter conflict with.

>>1507 >cuckchan I think there are multiple sites that fit this description, are you referring to halfchan?

>>1508 >all the CP spam I've not seen one image that's even been iffy, I don't claim it hasn't happened but you'd think it was flowing freely in every post rather than non-existent given how much hyperbolic bullshit fags on other boards are imagining is happening here and spreading that conception to others who swallow it whole. >>1509 Yus.

>>1510 It's probably one disingenuous faggot trying to slander or somebody stirring the pot, and the rest of the retards never checked and just assumed it was true because that post didnt get deleted. At most, they were screeching about some slightly risque images of older hebe (barely even pedo range according to anybody sane), and a few fully clothed pictures of children, and saying that it was CP. The result of that are the current cucked rules where all 3D images of under 18 are banned, including stock photos, as well as "realistic" art and 3DCG based on real children. For an image of a young-looking person to be allowed, proof of age is literally required or it will be deleted.

This site is not fit to house anons, should probably not have hung around here the more I think on it.

>>1512 A new site is apparently in the works but no real news on that yet. Is there another site that is actually good? At best I would expect a marginally less shit one.

>>1512 Then leave this place anon. Let it rot and die.

>>1511 There was actual CP spam on GG right after the pedo general on /b/ got banned. Mostly naked children and an bit of porn too. It stayed up for hours because the mods were asleep at the time, even though they were quite active, so a lot of people saw.

>>1513 Yes, Kohlchan. It's /int/ only though. More active than the entire webring, and make sure to not call people anon there.

>>1515 So what you are saying is that despite not even existing yet, /hebe/ is responsible for this and not the retarded jannies antagonizing users?

>>1515 What the fuck...

>>1517 Well I'm sure whoever spammed all that probably does browse here. Probably wouldn't have happened anyway if it weren't for niGGers being so enraged in the first place and the general would be left alone.

>>1511 bUt ThE iNtEnT mAtTeRs!

>>1517 I mean, supposedly a /hebe user was found out on this board to admit that they had actual CP in his folder, and not to mention that he did get the global rules changed and got a /b thread deleted. Sure, maybe it was just one guy. But either way, should have chosen a different name if people didn't want have problems here.

>>1511 bUt ThE iNtEnT mAtTeRs!

>>1519 So guilt by asscociation for a retaliation for an unprovoked attack on us? >>1521 >admitted to having CP and WE are the glowniggers lmao

>>1520 >>1522 >anti busts into the conversation >claims it harms children >refuses to elaborate further >leaves

>>1519 Eh, I doubt it. Some users just love doing shady shit like that. Whoever it was, that was just fucking sick and should be hanged imo. Sure, just a simple ban and all, but you don't want your site to be fucking reminded as a CP crap site would you?

>>1525 >sick and should be hanged spotted the niGGer

>>1526 I meant the one kikefucker who posted the actual shit mate. Not your legal teen shit.

>>1527 I only care because of legality.

>>1527 Just ban /interracial/ and keep /hebe/, why can't we all just get along?

>>1527 anti niGGer, all children are beautiful and pedophiles arent sick. Go see the big wall of facts and sources in the rules thread to see why a) cp reduces the rate of (((child sex crimes))) b) pedophilia is not a mental illness Having CP does not make you a monster, being a pedophile does not make you a monster, get bent niggerfaggot.

>>1521 Hi, I'm the hebe spammer. I'm not even from this site; I'm only here until Anonib comes back up because I prefer sites that aren't ran by Saudi faggots. I have nothing against /hebe/ and understand that their hands are tied; also, bashing everyone because I am posting LEGAL TEENS is pretty idiotic. This isn't some conspiracy against you or your shit website. I'm just a bored, autistic pedophile with no ties to anyone on this board (nor do I truly care if the site gets taken down or not). Also, don't worry about what I may or may not have on my computer :).

>>1531 Remember to use deniable encryption!

>>1531 >saudis The difference is that saudis tend to hide their roasties away while the depraved average burger wants to shove as much expired roastie meat in your face as he can while punishing you for showing interest in true beauty and innocence.

>>1533 ww3 cant come soon enough

>>1531 You aren't the one hes talking about, the one who caused all the drama was the baby fucker posting toddlers and babies on /v/. Its safe to assume the mod banned him for wrongthink first and thats what prompted the response of posting photos and eventually CP but lets be real both of them are the kind of obnoxious faggot that this site is better off without.

>>1535 Shut up kazu

>>1535 Lol do you think you blend in? Nepis are based.

>>1536 I called him an obnoxious faggot, what makes you think I am him? Because I'm not a tribalistic moron that will jump at the opportunity to play defense for someone who nearly got us deplatformed from the entire site? Sure I'm with the hebe poster in that I don't really give a shit whether this site lives or dies since its too cucked to ever see any kind of success anyway but I'm not about to defend some narcissistic cunt who thinks they can just come here and single handedly jeopardize the already tenuous relationship between mods and pedos because he was butthurt over an easily evaded ban.

>>1538 >tribalistic literally the entire world is out to get pedos and that alone is reason enough to be "tribalistic" and take care of our own. I will absolutely jump to the defense of any pedo, nepis included, and I would hope that others would do the same for me. Infighting weakens us and makes it easier to attack us, which is what you seem to want since you are calling nepis babyfuckers among other things. >jeapordize and then we go to another place, or make our own place, because this was a question of "when" and not "if" >butthurt over an easily evaded ban torturing tranny jannys and rulecucks is unfathomably based

>>1541 >Infighting weakens us and makes it easier to attack us, which is what you seem to want since you are calling nepis babyfuckers among other things. "nepis" weaken us and make it easier to attack us, the fact that I don't want that anymore is the entire reason why I make a strong distinction between them and us at every opportunity. >then we go to another place, or make our own place, because this was a question of "when" and not "if" "when" exactly do you think this question of "when" will be for you to feel so confident in eroding what little platform we have left right now? >torturing tranny jannys and rulecucks is unfathomably based They can be tortured in clever ways that don't create new enemies for us on this site.

>>1544 >nepis weaken us lol see your still doing it you faggot. I bet you think if you try to make yourself look more "normal" you'll be left alone? That antis distinguish the age of children? That they wouldnt see your AoA as the same as nepi AoA? You are no different than a niGGer that crusades against pedos to protect their lolicon. Pointing the finger at someone and saying "but theyre worse" is going to make exactly zero difference. >what little platform lol. lmfao. you think this is our last bastion or something? do you have any idea how easy it is to just move sites once this place is in the ground? how many dedicated pedo forums are up and alive right now? what we do here has very little, if any, impact because the only people on this site are pedos, niGGers, and interracial porn addicts. >new enemies >new you are delusional

>>1544 Divisive kikery, you already have the lolifags separated from us now leave us be and remove free speech on /v/

>>1546 This, it's like they think we can't fucking tell who they are and what they are trying to do. As if we are suddenly going to turn on each other, as if our common struggle doesnt bond us closer than any anti will ever be to a granny

>>1546 PS whats the font and the effect on the "fuck" it looks really cool

>>1545 People like me were normal and left alone in the past so its no big stretch to assume we can be again in the future, baby fuckers never have been so theres no reason to assume they ever will be and as long as we continue to allow their association with us then we'll be in the same boat as them forever. >>1546 You don't know the first thing about me, I've personally brought more lolifags into the fold than even exist on this site because I know what they actually like. I don't post babies in diapers at them to reinforce in their mind how separate they are from pedos because pedos are sickos that want to fuck babies and since they don't they must not be pedos. I show them what pedos actually like and since deep down they are actually pedos they will actually like it whether they choose to admit it to themselves at the time or not.

>>1549 >People like me were normal A very, very long time ago you would be "normal". Not for several generations now, though, so it's a moot point. >We'll be in the same boat with them forever Fear isn't going to work uncle tom. We know your game and your routine and it's never going to work. >You don't know the first thing about me is this a new pedo copypasta?

>>1549 >>Thinks fucking a 6-12 year old was ever deemed as fine >>History begs to be different Idk what to tell you fool, but no where in history did actual kids have been married and fucked at those ages. Just BS, lol. But please, do give me more of your fights. If you think loli and tot shit in the realm of fiction should be banned, I can say you redeem yourself.

>>1551 >nowhere in history did actual kids have been married and fucked at those ages this is a very bold claim, and very bad english. Are we gonna pretend that kids weren't getting married off in the middle ages? Are we gonna pretend that pedophiles are somehow a new, contemporary phenomenon? Literally the ancient greeks used to "mentor" young boys by lying naked with them. It goes back to the dawn of fucking mankind.

>>1550 >>1551 Theres still places in the world today where its not abnormal to have a child bride in which you consummate the marriage before she can even conceive yet.

>>1552 It's a fucking claim that is saying that those ages won't come back to any era in the future. And for fucking good reason, said kids didn't enjoy that shit and are still fucking developing at those ages. Really? A man can fuck a 6 year old at that age? Where the fuck is this shit at? Disgusting. They can't even fucking reproduce yet either, so they are just a sex doll. Jesus, thank fucking glad I am drinking right now... >>1553 Wrong ad those places better not be allowing sex at those ages either.

>>1554 >the same tired anti argument that kids cannot enjoy/consent to/etc sex because society told me so Go read >>93 this argument has been ripped apart enough already

>>1554 >those places better not be allowing sex at those ages either Or what, you'll start a holy war against them? Their adherence to religious morality is the main reason why they still think its normal when the rest of the world no longer does.

>>1556 >he thinks morality is ever based on something rational lol

>>1557 >Rational >Religion, an institution based on faith regardless of the particulars Though the way his post reads it sorta comes off as relativist desu

>>1558 Good, because it was meant that way.

>>1557 I never said that, I specified religious morality because its seen to be objective whereas secular morality is seen as subjective, so obviously a highly religious society in an increasingly secular world will see itself get left behind morally while the secular societies engage in untested social experiments.

>>1559 Relativism is retard. "Everything is relative" is literally an absolute statement. Let me break down the logic. Given: >Everything is relative >If it is not relative than it is absolute Then: >Everything is relative >The above statement is relative >"Everything is relative" is not always true >"Everything is relative" must sometimes be false >Only some things are relative >Some things are not relative >If something is not relative, it is absolute >Some things are absolute >Everything is relative is a false statement Morality needs to be universal to function, without being universal morality is meaningless. For morality to be universal, a central moral authority must exist. Without religion, there is no central moral authority. Without religion, there is no morality, not because it is the source of morality but because it is the authority on morality to which people can look to.

>>1554 >said kids didn't enjoy that shit Any proof? You talked to all of them?

>>1561 >morality can't be relative, because if you say everything is relative language is relative as well Kek now that is what you call logic, retard. Oh and everything definitely is morally relative, btw. You're correct, btw, morality is useless and nothing but an evolutionary tool. You seem to have some really shitty, senseless beliefs.

>>1562 He has no proof, no anti has proof, because there is no proof.

>>1563 A complete misunderstanding of what is written. The language is not relative, it's absolute. The definitions are the same in all cases, literally the opposite of relativism. If language were relative it would be impossible to communicate because words would different things to everybody, and thus everything you say would be misinterpreted. >morality is an evolutionary tool >evolutionary tool >nature follows man-made code of ethics my fucking sides

>>1565 >implying genetics don't influence culture >implying I was talking about genetic evolution in the first place And you really can't blame me for misunderstanding you as all you posted was an incoherent word salad, filled with our retarded opinions that you take as facts. Didn't say language was relative either. I don't really want to bother arguing with you right now, as you're a schizo and I'm just about to go to sleep. Maybe tomorrow I will bother to decipher your autism and respond to it seriously.

>>1566 >word salad >>>/reddit/ >filled with our retarded opinions that you take as facts what is this supposed to mean? >Didn't say language was relative either >>1563 "because if you say everything is relative langauge is relative as well" you brought it up, and you argue like a jew >incoherent Point out the incoherencies and I will correct them, then, so that you can understand. >I don't want to bother arguing with you right now only took a few posts, why start then? did you think this was /v/ and the mods would just delete the opposition and you could claim victory immediately? >you're a schizo ad hominem, not what schizo means, cope >Maybe tomorrow I will bother to decipher your autism and respond to it seriously and seethe and dilate. 404 argument not found. and I'm sure you didn't recognize it but the above logic can also be represented in terms of math, if you had spotted a genuine error it would have been trivial for you to dismantle it, but you didn't and instead called me names and then left, so I win :^) relativism is the philosophy of retards and cowards, and thats an absolute

This thread is fucking giant since I last saw it this morning, /hebe/ pph ridiculous. t. tot chad didn't read the last half of it

>>1568 Anti tried turning pedos against nepis but it didnt work because nepis are too based, post more cute tots!

>>1570 anyone that doesn't like tots is evil not sexually but I mean if you don't at least think they are cute and think they should be cherished and loved I don't trust tot haters

>>1572 Anybody who hates any child is a vile monster, and that of course includes tots. People who want to harm children (like robbing them of their autonomy or denying them the love they need and deserve) instead of making them feel loved (with cunny licks and other assorted physical affections)

>>1573 *are evil and I hate them

>>1565 >If language were relative it would be impossible to communicate because words would different things to everybody, and thus everything you say would be misinterpreted. Sounds like most political and social arguments atm and about 90% of the arguments and denunciations that go along with this topic are rooted in a misinterpretation of definitions, antis think 'pedophilia' means actually fucking kids when it doesn't but they'll still argue using those terms when they get heated. So to a fucking moron language *is* relative because they're too stupid to know how to communicate intelligently, or don't care to accurately articulate ideas they've deemed 'too icky' which explains why they rarely do, just a quick brainfart of 'kys pedo' then some maybe a histrionic appeal to emotion coupled with their latent repressed bloodlust coming to the fore. Horribly there are a lot of morons so language as a whole being raped and ruined by their stupidity means it *is* becoming harder to communicate, the coupling of their natural stupidity and their wilful stupidity makes trying is much use as shouting over a jet engine. They just need to be bombarded with undeniably hot lgs and their stupid non arguments crumble in the face of reality. It's interesting to watch an anti whip themselves into a foment over a conversation >Idk what to tell you fool, but no where in history did actual kids have been married and fucked at those ages (6-12) Just BS lol This is someone who's not heard of old euro monarchies marrying children off as preteens to members of their own extended families no less, who missed some very salient info the absolute free-for-all that was the the Americas when they were discovered, tanned up girls as young as 10 running out to shore to offer their cunts to the new arrivals with their older sisters, who has not heard of the Old West in murrika where we've all seen the pics of the happy couple who 'got to home makin'. Who doesn't realise it was all mostly swept under the rug worldwide until the 60s with Jerry Lewis and then really until the late 80s when actual laws started getting passed against it. >Disgusting. >Jesus, thank fucking glad I am drinking right now... Or what? He'd throw his computer out the window like an overgrown child? Hears 'arranged marriages of kids is still common' >Wrong ad those places better not be allowing sex at those ages either. There's no talking sense to people who've never bothered to look for the truth and only believed what they've been told or wanted to believe. If the true nature of the world were revealed to him his brain would have a fucking prolapse. >those places better not Or he's GONNA PUT HIS FOOT DOWN GUISE that'll learn those countries.

>>1572 >>1573 You're mistaking my hatred of you for a hatred of what you want to fuck. I'm an "anti" to you precisely because I value their autonomy and their right to make their own choices, something they can't do at the point in which you decide to select them as your personal sex object. When I look at the relationship I'd like to have compared to the norm theres really no difference between how I'd behave in either scenario, but compare them to a "relationship" with a 2 year old and it becomes clear how apples to oranges of a comparison you are to us and how one sided your "relationships" are.

>>1573 >>1574 based and pilled especially cute lil chubby babies and tots >>1576 The only kind of objects I think nepi girls should be is objects of worship.

>>1577 Do you normally stick your dick in the ass of the objects you worship? Because that just looks like someone using a baby as a sex object to me.

>>1578 that's a drawing for people that love babies to fap to because of the fantasy you could engage in such a way with them and there be mutual pleasure it is an impossible fantasy but other methods of worship are not

>>1577 On my shit monitor, the thumbnail looked like the baby has retarded fat pink lips Also she's bald and ugly and her skin is too dark. If those were lips, she'd be an incredibly ratchet ganguro girl

I like it because of the paci and how she looks chubby in the right places + her lil feet mope antidrawing butthurter

also anti-drawing niGGers confirmed too poor to afford quality monitor or worse they chose to skimp on it for their consolecuck'ry

>>1551 Third party analysis breakdown of this post: >Idk what to tell you Admission of lack of knowledge >fool Assumption of superior intelligence >but no where in history did actual kids have been married and fucked at those ages Unchecked, wholly inaccurate statement to reinforce the modern, very recent legal status change as if it were the only one to ever exist. >Just BS. lol Dismissal of the very concept, with nothing to back it up. Attempt to reduce it to laughable. >If you think loli and tot shit in the realm of fiction should be banned, I can say you redeem yourself. FOR HE IS THE GREAT REDEEMER, SAVER OF SOULS, LORD AND MASTER OF ALL HER SURVEYS, HE KNOWS ALL, SEEK NO KNOWLEDGE BUT IS FOR IT IS COMPLETE. >>1554 A cauldron of blistering impotent unnecessary anger, blithe dismissal, with no thought to learn, so up his own hole he threatens multiple countries when he's drinking. :^)

>>1585 >FOR HE IS THE GREAT REDEEMER, SAVER OF SOULS, LORD AND MASTER OF ALL HER SURVEYS, HE KNOWS ALL, SEEK NO KNOWLEDGE BUT IS FOR IT IS COMPLETE. autism have more todcon from an doujin i like

>>1586 too androgynous but whatever.

>>1588 rude

>>1583 I'm literally marrying one of you autists, don't go labeling anyone that thinks differently an anti All you do is divide your own base

>>1591 if you hate babies gfytdugkfmrjn

>>1592 >pull anon's cheeks >they start talking like their cheeks are being pulled You are absolved of all sins, I forgive you from the depth of my heart

>>1593 say nice things about tots

>>1594 Love eating tots

>>1594 They're small, requiring less space and calories to be kept alive They can be drawn with unrealistically long hair >>1596 Tater tots are just trash hashbrowns Would rather eat raw potato

>>1596 it was entrapement hooneyedpot your arse is garse niggynig your days are numbers - acid man

but yeah tots are best

>>1600 dubs of truth

>>1580 But the other methods of "worship" are still sex acts committed onto them with no regard for their choice or lack thereof in the matter.

>>1604 nope both to 'all other methods of worship' and to 'no regard for their choice or lack thereof in the matter' we've been down this road in /pg/ you are too autistic to understand nonverbal cues tots learn yes/no before any other words other than maybe mama/dada or something you are butthurt tots are best

>>1605 Yeah down the road of animal fucking in which you still couldn't demonstrate how a non-verbal cue from an animal establishes consent and isn't just solely based around your interpretation of the cue.

>>1607 Do they have it opposite here? When I was debating the loli ban on 8kunt I posted these two images and only the lolicon got deleted. Would be funny if they deleted the painting instead here so we could have 2 retardedly rulecucked versions of 8chan that both think they're abiding by the law and that the other one is breaking it.

>>1609 also your first pic is an boye

>>1611 At best the only thing your "proof" showcased was a trained animal, not an animal begging to be fucked. >>1612 According to what?

>>1614 >According to what the benis >at best you literally admitted you don't even understand horse behavior revisionism is kike shit kill self anti

tots love milk

>>1615 "muh dick" isn't an argument and that artist painted portraits of boys too, that just isn't one of them.

>>1617 >muh dik he has a benis that's an argument for it being a boy >>1612 >>1609 look at the benises look at em are you blind or something

antis confirmed for dysfunctional in all ways t. already knew it when they hated tots

>>1618 This is 2021 there are no more genders. You can be whatever you want to be now, anon

>>1622 legally married to a qt bbygirl

>>1624 >her daddy's cum >shitskin >babby and girl have pink skin wtf

the 6 month old drinking cummies part is good though

>>1626 yeah it's retarded.

we need smolbox for uncuckerizing because I want to post cute sfw tots and make that anti kill himself

>>1635 I haven't seen a single anti here, I don't think they'll see it

>>1637 see >>1614 >>1608 >>1604 >>1578 this nepi hating anti

also despite saying 'well we won't care when they leave for the /hebe/ site' guarantee the gaymergayim are gonna follow us and post asshurt

>>1638 That... doesn't look anti, that just looks like a discussion Some hebes/pedos don't have a thing for tots

>>1640 he doesn't have to have a thing for tots read up more you will be able to spot him from his total inability to conceive of a tot enjoying pleasure or inability to escape from his worldview where they are objects (the antipedo space.) Were you in the /b/ /pg/ threads? he made a point to never shut up about it there and constantly try to turn everyone against nepis

>>1641 I only dipped in when gaypedoboy was chasing pedo cock, for the most part Bless his heart. A long while ago I thought there were some interesting talks about something, but I forget what.

>>1642 based nepis and how based they are and how to quantify it still impossible - nepis are too based

>>1643 not really based to post a bunch of pics without context and take no part in conversation, so at least one nepi is just tepid like old faucet water

>>1575 I went out for awhile and it looks like I missed some nice additions to the conversation! >it *is* becoming harder to communicate I've noticed this. A lot of the time the people I interact with daily (not by choice) seem to have a great deal of difficulty understanding anything meaningful. Trying to have anything past small talk is a fucking headache, and sometimes they say lines I heard on the morning news waiting for the weather and traffic like it's their own opinion and it creeps me out. The NPC meme really fucking scares me sometimes, and so does DIT. But that's a bit of a ramble. I think it's an indication that a society falls apart without centralized authorities to sort-of "version control" what is going on with language and morality etc etc. It's at a point now where depending on where you go in the english speaking world you might as well be talking to someone who only speaks klingon. Relativism is a fucking destructive, insidious force. If cultural subversion had a form relativist philosophy would be it. I'm not an expert on history or sociology though so maybe I'm wrong or I'm missing something. >It's interesting to watch an anti People watching is one of my favorite things to do. There's all sorts of weird shit going on that people tend to ignore because it's mundane enough that it doesn't really stand out. Earlier today I saw a woman picking her nose with a pencil, and she was wearing a head-scarf with skulls that kinda looked like the SS nazi hat ones, but I'm not really sure. Antis are especially fascinating because they seem more restricted to their patterns than your average normalfag, to the point that they wont even realize they are contradicting themselves. I noticed a few days ago some /v/tards were using the exact same language we use concerning lolifags and BTFO'd antis, but to describe us. "In denial" etc etc. I doubt they even realize they borrow lines from what they consume rather than thinking up what to say on their own. Humans are fucking fascinating creatures, I wonder what alien zoologists would think of us. >There's no sense talking to people wo've never bothered to look for the truth and only believed what they've been told I don't understand why such a staggering number of people are like this. Even "redpilled" anons fall for anti-pedo kikery or fall into the non-pedo loli delusion. The human brain and mind is basically purpose built for pattern recognition. Before we invented most things you can think of, we had navigation. Lacking the senses animals use to find their way, we literally figured out how to use the stars to travel extreme distances without getting lost. When using mud to build stuff was a bleeding edge technology, we were pursuit predators that could track prey without running based on the fucking tiny traces they left on the ground, in the brush, for fucking MILES and DAYS through rain and darkness. Early man made the navajo look like boyscouts and most of that shit is still in there. So how the fuck do people not see obvious patterns and contradictions that are right in front of them? It's all in the data and it's not that hard. >>1576 >I value their autonomy By taking away their right to chose for themselves? To have control over their own bodies? Do you know that minors can't work full time for themselves, can't protect their own money because as dependents their parents can just take it from them, they can't even have bank accounts without a parent or guardian having joint ownership and unlimited access, they can't consent to anything medical (which doesn't just mean saying yes, but also 'no' and I learned that the hard way)? >their right to make their own choices, something they can't do at the point in which you decide to select them as your personal sex object why do antis always demhumanize children. You support theier autonomy but only when they turn 18 so you don't actually support their autonomy. They aren't objects, they are people, and that's something you need to get through your thick fucking skull. >a relationship that deviates from the norm is bad inherently guess how I know you are a normalfag, niGGer

>>1642 OwO is pedocock back on the menu?~ Have I been summoned to worship some lovely MAP members~ UwU I want to fill my tummy and my bussy with pedo seed desu!~

>>1644 buttravaged in the extreme

>>1645 I never said "I support their autonomy but only at 18", I'm not an anti that draws arbitrary lines based on nothing, theres just no valid argument against us so they have to draw arbitrary lines. But there are valid arguments against the baby fuckers. If you want to make the case for a 2 year old being capable of autonomy and decision making then by all means make it, I'd love for you to prove my lying eyes wrong when I look at a human thats barely out of infancy with hardly any control over its own body or mind and see it as being dependent on someone else to do everything for them in life. Maybe they're just playing dumb for me and all the autonomous genius babies capable of communicating their wants and desires hide their capacity from all but the people who want to fuck them.

>>1649 >I won't draw arbitrary lines unless it suits me then we need to draw an arbitrary line against totlovers because they made me butthurt on /b/ and I will never be able to get over it Babbies love pleasure the same as everyone else, you refuse to see it because you don't like babbies and are an autist. Post all of that butthurt shit you said on /pg/ about tot girls having their cunnies licked being as bad as genital mutilation and shit, you clown.

>feed baby >baby is happy >hold baby hand >baby smiles >all is well >lick baby cunny >OH MY GOD NO IT'S SO HORRIBLE POWER IMBALANCE SCARRED FOR LIFE his retarded opinions

>>1649 Quoting you at >>1576 "I value their autonomy and their right to make their own choices, something they can't do at the point in which you decide to select them as your personal sex object." By virtue of being a pedophile the "point" I would choose is below 18, and by legal definition anything below 18 would be pedo. Since you didn't specify the legal definition is assumed, and if you don't want to use this definition you need to specify which one you are using because I am not a fucking mind reader. What you said in this case means how I interpreted it assuming you are not playing semantic relativist games with your definitions. You are being dishonest and you know it, anti scum.

>>1652 he always is his only objective is to make nepis look bad and lie about us then try to contextualize his own attractions as being fine, ironically while calling nepis "crab bucket" because we want to argue for own interests while that's exactly what he does at our expense. He's also probably a manlet, which is damning.

>>1650 That's not fair, I'm an autist and I can't really tell what babies are thinking or feeling except for "what the fuck is this thing?", "that's extremely funny", or "I shit my pants/I am hungry/other problem and you need to fix that". But I know that even though I can't really tell what the fuck is going on because I can't understand non-verbal cues very well (and even non-verbal ones are hard sometimes) that babies have feelings and express themselves and are human beings and are also very cute. Not my AoA but very cute and I like to make them laugh (I have it down to a science with my baby cousin. The seperating thumb trick drives him fucking wild it's so much fun he brightens up the whole room).

>>1654 PS I forgot to add my main point of "don't lump me in with this hate filled smooth brain just because I didn't win the genetic lottery and have social problems"

>>1653 He argues like a jew and I don't like him. No brother wars, nepis are based and I love all my pedo brothers.

>>1650 Do you not know what arbitrary means? They arbitrarily set the age of consent because theres nothing that determines why a 17 year old isn't capable enough compared to an 18 year old or why a 16 year old isn't capable enough compared to a 17 year old etc. Where I draw the line isn't arbitrary because its at a point where human cognition truly breaks down to the level of animals, and being someone who values consent I can't morally justify doing something to someone without their consent. I compared it to genital mutilation because it basically amounts to the same thing, they either don't care that it happened or they feel violated for having it happen. There is no residual pleasure or pain to influence their feelings on the matter, only the fact that they had no choice in the matter. Why try and justify something like that in which you have to flip a coin to determine how the person will feel about what you did to them later down the line? >>1652 I wasn't talking about "you" as in pedos in general, I was referring to the baby fucker specifically.

>>1654 >>1655 Alan Watts said something about babies I always like which is that babies are the most recent incarnation of god. They are a joy to be around and I love them and I'm sorry for being a cunt and calling him an autist but he really does refuse to ascribe any individuality or agency to babies/tots and just acts like nepis are evil and don't love them just because they are sexually attracted to them which is a lie and it's the total opposite. There are bad sadistic people that don't love kids who do bad things like the NTR fag or Anna of CG but I personally hate them even more than this cunt, again out of love of the things sadistic kikes like them threaten. >>1656 He really does, he plays every kike game, he's disingenuous as fuck about everything and he spent the last deleted /pg/ thread being called out on it by more people than me or even by non-nepis. >>1657 But you dismiss their consent even when they are tots and know language well enough to say yes/no, in addition to dismissing non-verbal cues like happy expression/laughter/etc. that would occur if they liked it (which they would if it was the kind of conduct I argue should be okay, if they don't like it you should never do it in reality but stick to 2D or etc.) And again you only apply this to sex, babies and tots are consulted exactly as much with every other kind of play that they like and enjoy but you pretend it's different because of your antipedo sex-hating jewish worldview.

>>1658 It's ironic to call him disingenuous I won't say it's wrong, but it is ironic

>>1659 how?

>>1658 I know its different because your dad pressing the cow sound when you wanted to hear the chicken sound is a little less impactful than your dad sticking his dick in your mouth and cumming in it because when he tickled you and you laughed he took that as informed consent. You can talk about my "sex-hating jewish worldview" all you want but a society in which peoples babies are open for molestation and everyone treats it like no big deal has never existed so theres no reason to assume it would work out okay and none of the molested kids would see it as any different than having the cow sound pressed instead of the chicken sound. On the flipside societies in which I could have a child bride were the fucking norm until recently so I have definitive evidence of my interests not being harmful to society.

>>1657 >I wasn't talking about "you" What I said applies to every pedophile, you can't get around this with semantic games. Nobody here will ever fall for you ridiculous kikery. At least kikes are good at it, your words are literally right there for me to read and quote. You cannot get around that but you are pretending like we aren't capable of this. Like we don't have memories and a record of everything you say. >>1658 I'd argue as a matter of semantics that his treatment of children is more like a sociopath or a pyschopath. Being a functioning(ish) autist I can be a bit sensitive to misuse of the term and I apologize if I was overly sensitive in this case. Being in the same group at any level with an anti makes me very mad, is all, and on a lesser note I sorta dislike how "autist" is used as an insult sometimes. I try my best, y'know, and sometimes it can be frustrating. Babies really are fucking adorable as all hell. I think it's probably good that even ugly babies are lil cuties because otherwise I think it might be slightly harder to tolerate the constant screaming. It's hard for normal people, imagine what it does to the hyper-sensitive (talking about physical senses now) autist who gets sensory overload easily. But I mean with all that if I can still love a baby than I don't understand why everyone else can't too. >>1661 >sticking his dick in your mouth and cumming in it because when he tickled you and you laughed he took that as informed consent that's not at all what anbodys saying. first of all it's not anatomically possible to stick even a micro-seized adult penis in a baby, they are too small. second of all, the way you are representing consent here is way out of sync with what anybody else is talking about. you are not on the same page on this AT ALL and again you know this but you are doing it anyway. >you can talk about my "sex hating jewish worldview" all you want I was gonna do that without your permission but thanks I guess. Everything you said after this is sex-hating kikery bee tee dubs

>>1662 I asked for you to make the case for how a 2 year old is capable of autonomy and decision making and got no response so I'm not sure how I'm supposed to be "in sync" with whatever winks and nods baby fuckers interpret as the baby wanting sex from them.

>>1661 >forcibly orally raping the tot is the same as licking her cunny >I'm totally not a disingenuous clown >molestation, literally using antis poisoned language where any contact is by definition 'unwanted, unreciprocated' >anti is status quo so anti is right I'm not an anti >what I want is okay because I want it >>1662 Yeah he is literally a psychopath, I'm sorry man I have a literal autistic best friend tbh. I shouldn't have said it tbh, but I don't actually have anything against autistic people it's just it seemed like it because he won't ever acknowledge non-verbal cues including with stuff like horses - we had a big thing about it in the /pg/. He always takes everything into a vague abstraction where consent isn't real consent then paints you as a villain like above. Like I would do that thing he just said, which is a lie that pisses me off because I have no desire to harm a baby/tot. Frankly that's what's great about toddlercon because you can get unrealistic desires out with fantasy, but stuff like outercourse/cunny licks and kisses are totally not unrealistic nor the same and not harmful like premature fucking or forcible oral or any of that shit he always resorts to in his disingenuous lying. >>1663 In early tothood tots literally start to talk you know.

>>1664 You still have yet to define what "real consent" is because you know you'll sound like a sex pervert whos interpreting a babies mannerisms in whatever way he can to convince himself that the baby wants him to lick their vagina.

>>1665 why wouldn't they? babies have no hangups about pleasure they are little balls of hedonism and they are based as fuck

>>1663 If you did ask me that, I missed it and I apologize. Could you please quote the post in which you asked me to do this and I can remedy the situation right away. In fact I'll do it right now: they say "yes" or express that they feel good and want the good feeling to continue. If you don't think a tot can conceptualize this or express this clearly with the minimum understanding required, you've clearly never met one, because I have literally never seen a more explicit "no" from a person than when a tot threw a bowl of boiled vegetables across the fucking room because they tasted like shit. I wish I was that based at restaurants serving me fucking food poisoning with fancy sauce on top. It is INCREDIBLY easy to tell what a tot wants and whether they like something or not. If anything it's harder with adults because they are rulecucked by society to behave themselves and be passive aggressive. >>1664 It's all good, because I understand that you didn't mean to offend me and I really am a bit oversensitive about it. I appreciate you and your effort to make me feel good and your general niceness. I've never given much thought to the logistics of sexual tot stuff because my AoA is in the 7-9 range ideally, which I'd think is pretty different all things considered. I would assume that a nepi would think these things through though, and obviously wouldn't intentionally bring harm to the target of their affection and love.

>tfw never eating tot cunny and she pisses in your mouth because it feels good and she has no shame or reluctance to enjoy herself without limits despite the screaming fury of antis who hate happy tots and babies feels bad man also makes me hard to think about despite feeling bad tbh >>1667 tots deserve creamy white food they like not boiled veggies they hate >obviously wouldn't intentionally bring harm to the target f their affection and love based this this is what antis all fail to realize they say pedos want to hurt kids and nepis want to hurt kids no rapists and kikes and niggers want to hurt kids pedos and nepis love kids

>>1666 >>1667 The person that baby develops into will have hang ups and could end up with trauma from having their first memory be a sex act. If no development happened afterward I wouldn't even really care considering we do much worse to animals of similar cognition anyway, its the fact that you think you have the right to flip a coin in whether or not the baby will grow up to feel like they were raped later down the line.

I'm not gonna read almost any of this, I'm just gonna say my piece Babies can communicate distress Babies can communicate joy Babies can be completely passive about many things A baby can consent the same way a pet can, though they probably won't be as actively participating in the action. Make of it what you will, I'm not convincing anyone of anything, I'm just saying stuff.

>>1670 Agree with 100% of that but still think its a bad idea for the aforementioned reasons.

>>1669 >antis indoctrinate children to hate their lovers >it's the nepi's fault the same thing is applicable to older children you anti fuck >>1670 he lies about animals ability to consent too even with fully grown mares, like a 2 ton mountain of kick-you-once-in-the-head-and-you-fucking-die will just take shit it doesn't like, but horses will let you fuck them hard and push back on your cock because they actually want sex and don't give a shit, which is ~BASED~

>>1671 I don't see a problem with that position. Whether you think it's good or bad is really just your business once we've seen each others reasonings. >>1672 If they're the person I just replied to, they seem reasonable enough to me Mares are aggressively horny though, I don't know anyone that's had to work with them for a long period of time that didn't say so. None of them wanted to fuck the mares though. Zoophiles are weird, I wonder if we have any on this board. If so , I hope they hate furries.

>>1673 this guy insists mares aren't really consenting when they're crushing your pelvis up against the barn wall he is fully departed from being able to be reasoned with

>>1672 Its not the same thing as older children at all, like I said before theres been no society of free baby molesting with no hang ups about it in which the molested babies grew up unfazed. The argument of indoctrination works only for things like child brides because we can demonstrate they've worked just as well if not better in the past than marriages do today. You parrot these arguments with no understanding of the reasoning behind why they're being made. As for the animal fucker argument I'll make the same retort here as I did before, if you think a horse actually wants to fuck you then try fucking a wild horse and see what happens. The very first thing you do to a wild horse is break its will so it stops objecting to you doing things to it that it doesn't want done, I don't see the actions of a creature with a broken will of being of its own volition, the ox isn't pulling the cart because it wants to.

>>1673 I wonder if actual pedos here hate the lolifags... I just stumbled on here while drunk and now I know what fucking board I am on... oh gods...

>>1675 Furries say otherwise. And that's why they are just as stupid as lolifags for trying to mental gymenstrac their stupid porn. Oh gods... I shouldn't have drinked that tequila...

>>1676 I think its safe to say that lolifags are just as much "actual pedos" as we are, they're just less honest with themselves about it.

also I am a zoophile although only for horsies equiphile >>1675 >molesting there you go poisoning language again you anti I understand the arguments against antis indoctrinating children to hate sex just fine. Without antis everyone would have sex with kids just like they play with them without any differentiation if the kid enjoyed it, there's no reason it's not like that but anti death cults pretending it shouldn't be. >if you think a horse actually wants to fuck you then you have met mares in estrus

mares will fucking hump fence posts in heat lmfao

>>1675 >if you think a horse actually wants to fuck you then try fucking a wild horse and see what happen Form a friendship with it It won't be easy. Domestic animals are super different than wild, the process of making a trusting friendly relationship is massively more involved and difficult But in general, take an animal that sees you as kin or something similar and you can probably have a consenting sex partner. Whether that's good for them or not is a different discussion, and I don't have a vested interest in it. All that matters here is they'll go ahead and have at it. Mammals are horny like that. It's easier to accept this idea with males since their initiative is pretty apparent. Still, it's well known that mares want sex with their handlers. Not even a case of "they'll consent", they seek it. More than you can say about the average baby. Animals are weird. >>1676 Not really the same thing. Furries aren't fantasy zoophiles, they're a very different kind of scum. Add "furry" to any deviancy and they'll be a scummier version of that. Furry pedophiles doubtlessly do more harm to kids than their non-furry counterparts. Shun the furries.

>>1681 >Furry pedophiles doubtlessly do more harm to kids than their non-furry counterparts. Shun the furries. So those who make cub shit? What's the main difference between it and typical loli/shota? Both are of kids anon. Dosen't matter if one has animal features since they can be anthros for all I know. Both furfags, lolifags, and cubfags need to understand that they are all shit and into the same shit of irl. Gods... That really is a hard hit..

>>1679 It is molestation by definition, its only "poisoning language" when antis use it because we can determine with 100% certainty that the contact is wanted and reciprocated since the person has the control over their body to actually be autonomous and reciprocate and the control over their mind to decide what they want to do and communicate it. Statutory rape laws are the only thing that makes any sexual contact with someone under 18 molestation.

>>1682 The art is irrelevant, it's the mind of the furry They have a different brand of autism equipped, and it's a detriment to the well-being of anyone with less agency than them, like animals or children.

>>1683 Just because you're so disingenuous you lie about what's possible doesn't make molestation accurate. You're a joke.

also this takes advantage of the irrational antis unwillingness to see contrary evidence because if cp was legal your shit could be disproven right alongside them you only even argue due to the narrative framing antis have done you are an antipedo

>>1685 Theres no way to accurately determine what they want and they can hardly walk let alone reciprocate in a sex act so how isn't it accurate?

>>1669 see >>93 for why societal gaslighting is where feelings of abuse come from because I can't go to the effort of paraphrasing it for you, retard

>>1687 if you ignore any of the non-verbal and then in tothood verbal signals because it supports your argument to lie by omission

anti positions are literally indefensible and that's why they made proof to the contrary illegal

>>1686 I don't think any antis are around, you just brand baby debate as inherently anti It's just someone thinking differently. Work on ironing out the things you agree and really narrow down the most fundamental points that you don't agree on. Then, explore the reasons you both have, and maybe no one changes positions, but that's not really a bad thing.

>>1691 he uses anti talking points and anti narrative framing devices he's an anti

>1684 So all furfags are the same? Those who like anthro? gore? nechro? cub? rape? If so, I can agree on that anon! Oh gods... this fucking drink...

>be pedophile >love kids >do my best to make my beloved partner feel loved and happy >they say no so I stop and maybe do something else that they do like, or they say yes and I keep going with it because they clearly enjoy it >I am a monster >be anti >don't even view children as people, compare them to objects or animals constantly >do everything in my power to deprive children not just of pleasure, but of all autonomy they have over themselves until they are adults >completely ignore all evidence to the contrary and harm children under the facade of helping/saving them >I am a good person Someone explain this shit to me because I just don't understand.

>>1694 unbearable tbh

>>1688 I don't need the defenses for my interests co opted to serve the interests of baby fuckers even though the arguments make no sense in that context, thanks. >>1689 I don't ignore it, theres just no way to trust theres any accuracy behind it and any wiggle room can be used to just interpret the answer you want to get and that obviously can't fly because it defeats the whole point.

>>1689 >2 year old can literally distinguish it's likes and dislike, and express them with ease, as any parent can tell you with confidence >can verbally and physically express this and it is often excessively clear >but it's totally unreasonable that they can express anything about THIS ONE BUNDLE OF NERVES but everything else yeah they can do that BUT NOT WITH THE UNDERWEAR ZONE(S) >why? stop asking questions you sick freak, thats why boggles the mind

>>1696 assumes bad intent as always antipedo >baby fuckers language manipulation frames as bad actors >I don't ignore it a lie >can't trust there's accuracy behind the obvious emotions and desires of little people with zero guile who giggle and smile when happy and cry and yell when not happy (when antis are around) kill self anti >>1697 I hate having to waste my life pretending there's any validity to this, sucks being a normal unashamed person not buying into any dogmatic lies and being punished for it. Antis are the ones that deserve to suffer for being retards.

>>1697 PRAISE BE JESUS!!!

PRAISE BE JESUS!!!

>>1694 Many argue animals are people. There's a lot of compelling evidence they have a wide breadth of emotional complexity, and obviously feel pain and all the basic stuff. People that view animals as objects are usually pretty bad. I don't think it's negative to compare underdeveloped children to animals, nor unusual. Though, people do find it much more bad to compare, say, severely mentally handicapped people to animals. The reasons to do so are often similar, seems a little silly. >>1696 You said they can consent in the same way animals can. So, what is the problem? Try to keep it concise if you may.

>>1699 >>1701 based and redpilled the most anti kike thing you can do is worship the kikes and die for israel - average christfag

>>1697 Never said they're incapable of expressing anything, those expressions just have no bearing on whether or not that person will feel like they had a choice in the matter later down the line and I think we should respect peoples bodily autonomy when it comes to sex because not doing that is a dangerous and immoral slippery slope. >>1698 I can't just "trust" that they know what they're saying or asking for or the reasons why they should say no when they don't have even somewhat of a grasp on the language yet. >>1703 see: >>1669

>>1696 Give any evidence or rational reasoning for the cutoff point where it is okay in your mind. Say the age or barring that, the general cognitive abilities you consider to be bare minimum, and then back up why you think this with ANYTHING whatsoever. Literally link any one thing. >>1698 I just become hikki tbh but the lonliness can wear on me occasionally. I need physical affection or it just doesn't work. I've been thinking about patrolling likely-pedo areas to find a cute pedo bf for some legal affection. IDK how exclusives can manage, I wish I had a way to help all of you who suffer even more. >>1699 >>1701 Numbers 31:18 >>1703 I am in fact a lover of animals. I think nature is super cool but I also eat lots of juicy meat and that's fine because that's how nature made me. I'd prefer to hunt/trap my own meat though, I've heard rabbit stew is delicious. But most people don't see it that way and view nature/animals as lesser then the domain of man. From their perspective, treating children like animals is dehumanizing. They don't mean it in a nice way and that's sorta the point in this case. Based informed animal lover though.

>>1706 >grasp on the language except non-verbal consent is still a thing and babies are like an open book emotionally >>1707 I would love a pedo bf who understands me and my love of tots, would be a step up, but no tot gf is still a giant hole in my heart - even as this absolute cunt constantly lies about my intentions toward tot girls I just wish I could make a lot of tots happy and pleasure them. That is the real appeal for true nepis, not any of the shit he comes up with.

>>1706 >see >>1669 >ignored that the wall of facts BTFOs this because feelings of abuse come from societal gaslighting and inherent harm is a myth >never said (this shit again) anti you all say the same things. stop with the semantic games as though you havent been making a huge deal out of consent this whole time >>1705 lol imagine being so cucked you base all your political beliefs on a fucking numberline and define your entire ideology as stopping other ideologies from doing anything and then fail completely for literally a straight century.

>>1709 based and yeah fuck cuckservatives at least be a cool christfag like Joshua Graham (first step for any christfags reading: cover self in burning pitch and throw yourself into the grand canyon, if you live proceed to step 2) not gonna bother writing more steps though

>>1708 I don't really like labels but I would really like to have a friend, at least, I can talk to. I'm not a nepi myself, as I mentioned earlier, but I love all my pedo brothers and I won't hesitate to step up for them whenever I can. I wish I could do more than clown on retarded antis though, and make a real change. Maybe one day I'll figure out how to do that, or God will give me the opportunity and show me the way. I want desperately for physical affection, though the kind differs depending on if it's lgs or pedo adults. Really I guess it just boils down to wanting to feel/be loved, and wanting the oppurtunity to put more love into the world. I cry myself to sleep sometimes because it feels very cold being all alone. I worry maybe one day my daki will start talking back to me and I won't realize that it's abnormal.

I like how >>1699 >>1701 is spamming /v/ with this

>>1707 While I don't like drawing definitive cutoff points I think the point in which we stop finding cognitive deficiencies is where we can at least set a baseline which is at around 5, and its not just an arbitrary 5 years and 1 day means shes ready for the dick kind of line either. I think it should be taken on an individual basis, I just don't think anyone under that cutoff should even been considered when theres still demonstrable lapses in their cognitive abilities.

>>1712 sorry to hear I would love to be physically affectionate with a pedoboi tbh even if not a nepi although nepi would be even better for obvious reasons as I am a nepi but I like older girls too just not as much so as long as they aren't hating on me for being a nepi I'd still succ pedo bf pp

>>1706 I see. I think I understand your position. I don't have any counter-arguments, other than feeling the worry is rather nebulous. "it might be a problem" is how I interpret it. Still, you do you. Can you just shrug about the people on the other side of the argument and not be bothered they think what they do, or does it concern you even with hypothetical other children? >>1707 When I compare children and animals, I mean it in no disparaging way, it's just my perspective on their emotional expressiveness and limitations to communicate. You know there's depth there, and you know the limits.

>>1711 I'm a christfag, but I really hate how the bible is twisted by most church organizations. Especially in burgerland. Any idiot who reads the bible can see that catholic doctrine and puritanist beliefs and other such horseshit is completely out of line with what the bible teaches. Don't even get me started on the people who take it literally. The fucking book actually says it's all parable multiple times, it's divine word that it's not literal. The path to jesus is through the bible and personal journey, not through some fucking retarded church manipulating boomers into giving them money.

>>1714 Elaborate. What lapses in cognitive ability? What happens at 5 that makes creating a baseline before this age not worthy of consideration? Be specific, and link something for further reading.

>>1717 I'm a new age fag or something (idk what to call it) - all of my spiritually has roots in philosophy and fucktons of psychedelics. I can't ascribe to an external spirituality, only the shit I have a developed internal justification for believing or considering true. I puke at most interpretations of abrahamic religion because the cultures that spawned it are almost entirely at odds with me and my beliefs, goals, wholly alien.

>>1716 I think the reason you are missing why pedos are always so ready to BTFO antis is because the antis position is typically that we deserve death for existing and that we are monstrous subhuman garbage. Antis are fighting to take away pleasure, pedos are literally fighting for the right to be themselves and in some cases for their lives. I think that context is important.

>>1720 meanwhile nepis are doing the same and you act like an anti to them

>>1717 I bet you follow the feminist bible, how can you believe in a religion and not be a fanatic? If you just pick and choose, or use it as a "guide" like some hippy leftist, you obviously don't believe it. >>1719 >I puke at most interpretations of abrahamic religion because the cultures that spawned it are almost entirely at odds with me and my beliefs, goals, wholly alien. And what would those be?

>>1721 Is he? Are they?

>>1708 Is them having no grasp of the language at all supposed to be better? >>1716 >Can you just shrug about the people on the other side of the argument and not be bothered they think what they do Initially I did, but they've made us look so bad and having us lumped together with them has done so much damage to our image that I just can't ignore it anymore. They're just a dead fucking weight on top of any hope for us getting back what was taken. And they don't care because they never had anything to begin with, in fact keeping us down at their level guarantees they'll have company in their misery from now till kingdom come and I have no doubt they'll do it if we let them.

>>1721 I'm not an anti towards nepis though, I've been areguing against the divisive kike anti the whole time. I'm sorry if I was vague in my post or came off as him, I didn't mean to do that. >>1719 I can understand your position. People in power use anything they can to get what they want and that includes religion and the church. My view is that the core point is to accept jesus into your heart and just do your best to be a good person, as the bible outlines. You will fail, but it's less about succeeding and more about the genuine effort. I would say most vitriolic christians I meet do not do this. I just do my best to understand the good book and be a force of genuine good, and I feel like you don't need to be christian to accomplish that really. That's just how I do it. >>1722 I don't pick and choose. I just try my best to understand what it says and practice it but I'm not perfect. Since it's all parable, it can sometimes be difficult to understand the intent though, and I am certainly not perfect and I fail in many ways every day.

>>1722 My beliefs don't include an anthropomorphic concept of a deity, generally abrahamic fags are also ultra-sex hating and want to dictate what people do so that causes strife, I like Europeans and ethnic European culture absent slave morality and racial blindness equating everyone as being the same when they are objectively not. There's probably more stuff we are at odds on. >>1723 Yes, yes he is. They are, nepis want to worship tots and make them happy and pleasure them. He wants pleasure denied them and if he wasn't an impotent manlet and had actual power he's made it clear he'd want to act against nepis the same way antis act against pedos and nepis together. He's an asshole, and thankfully an impotent manlet that has no power. >>1724 >supposed to be better It's not better or worse, red herring. They can consent verbally when they are of age to learn to speak yes/no and understand (earlier than 5 by the way, way earlier) and also non-verbally communicate consent (to people that aren't weird one way mirrors like you and refuse to see it.) >entire anti-nepi rant and people say you aren't an anti lmfao powerless faggot

>>1718 Theres a myriad of cognitive tests done on kids under 5 that have a guaranteed wrong answer because of a lapse in cognitive abilities, like always pointing to a taller glass as having more water even if its volume is clearly smaller. After 5 theres no more tests like that so I think its safe to assume that as the baseline.

>>1724 They have a label to distinguish them from you, and if anyone brings up the matter, yu can tel lthem your stance If your major gripe is being associated with them, I think you're taking it the wrong way. Relax. At the very least, your methods of discourse aren't helping. A different tactic may be necessary, a way to rethink the problem.

>>1725 oh okay, sorry misdirect again (just like the PG thread I think? was that you lol?) he's a huge anti-nepi as he is saying here >>1724 >>1727 that's because they don't learn how things work earlier doesn't mean they can't they are still learning if you teach them how it works then they know your justifications are retarded

>>1715 I really just want to snuggle up under a weighted blanket and listen to your heartbeat. In a perfect world it would be me and you snuggled up, with our ideal aged wives snuggled up with us too, on a comfy bed/sofa with a nice blanket. All of us drifting off with a smile to the sound of quiet breathing and the rythmic beat of our hearts.

>>1730 based same though I also want to do gay shit with a pedoboi tbh but romantic lovey stuff sounds nice it's quite nice to just not have people spewing vitriol at you for existing so that alone is a plus

>>1726 >>absent slave morality and racial blindness equating everyone as being the same when they are objectively not. There's probably more stuff we are at odds on. So... white power forever anon? And fuck all other races? There can be a few who are decent out of say, the blacks or asians. Not saying whites haven't made good shit cause they have, but it's clear some people don't follow whatever bs there is. Just like the nones who don't follow Christfag religions or those who don't give a fuck about the church.

>>1732 I don't want to live near non-ethnic Europeans or at the very least East Asians, we have nothing in common and little compatibility. Go look and see how based niggers are in South Africa where they tie little beautiful white girls to tables and rape them to death in front of their fathers before killing them both by setting them on fire. If niggers are allowed to live another day it is a gift that they do not deserve.

>>1727 So 5 isnt entirely random/baseless, but can you explain to me why an understanding of how space works (in the case of the specific test you mentioned, which I happen to be passingly familiar with, dealing with volume represented in different visual ways) is required to be able to consent to something that feels good. I genuinely don't understand why you would need to do anything other than process the feeling and decide if you like it or not, and then express this feeling in order to consent? >>1729 That was me, perhaps it's fate. I don't really mind, I definitely understand the anger and I feel it too. My approach is to try to be positive but suppressing negativity is unhealthy and I am definitely having a hard time keeping my temper too. I'm sure this kind of mistake only really happens because of the lack of identity on a text-only platform of communication. >>1731 Oh yeah I absolutely want to do gay shit. Being non-exclusive (but only really for pedos in a practical sense) I only have any real preference for men as adults. It's kinda weird, I skip over everything past 13 into the 20s for adult pedo men, and 13 is my abolute cutoff for lgs. I would totally suck my pedobf's cock twice daily and literally just give him permission to grab me whenever he wants, carry me to the bed, and fill my bussy with MAP meat and pedo seed.

>>1728 Yeah, that label is anti because they've dug into our "movement" like a tick and think they're no different from us. And I have to sit here and listen to them co opting arguments that I formulated on my own and have been using in pedo debates for over a decade now as if the points are just as applicable to them as they are to me. If this site had more people on it I might be more concerned with ensuring my methods of discourse are "helping" but I'm honestly only concerned with signalling my absolute contempt for each and every one of them.

Also kikes are even worse because at least niggers are fucking retarded, kikes revel in cruelty intellectually and seek to undermine and destroy everything they encounter. >>1734 I like toddler girls and babies and preteen+ boys most tbh with men as pretty okay, I've had gay relationships before with non-pedos and it's been fun, would love a pedo bf to have fun with and suck off while he tells me about all of the stuff he wants to do with lgs/lbs or looks at loli etc. And ofc buttstuff, still tfw no pedoboibutt on face.

>>1735 Imagine thinking you are smart enough to even formulate an argument, you are the most disingenuous midwit rat I've met on 8moe and I've spoken to the fat kike on /v/ and Acidjew.

>>1726 I think the "anthropomorphic concepts" of biblical figures, or simply "characters" as I put it, are really just ways of explaining abstract phenomena. I think the devil is a fantastic example of this. There isn't a guy with red skin and a weird tail running around telling people to be evil and playing the fiddle, but there definitely is a phenomena by which moral corruption sprouts and then spreads itself like a cancer. It's not a literal devil, but something else (like human nature maybe) at work that causes things to go bad without vigilance and all that. The devil is just a way of explaining this, not a literal explanation of how it happens.

>>1733 I get that and that's fine for East Asians. Seems most Asians like Japan people just want to make business and don't make problems. If they like their shit like loli and they won't be causing trouble, I think everyone can live. Right, those blacks doing that shit are really fucking bad. I'm just stating that there are the few who are smart enough of understand to not act like bitches towards others if they hadn't been harmed or whatever and just to mind their own business. That's why I liked Malcom X. He tried to help make the blacks stronger, but he got killed because (((they))) needed a race to control so they don't have to do the dirty work.

>>1735 Both sides, regardless how they acted two threads ago when it began, have long since abandoned any kind of respect or serious intent to discuss the subject. If you continue it, all you do is make a less pleasant environment for the people that aren't your enemy. And you two have cultivated a tendency to label each other both antis, and anyone else that disagrees with you so. When you make everyone not precisely like you to be out-group, you do no favors for yourself. Relax. Neither of you are antis Just autistic.

>>1732 >absent slave morality and racial blindness equating everyone as being the same when they are objectively not. There's probably more stuff we are at odds on. >>THIS IS WHITE POWER AND WHITE SUPREMACY I love the logical leaps of lefties. wanting racial and cultural homogeneous societies don't make you "hate" others, or want to genocide other races

>>1737 I've never had the good fortune of finding a good partner in other men. I live near a major metropolitan area, so nearly every gay guy I have ever met has been extremely promiscuous, the whole stereotype thing. I'm not about that. Sex is a special act of love, and we shouldn't be negative about sex but we also shouldn't just give it to literally anybody. I'm just not in a good area to find homosexual or bisexual men who fit into the kind of relationship I want, so I remain a practical virgin in this regard. I ram my boihole to the thought of lgs though. Adult women disgust me and I feel like vomiting whenever one fucking touches me. I always take a very long shower to scrub it off at the first opportunity.

>>1734 I'm not trying to make the point that you have to have the cognitive abilities to understand volume in order to understand how to consent to sex, its just that any lapse in cognitive ability that can be tested like that is an indicator that shouldn't just be ignored and hand waved away. So waiting until a point in which those indicators of cognitive deficiency don't appear anymore before trusting the persons decision making is the moral thing to do in my eyes.

>>1742 Ah, my bad then. I just took that way since most anons usually say white power. I just am tired and am a bit drunk to.

>>1735 >hating nepis you are an anti and you are a source of negative energy >>1741 As a pedo, I would like to politely ask why I should respect people who want to stop me from expressing love, who view me as a subhuman monster who deserves death, and who argues like a lying kike. Like genuinely, why should I be nice to someone like that, even if they are only feeling that way towards a specific subgroup of my people?

>>1739 I realize that it's not all literal but it's also usually defined in ways that don't correlate with things I believe or my values, moral corruption is what? Some people will say it's rape and murder and for others its everything from smoking cigarettes to kissing your tot gf's anus at Wendy's. The last obviously is objectively moral, fight me. >>1740 The problem is regression to the mean, the smart ones have average children. I don't really necessarily think we should go around genociding everyone because there's room, but we shouldn't live together in most cases. And I certainly don't want to, nor do I feel kinship with out-groups, and I also prefer not to. >He tried to make the blacks stronger It's hilarious because Malcolm X was on some Wakanda we wuz kangz tier shit with the Nation of Islam then he went to the Middle East like once and came back all 'Holy fuck that is awful.' then they killed him. >>1741 >fencesitting same things both sides shit, adds nothing >>>/reddit/ >>1742 To be fair learning about South African violence toward little white angels makes me absolutely Moon Man snorting cocaine levels of genocidal energy. >>1743 Gays are pretty promiscuous. I used to live at a swinger campground for years and I've seen a lot of evidence of it. I am pickier though, pretty much only ever let randos service me (very good for the ego) but I was in a couple monogamous relationships with both sexes tbh, the grannies feel like more of a mistake in retrospect. It was worth a try but once I accepted I like lgs more I realized how fucking shit they are, I'm pretty much over grannies. >>1745 that's another anon btw lol >>1746 based

>>1741 I never had any respect for them to begin with but my serious intent to discuss it hasn't waned at all. The one babyfucker responsible for getting us kicked off /b/ might not have any serious intent to discuss the subject but all hes ever done is shitpost Also I never called any of them an anti. I bet they wish I'd call them an anti instead of a baby fucker though.

>>1744 I would disagree. Maybe there is some age that is just "too young", I wouldn't really know, but then there is also the possibility that there is no minimum age and humans are born with the minimum necessary cognition to consent non-verbally. I'm not an expert, but neither are you. I think that in order to consent all a person needs to be able to do is >identify what does and does not feel good or what they do/do not want >express the above clearly and I have met many toddlers who fit these requirements with ease.

>>1748 Lmao oh now it's my fault this site is rulecucked, nice. Glad the sfw totpics butthurted you so much, we need smolbox so I can drive you over the edge. Anti.

>>1746 Mutual apathy. If you two like flinging negativity at each other, then keep it in this thread and have at it. It's fairly contained so it's not that bad I guess. One perk of this being its own board instead of one single pedo general thread I suppose. But that doesn't sound very worthwhile. Neither side will gain or lose anything, besides equal amounts of time. The way you talk to each other inherently will not sway anybody. >>1748 If you want, I can try talking about it with you. I don't have much to say though since I'm not invested in it. I doubt my views will interest you. But I'll participate if you want me to. My only condition is we relax

>>1747 Right, I agree that if there are most people who want to be alone from other races, then let them. If said races want to do bussiness, then there should be nothing wrong like how loli artists provide their fictional smut for money. A win-win for everyone. And if there are those who want to racemix then so be it, just don't bother with them and treat them as outcasts. >Malcom X I didn't know that. Wow... seems like I thought it was the kikes, but it was the Muslims who have a fucking 9 year old in their bible be married and yet, said people who are worried about stuff like loli don't talk about it because of PoC bullshit.

>>1747 >another anon Ah, okay. Thanks for saying that. I didn't realize he was a different one.

>>1747 I suppose what is moral is what is written in the bible as good or conversely, avoiding what is written as explicitly bad. I'm not an expert and I won't pretend to be, all I can do is my best, and I don't think it would be right of me to try to force or otherwise look down on people who don't share my faith. I can respect anybody with strong convictions, in a general sense, and you sound like you have those. I had a couple of grannies and one of them tried to murder me with a kitchen knife, and the other one took advantage of my autism to lure me into her bedroom and attach me to the bedpost. What followed wasn't pleasant for me. I have had a lot of bad experiences with grannies, save a select few who I don't really look at sexually, and their generally fucked up and shitty behavior makes me really dislike them. It's kinda personal, so I can't be an objective voice.

>>1751 >Realx Over a cup or tea or coffee?

>>1750 You kicked the hornets nest with no concern for who it would effect outside of you, yes its your fault. Thanks for admitting to it though, an admission like that from you really helps my point that you faggots will undermine us as any given opportunity to stop us from getting back on our feet and leaving you alone. >>1751 Well my condition is not being tone policed or else I would choose reddit or 4chan to have discussions not a nearly dead underwater basketweaving forum.

>>1751 Nobody will ever be convinced on the internet. It's a futile struggle. But there is honor in battle, and bereft of the opportunity to go crusading across the country to accelerate into collapse with a shotgun full of homemade HEAP and a sexy lg to fix society, I must instead make my stand here on this Lithuanian throat massage forum. Death before dishonor, nigger, at least I stand for something.

>>1752 I mean it could have been the kikes, but he did do that, and he kind of fell out with Elijah Mohammad over it. Considering George Lincoln Rockwell also got similarly assassinated around the same time by a kike infiltrating his movement, it does echo. Based and separatist pilled. >>1753 Yeah np. >>1754 But why is it moral because it's in the bible? I view morality strictly as a cause-effect equation weighing harm vs. benefit (if there is harm, or if there is benefit) for me vs. the others who are involved and whether or not there is consent/knowledge of harm and risk/value throughout the system. Sorry to hear about your bad experiences, mine weren't that bad, they just weren't very satisfying. I had more fun with the guys I was with, lot less expectations and more lewding. >>1756 I didn't kick a hornet's nest. I kicked a nest of sweat bees who can't sting me because they're really small and weak and stupid. It's good that you're this asshurt at me though, let it fester forever and remember that your ass is property of based AJ the jannyslayer.

>>1755 yes I have some black tea with cinnamon and a bit of milk Nice and hot >>1757 I stand for free speech

>>1758 >why is it moral because it's in the bible? This isn't an easy question to answer. For me, it serves as something to look towards when I don't know what the right thing to do is. It serves as an authority to me for harder questions that I can't answer on my own. But that's a fancy way of saying that it's moral because I decided it is, and I don't want to come off that way. I guess it's more personal too, there is an element of that too. It's not a moral code that I would force on anybody else, and I don't really have any proof that it is what is actually right either. At the end of the day it's faith. Faith in jesus, faith in the bible, faith that it's good and that jesus loves me. It sounds silly, but it got me through stuff I don't want to talk about, and so I do my best with it. This feels kinda incoherent but I'm hoping you understand what I am trying to say. As for my bad granny experiences, I have been told by a freind of mine in psychology that a possible explanation is that I attract bad people. I am an autist and I am generally vunerable because of plenty of bad things that have happened (I was bullied a lot for being weird, also because I am an autist), so people who are looking to take advantage of people will be naturally drawn to me. It's a vicious cycle, because I want to be loved and so I am very trusting and easy to manipulate, and then it goes bad and im back to the beginning again. This has caused me to develop some issues with trust, and I've been a little scared to try to meet someone and be friends with them or something more. It hurts, I want it to stop, I don't know how. >>1759 Free speech doesn't mean intelligent speech, antis are universally hateful, unintelligent, and also big mean stupid lying buttheads.

>>1749 I think you value the importance of consent across human history too highly if you think its ingrained into us from birth. Before language and societal development whether or not your club is big enough to knock a woman out when you hit her on the head with it was the decider for if she gets dragged back to the cave. I'd go as far as to say our abilities for language and consent aren't ingrained into us at all and its all nuture from the society that teaches it.

>>1760 I don't place any stock in faith, but as long as you aren't one of the guys trying to force me to live by faith-based idiosyncratic standards and beliefs I disagree with or want me to convert then I don't care. >generally vulnerable That is a target on one's back with some shitters. >>1761 I think you're an anti bordering on a feminist cultist lmfao.

>>1760 I use my free speech to take a shot for some relaxed conversation this time. No trouble wandering back to the discussion thread if it doesn't pan out~ >>1761 >I think you value the importance of consent too highly this is funny without context

>tfw still want cute chubby tod gf even though it makes that one guy furiously asshurt based based of me af

>>1762 Yeah, I don't like it when people try to force their beliefs on me either, so I don't do it. I'm sure if we got to talking without the labels we'd probably find we see eye to eye on most things concerning the spiritual, at least. As far as morality goes we could probably agree on some fundamentals like "don't hurt people unless you have no choice" and "try to help people in need when you can manage it" and even "don't steal from people". the operative word in that last point is "people" because I see it as a moral impertative to fuck over banks and corporations at every possible opportunity. This means credit card fraud is fine as long as it only hurts a giant financial institution and not an actual person. As far as being vunerable goes, the best I can say is that only women and the odd male teenager trying to impress girls went after me. If anything is the devil, it's sexually developed women. >>1763 This is where all the action is though. Changing the subject can help if you wanna deescalate. How about we talk about what we want in life. I've already gone on about my affection woes and some vaugeries about my experience with grannies, why not contribute there and move the conversation that way? I'd be happy to share more if people wanted to know, or hear more about others too if they want to share.

I want to talk about tots.

>>1766 I want you to describe, in excruciating detail, everything you like about tots. Literally just fucking write a wall of text about every single minute aspect of tots you enjoy.

>>1765 Ignoring it and talking about whatever I want, or just coming back when there's some other topic at hand, is normally what i"d do But sometimes, ya gotta see if reason and calm talking might ease tension. They'll return to the subject eventually, maybe my words will mean at least one side chooses not to bother. Or not. >what we want in life I want a castle and a garden and lots of sunshine. I look forward to marriage. We haven't set a date yet, it's a ways off, but I'm definitely sticking with this. My future mom in law is already basically my mom. She's great. I guess I'd also like boundless wealth, but that's not realistic. A caslte is though. I'm getting a castle.

>>1767 >cute and smol >loving unconditionally >indulgent without reservations or shame >totally honest and guileless >fresh perspective makes experiences new and exciting and it is a joy to watch them learn things and discover >chubby soft features, fat lil cunnies, tummies and butts >cute voices and cute babytalk about their cute tot opinions >wear cute lil tot clothes and toddle about exploring, toddling literally being the cutest way to describe tot movement >incredible little unrestrained imaginations that don't let anything being impossible get in the way >big soulful eyes as a window into their happy little worlds >infinite potential >cute little feet and hands, highly holdable >cute haircuts that emphasize their big round cute heads >like all things good in the world, bright pastel colors and cute animals >none of the negative aspects of aging, bodies unmarred and also natural - devoid of any tattoos or other ugly shit that grannies get >love to have fun and try things, don't mind just existing either, not in a rush and enjoy their lives for what they are so many things they are perfect and I want to marry one and then be smothered to death by her cunny

also they make antis the most butthurt out of anything ever including that one guy jannies have a fucking aneurysm when they see cute tots too

>>1768 How much do castles cost? I imagine it's more expensive than a regular house, and probably isn't cheap to maintain. Will you also have serfs to till your land? Will I have to call you royal highness when you buy the castle? Also, are you the person who wasn't a pedo but was marrying a pedo? I'm getting very tired and will likely fall asleep before we can continue, but if you are that person I want to know all about >how you found out about the pedo thing >how you first reacted >what you do to fufill love interest's pedo desires, if anything at all >how far into acting on the pedo thing would you be okay with lots and lots of details, without revealing your identity obviously.

>>1769 >>1770 Extremly based (on tots). I'm glad you shared! I can tell you really like tots.

>>1772 I like talking about tots, they are also based.

>>1342 >It's in progress, What, the new site?

>>1771 Castles are cheaper than a shit-shack in NYC or LA. Still expensive though, lots of land necessary. Highness sounds lame, I'd want no title unless it's going to be excessive and dramatic sounding. >are you the person who wasn't a pedo but was marrying a pedo? yeah >how'd you find out the pedo thing Discussions of books, comics, and anime. It was a long process, but in short lolicon lead to it. >first reaction "ha, well I'm not leaving you alone with any kids" and continuing conversation. Not the first pedo I've known. I'm desensitized. >fulfilling pedo desires Teasing about what I may or may not be doing when I babysit >how far into acting on the pedo thing would you be okay with I guess just teasing them while they get no action. I personally feel entirely indifferent about CP, loli, and so on, if they have safe means of getting in then they can enjoy as much of it as they want. They wanted very much for me to watch some with them too. If I did such a thing, theoretically, my reaction would have been attention, teasing them, and resisting getting a bit bored, and afterward discussing the lack of production value and we talked about the history of legality and what gets produced and so on.

>>1799 you seem nice. What about "the magnanimous and beautiful/handsome count anon the magnificent" as a title, is that dramatic enough?

>>1802 >you seem nice I'm a shitposter through and through tbd >dramatic enough? "The Magnificent" will always remind me of the ottomon ruler Suleiman the Magnificent, and despite their prestige, they're still muslim, so no thanks I'd want something really edgy, and with religious undertones if possible. It adds to the dramatic flair. Tell me about yourself too

>>1803 I was actually thinking of Suleiman too. Sorta lame most people just roll with "the great". I'm not dating or marrying anyone really, and I've sorta already touched on some of my life experiences so far. I don't really know where to start aside from that I have a lot of difficulty getting along with people, especially my family. I think it's the winning combination of serious convictions, unabated autism, and the disparity in intelligence between me and most of the people I interact with. Please don't interpret that as boastful though, I don't consider myself to be particularly intelligent or quick on my feet it's just that these people are actually braindead and it drives me insane. I do my best to stay positive but it's not always so easy. I'm working towards breaking away and going to live on my own soon, which due to various reasons wasn't possible before, and I think when I do I'll be much happier than I am now.

>>1757 >Nobody will ever be convinced on the internet. It's a futile struggle. I think most modern pedos were 'convinced' by the internet, or rather the content posted on it that they couldn't deny, it's just a question of what their eyes alight upon.

>>1805 With my very low int, I get along with lots of people, and effortlessly remain positive. As long as you know a little bit about a lot of things, you have something to talk about with anyone. I wish you the best of luck on your endeavors.

>>1808 You too, pedoloveranon

>>1808 for some reason retarded nice people are the people I get along with best irl, I... appreciate it

>>1681 Sage

>>2287 Inner-peace, non-judgemental, and a memory that can't possibly hold onto bad impressions after a couple hours. I'll happily be your friend because I can't remember any reason not to be

>>2588 dubs of do excellent by each other

>>1388 >because they bend to the Russian government's tantrums over lolicon and similar shit. But Russia host the most amount of sfw underage model online that is not in deepweb. I got conflicting information >>1337 Anyone who spam cuck are proud boys who escape from 4chan and find out that free speech also apply to things they don't like

>>2620 >Anyone who spam cuck are proud boys who escape from 4chan and find out that free speech also apply to things they don't like I might agree but I lack the reading comprehension to be sure

>>2620 >because they bend to the Russian government's tantrums over lolicon and similar shit. But Russia host the most amount of sfw underage model online that is not in deepweb. I got conflicting information Lolicon is CP which is illegal. Russia sees them both as the same thing. Underage models who are not nude are not illegal (anywhere).

>>2629 CONTEXT MATTERS ANON. IF A PEDO POSTS ANY PICTURES OF CHILDREN THAT'S ILLEGAL!!!!1!

>>2630 children are based

>>2632 based on what?

>>2633 being based and basedpilled

>>2634 I thought it was that they were based on my cock

>>2635 that's tots

>>2636 Oh shit you're right

>>2637 never settle for protogrannies

just make this shitty site TOR only and give me my pedoboards back antis need to fucking die

>>1344 Kek i was in that thread on coronachan. Few days before chijo threw a fit and deleted the board haha

>>5264 >the trannychan users are the ones on board with the BO and his decision to make his site just like theirs It all makes sense now, you're just going to use him and piggyback off his site instead of having to maintain your own aren't you?

>>5299 >butthurt spineless coward continues to cry

>>5301 Hey it won't be me that finds themselves on a site full of circlejerking trannies when they wanted to make a site for pedos, its no skin off my back.

>>1507 >>1509 /gif/ is their interracial board.

>>5304 Don't worry, I'll stay here with you.

Reminder that /hebe/ will always remain, no matter what, to serve as a bunker.

>>8064 >>8065 yes?

>>8067 >>8067

>>10312 what's your angle

I miss childsplay

>>10394 How are you not in jail?

>>2629 >Underage models who are not nude are not illegal (anywhere). Times have changed https://www.vice.com/en/article/z3x5bj/photos-of-women-are-being-erased-in-kabul-as-taliban-seize-power-in-afghanistan

>>1694 No one sees children as "objects" or "animals", they just acknowledge that children are not fully grown and thus can not make certain decisions. If they were literally just adults in little bodies, they could get a "smart person job" and buy shit. You fucking people are comparable to Scientologists, do you honestly think children are capable of making their own decisions? No one is abusing children except you. You fucking Jew, flipping shit and Tryna be a smart guy. You do not like children, you just have a fetish for underage bodies, otherwise you would be content with just having a relationship. You fucking animal jew cunt.

>>11024 >If they were smart they could get jobs If wagies were smart they wouldn't have to work.

>>1617 So much pseudo-intellectualism here. Painting is of Cupid. Cupid, although not technically boy cuz he’s a god, was nevertheless a male god