>>2355 >teenager assuming you are talking about over 14 then yeah those are sexually mature adults. That's not pedo unless you are talking to an insane anti. 14 is the maximum value for hebe iirc.

>>2355 Same, mostly, though there are a few prepubescents who definitely catch my eye. For the younger girls it's usually the cuteness that gets me more than sexuality. But I think most straight men like teenage girls regardless of "legal age." So I'd agree that you might not be a pedo if you definitely have no attraction to kids.

too old

>>2355 Also, OP, I don't know why you choose the Devil's Dog for your post. They are not cute like the lolis and completely evil creatures.

>>2370 >the devil's dog >hangs out with angels real 1s no what i mean

>>2357 >That's not pedo unless you are talking to an insane anti You mean the average american?

>>2474 There was this Youtuber who was sexting a 17 year oId but if you only saw the reaction Twitter had you'd assume he sexted a 7 year oId.

>>2476 Would have been a lot more respectable.

He was 19 too, which was fucking stupid.

>>2479 At least some third party spastic retard got to virtue signal, about weird busybody opinions they were told to have and lack any personally conceived rational justifications for. In their efforts to protect pubescent children, who are by definition not children, from being molested by other children (that aren't children) - the non-children involved are an acceptable sacrifice for the amount of retweets and likes the uninvolved third party likely received. Plus all of the venting all of the equally disgusted randos in the comments got to do, it's an exercise in therapy making sure the herd has a chance to focus their anger at the system somewhere unproductive and also show the value of unquestioning conformity to observers.

>>2355 LMAO, what a faggot.

>I like teen girls. >im not a pedo. Anything below 30 is pedo, you know that. Now apologize to society for being a monster.

>>2355 Yes That is why it's called hebephile and not pedophile. Then again why not just be both?

No.

>>2474 These days average rest of the world counts too. God I hate mutts and their stupid values being the considered the moral default.

>>4552 death to america

>>4552 God I hate muttniggers https://indiachan.com/pol/res/239996.html#240000

>>4948 >file not found What did it say?

>>5020 nothing

I love young preteen prepubescent 11 year old underage loli CUNNY!

>>5020 Some thread of antis seething against underaged bikini models.

>>5719 NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO IF YOU ARE UNDER 30 YOU AREN'T ALLOWED TO SHOW ANY SKIN WEAR A BURKA NOWWWWWW REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>5720 inshallah

sad!

Anything below 10 is disgustingly pedo for me. 10+ is ok though.

>>6466 When you think about it a little bit is ok under 10. it's not necessarily a big thing to go to 6-8

>>5720 Mudslimes are propedo tho

>>2357 you don't define what the line is.

>>6469 the muslim scripture says it was during those times when it was socially acceptable 1400 years ago.

>>2357 I'd define it whenever a woman's first menstrual cycle begins. That means it is variable. With the plastics and birth control in the water supplies these days some girls are budding B cups and having their periods at 9 and 10. Age of consent should be AFTER a woman's first menstrual cycle and of course if she is a willing participant.

>>7004 >age of consent should exist false

>>7005 for penetrative sex, yes. for anything else, no.

>>7006 penetrative sex should happen when a person is physically capable of having penetrative sex and consents to doing so. When girls get their periods that means they can have children, and it doesn't mean that they have to wait until that point to do some baby-making.

Normalfag

>>7006 Why? If your dick will fit and she wants it, what more besides marriage should be required?

>>6466 below 10 is ok for light sex play, such as a licke or cock rub.

>>7026 and hardcore buttfucking

when they are not in the clock they are ready for the cock

>>7026 based

>>7026 is it possible to fuck <10 without hurting them?

>>7396 With a lot of patience, or a small penis.

>>7396 Yes it is, but usually you have to do penetration training first. As long as you do everything correctly it's even possible to penetrate girls as young 4 or 5 comfortably, safely, and mutually pleasurably.

>>7399 lmao where tf did you get that info?

Get

>>7776 The pedophiles handbook. Found at any respectable cp index.

>>7778 You can't prove it officer

>>7779 Removed of pictures I wonder if it could be legally posted.

>>7782 TPH doesn't actually have any illegal pictures in it. Pictures of children? Yes, ripped off of facebook, but it was specifically made so that even if found on a hard drive it is not illegal to have. Having something called "The Pedophile Handbook" that details the exact methods you used to commit a crime probably would still be relevant evidence though, but the literature itself is not actually a crime. Kinda like owning the plans to build an illegal weapon or instructions on committing burglary. At most, it's intent, but they can't really get you on just that.

>>7784 I get a lot of questions here that it answers. We should upload the pdf then.

>>7785 We would probably still get in trouble with blacked.moe retards thinking mentioning children is against federal law

>>7786 Sadly probably true.

>>7787 You probably post it on smolbox, but even then you'd probably have to change the filename to something like "Required Reading" and be coy about what you've actually posted. The admin probably has a copy himself but he's pretty autistic about being able to "sell stuff as not CP". In fairness online service providers are probably just as retarded as blackedmoe admins but it's still annoying.

so

>>2355 Is that the only age bracket?