just go back to kikeygarden

So what is hurtcore exactly? Is it just any porn with crying? I've never seen it as a tag on mainstream stuff like gelbooru or pixiv.

>>3765 Anything with an unwilling participant; not necessarily with crying, though a lot of that crap does have crying in it.

Fine, I'll say it. I really want to make kids smile. I know I'm a monster, I just don't care.

>>3765 What Anna of CG masturbates to, also Joshua Connor Moon. >>3767 Based. Kill all kikes that don't.

>>3766 Why isn't it just called "rape" then?

>>3769 Because rape is not the only category of hurtcore.

go away kikes

>>3770 What category of hurtcore isn't rape?

>>3772 Blackmail/coercion is probably the most common form of hurtcore. It doesn't require there to be more than two parties (IE no rapist). Forcing a girl to strip/masturbate on camera, for example, is hurtcore (even if the person forcing them is not in the room, etc). Something like Ruben's girls.

>>3773 I think most people would still call those rape, but I think I sort of get the distinction in this context. >Ruben's girls What's that?

>>3772 Even something as simple as a parent filming themselves spanking their kids bare ass raw is hurtcore even if theres nothing inherently sexual about the act itself.

>>3775 Ruben was a fairly popular blackmailer who had a list of girls he would force to do things on Skype with him (sexual, and, often, painful things). He was hiding in Mexico but eventually one of "his" girls (Angelena?) figured out who he was with the help of police and he was extradited to America and put in prison.

>>3777 "Popular" because he released the Skype videos, that is. Not popular for a good reason.

>>3776 Yeah that makes sense. Though, if they're uploading it for pedos, isn't it sexual? Or do people find spanking videos that aren't meant to be shown to pedos and they spread it? Kind of like people posting photos of kids on nudist beaches

>>3779 People into that sort of thing enjoy seeing vulnerable beings suffer, it probably doesn't have much to do with pedophilia

>>3780 It's a symptom of cursed kike blood go away kikes

also kikes aren't people

>>3780 >enjoy seeing vulnerable beings suffer Is there a lot of overlap with hurtcore fans and yukkuri abuse?

>>3779 Probably a bit of both, the only one I ever saw a thumbnail set for seemed to be framed in such a way that the filmer knew it would be viewed in a sexual light. Its really not my thing though so I haven't seen many examples since I don't seek it out. I will admit I have a guilty pleasure for doujins featuring blackmail though but it doesn't really translate to real life since I wouldn't want a real human bean be subjected to that and usually the doujins follow hentai logic where the blackmailer and the loli live happily ever after in the end and it was just that she needed a little "convincing" first.

/v/ is the jew board

This is also probably the thread to talk about NTR, if anyone wants to bring it up again

>>3790 kill self kike

stop being kikes

I enjoy supporting small communities even if I don't necessarily agree with everything they have to say because the payoff is always worth the effort of being excellent. Can't wait for your next site!

>>3793 Take your meds.

>>3793 We're here to stay.

:^)

>>3796 How r u?

>>3797 I'm doing okay, how is u?

>>3798 Doing good, thank u. Have you made progress on the site project?

Don't know if you care but editing what other people have said is a pretty big faux pas, but I guess if it were to happen in any thread this would be the most fitting one. :^)

>>3799 I'm currently learning about nginx. I'd say I've made some decent progress. On my to-do list today is some unrelated studying, looking into making my own reverse proxy with nginx (which so far seems manageable, cheaper, and with the added benefit of not getting deplatformed by the reverse proxy). I'm also weighing between whether I should go with vichan or with lynxchan. I'll also be investigating and sending out emails to a few more providers today later on.

>>3800 Nothing wrong with editing unwholesome posts into wholesome ones, never was.

>>3802 As a free speech absolutist I couldn't disagree more, that same mentality is what caused /hebe/ to be nuked on 8chan to begin with. ! The accuracy of this statement is disputed

>>3801 Isn't vichan pretty outdated? I honestly don't know. There's also jschan, maybe you want to look into that too.

Jim was a free speech for me but not for thee hypocrite and thats why he felt justified in ousting pedos from the site entirely and not even allowing them to speak, don't see how you could dispute this. ! The relevance of this post is disputed

granny, opinion of people disregarding the moral arguments entirely and not caring if pedophilia is wrong?

>>3805 This is a site for free speech. The board itself isn't.

>>3807 Well I think thats a terrible and hypocritical decision just as /pol/ coming to a free platform like 8chan just to set up their censorious hugbox was.

>>3808 See rule 1 of this board. This isn't the /pol/ board and it definitely isn't a circle jerk either.

>>3808 Why take /pol/ as an example when there is also /v/?

stop being hurtcore kikes and start loving tots gently and respectfully or else

>>3804 Yeah but I would prefer something very simple. On the github they say the only active development is security updates. Looks like the latest activity was in march of this year. >>3806 Pedophilia isn't wrong. How could love be amoral? I think if you are looking at pedophilia and saying that you don't care that it is wrong, than you have misunderstood something fundamental. Supporters are supporters are supporters, though, so I won't be too picky. I certainly wouldn't be hostile to someone willing to see pedos as people and not monsters! >>3807 >>3808 >>3809 This board is for pedos to chat, but I also like frozen peaches so we have that here too. Anybody can say or post anything inside the confines of the rules. I don't edit away posts that disagree with me, I only touch them if they don't really have anything substantative to say. For example, making idle threats or low-effort insults, or whining about having your post edited. >>3811 Hurtcore will never be allowed. I hate people who hurt children more than I like frozen peaches. I will not give people who intentionally bring harm to children a platform. There are certain things I will not abide. I am not, as another poster has put it, a "purist". I am absolutely willing to allow almost anything, though.

>>3810 Because /pol/ is the most censorious hugbox that comes to mind making it the best example, while I agree with you about /v/ its still debatable amongst some people.

>>3812 I don't like the idea of an arbiter of substantive posts who decides if what I say is worth being heard.

>>3812 I love you based BO, you are my secret husbando no one must know about and no matter how closely you guard your nudes, I will spend millions tracking you down and abducting you in accordance with your will (if you will have me) and take you to my secret tot fortress on Chubby Tot Island or something name TBD (tbh)

>>3813 But in the context of this site it's definitely /v/ tbh. Those jannies are insane.

Especially Kazoo, he's the worst.

>>3812 >I will not give people who intentionally bring harm to children a platform is this thread going to be deleted?

>>3819 should be edited to be about doing wholesome stuff and being moral aka. loving children and always naming the jew

>>3812 >I would prefer something very simple I've never set any of them up but considering how many instances of lynxchan and jschan there are it shouldn't be that hard. In terms of functionality and spam mitigation it could pay off to use something more recent.

>>3812 Could you increase the thread limit? Currently it's too low.

I am so happy to know hurtcore kike cunts won't be allowed on based smolbox because they are worse than the most retarded anti and I disavow their existence and wish they would all go die.

>>3819 Good question. No. Let me be explicitly clear on where I draw the line: Things I will tolerate Talking about hurtcore, or topics related to hurtcore (like above, for example) Expressing any views on hurtcore a poster may have, including those that differ from my own Things I will not tolerate Posting hurtcore, at all, for any reason Linking directly to hurtcore media Giving any kind of actionable instructions on how to bring harm, mental or physical, to a child The line is liable to move as I gain experience being an admin. If it does, I will be sure to make it clear where I stand. >>3814 :^) >>3821 This is true, something I'll consider for sure. >>3820 I wouldn't edit an entire thread like that, I don't think I could and also preserve the readability of a discusssion

>>3824 you shouldn't let them defend it that shit is fucked what are your thoughts on >>3815 pls respond I am so happy you aren't one of these people although I already knew it tbh

you can help name the island if you want it's strictly tbd tbh we could call it chubby tot to 7 is peak island

>>3827 >post ends in 7 peak digits

My heart goes out to all hurtcore nazis, please feel excellent and be invited to join conversation

>>3829 ntr kike go die

>>3822 I've doubled it, be sure to let me know if it needs to be increased again >>3826 I personally don't think they have a defense for it. In rational terms I think if you are willing to harm a child something is probably wrong with you. One of the core parts of living, as far as nature is concerned, is having offspring and protecting them. If you lack that instinct, or it's very weak, I think something isn't quite right. As for >>3815 , this poster is very excellent and I wanna snuggle with them x3

>>3831 based ty same not having empathy or being sadistic are both characteristic of the worst subhumans aka. negroes, chinks and kikes pure garbage kids its even worse because they are also cowards preying on the weak and vulnerable

plus most of the posters are just doing it to be edgy or to make pedos look bad (antis false flagging) it's absurd to associate a term that means childlover with fucking rapist kikes that want to torture/rape/murder children but they love to help antis have these conceptions to protect themselves hiding among us fucking kikes

>>3831 Just make it 300 or something, there's no reason to keep it that low.

>>3829 >>3835 >we 2dfags are not pedos because we hate children Best argument they came up with so far.

>>3832 Exactly. If they want to be wrong and stupid I will allow them to be wrong and stupid, for the same reasons I allow antis to do so. Censorship is not necessary because in an environment of frozen peaches, the best ideas prevail in a sort of natural selection. Naturally, their idea is shit, so it withers and dies when faced with any competing ideas. This is already at work here. You can see it if you look. >>3833 Probably true, but banning something never works in the first place. It's much better to have discussion that can be routinely disavowed if it's a question of optics. But really it comes down to frozen peaches being for everybody, not just the people who agree with me.

>>3836 It obviously applies only to a small fraction Like kazoo the jew

>>3835 kill yourself kike you are subhuman garbage and don't even deserve an unmarked hole because you'll kill the plants unfortunate enough to grow over your rotten jew corpse

elon should tie hurtcorekikes to space-x rockets and shoot them into the sun tbh

>>3839 easily triggered manlet, as usual

>>3841 >t. has to pick on lgs because he is 4 feet even and can't even overpower a roastie

>>3832 >implying theres anything inherently wrong with having a sadistic streak Being a sociopath with a total lack of empathy is the destructive part. I've got a bit of a sadistic streak that manifests itself in an exhibitionist fetish since I've always been modest and that ability to sympathize with the discomfort of public nudity made lolis in that situation a huge turn on for me. But I also have the empathy to not want to put anyone in that situation because I wouldn't want to be in it myself so theres really no harm done in just getting off to the fantasy.

>>3842 >has never engaged a topic, just gets mad >multiplies assblast from smug anime gifs

doing harm is for insecure power-hungry manlet cucks that will never be men and deeply know it and hate themselves >>3843 >It's okay because I have it kike >>3844 midget kike

all hurtcorekikes should be quickly executed unceremoniously and disposed of like garbage without fanfare to maximize rejection of them and their twisted defective kike minds

back to kikeygarden the kike safespace for hurtcorekikes

>>3845 >its not okay because I don't like it faggot

>>3848 projection of kike inability to empathize with others, basing all morality on their own best interest in pure manipulative psychopathy while also trying to claim they are different >>3843 it's not okay because lgs are people and your selfish needs should not supersede their happiness you rat faced kike dwarf

>>3846 >lumps everyone xhe disagrees with into the same group >says they should all be immediately killed and removed Such an anti mentality

>>3850 the only people that would defend hurtcorekikes are hurtcorekikes pedophiles love children you are anathema to pedophiles kill self subhuman

>>3851 >tosses the label at anyone because if they disagree or have the wrong opinion on anything, they're an anti/hurtcore kike

>>3849 You aren't even reading what I'm saying you're just getting triggered because my PP gets hard at something you don't like, who does that remind you of?

>>3852 >>3853 human garbage mope cope kill self to death don't belong here or alive

>dude not liking people that hurt and kill children is just like not liking people that love children because it's people that don't like people the amazing verbal IQ of the kike on full display here

>>3855 based antihurtcore gigachad nepi king dubs

>>3856 based antihurtcore gigachad nepi king singles

>>3856 >>3857 based antihurtcore gigachad nepi king samefagging

>>3856 >>3857 >>3858 based antihurtcore gigachad nepi king spam

>>3840 Why don't we just build a giant railgun to shoot garbage into the sun? I feel like that would solve several problems at once. Mainly alien invasion defense and pollution, but it would also probably put people to work too. >>3853 Disliking people into hurtcore and hating pedophiles are two different issues entirely. The reasoning antis have for hating pedophiles is founded largely in myths and societal gaslighting. This is why they can't form arguments, provide sources, etc etc. There is nothing to base their argument on because they are basically arguing against nature, and thus they employ the tactics we see constantly. Disliking hurtcore and the people who like it is not the same because the people arguing against it here are not drinking society's kool-aid at all. The rationality is simple and explicit, hurtcore is about hurting children and hurting children is intrinsically wrong. We could talk all day long about why hurting children is wrong, but you would lose that argument no matter how hard you tried because you would (again) literally be arguing against nature. Harming offspring is unnatural. The difference is in both who and why, stop pretending like this is the same as niGGers screeching about clothed stock photos of toddlers.

>>3852 Antis are specifically anti-pedo. I think most people (pedo and anti alike) can at least stay together on the "hurting children is wrong." Hurting children is terrible. Period. The only difference, I think, is that many anti have a broader stroke on what is "hurting" children.

>>3860 our glorious BO has the best anti hurtcore posting algorithm of them all a railgun that shoots kikes into the sun genius this is my beautiful baby wife and I love her and this part of the post is unnecessary and wholly unrelated to all posts itt

>>3862 She cute

>>3861 antis have more in common with hurtcore kikes than pedos because lots of antis hurt children whether intentionally or through disregard for their agency and well being hurtcorekikes are antipedo in the most direct form they are anti child love and pro-child hurting you don't hurt people intentionally if you love them pure kike neurosis

>>3863 ty I love her

>>3860 >Why don't we just build a giant railgun to shoot garbage into the sun? 1) It would need to be many kilometers long and go up a mountain, and be an engineering nightmare 2) Hitting the sun is surprisingly difficult while flying past it at 30 km/s, it would be a pretty massive nightmare

>>3860 You didn't read what I said either, thats why its comparable to the way an anti treats these arguments because they so often don't even bother to read what you're saying and just go off on their usual bullshit like you just did.

>>3866 still based af though and a valuable use of resources

>>3867 >has admitted to getting hard for children in pain >dood not fair I'm not like the other hurtcore kikes prove it go blow your brains out that would be based af

real pedophilia aka. real childlove loves children enough to press a magical delete-all-sexually-attracted-to-children-in-any-way button that would save all children from hurtcorekikes at the cost of themselves I would dab on that button because I hate you kikes

>>3869 You strawman me as wanting the right to hurt children just as much as someone would want the right to love them. You're acting like an anti whose made up their mind about someone being a sick fuck that deserves a bullet before they've even heard them out.

The manlet and anti tactic is to ignore what someone says categorically and wish death upon them. What that person actually does is irrelevant, it's merely the act of thinking that condemns them.

>>3871 it doesn't matter if you want the right that you have the desire is enough for me to judge you as subhuman garbage you are defective >>3872 >still this asshurt he will never be able to reach the top shelf kill self and reincarnate for reroll

Imagine being granny and thinking reason and speech will reach the people you disagree with, and instead it's just one autistic manlet sperging about it

>>3873 >that you have the desire is enough for me to judge you as subhuman garbage Where have I heard that before?

hurtcorekikes are kikes and can't be reasoned with >>3875 in an argument against love which is wholly unequatable in every way you miserably retarded jewish parasite try this shit on niggers who are dumb enough to not notice the massive elephant in the room you want to pretend you're smart enough to lead me around

kikes are dumb as shit, twice as ugly and smell three times as bad they want to pick on kids because kids are pure, based, and have potential for great things kikes have nothing and transfer self-hatred elsewhere despicable

>>3877 based antihurtcore gigachad nepi king dubs

>>3876 it doesn't matter if its an argument about love that you have the desire is enough for me to judge you as subhuman garbage

>>3864 >antis have more in common with hurtcore kikes than pedos Hmm, I can see this being true. I always see anti in the same way that I see the pro-life degenerates: they'd rather push their views on other people regardless of the effect it has on the child. A child vying for love and attention from an adult? WRONG! A would-be parent accepting the fact that they can't raise a child in a healthy environment and deciding to terminate pregnancy? WRONG. Both of them amount to (in my opinion) anti-child more so than anything else and seek only to suppress others.

>>3866 Idk if it necessarily has to fit thouse constraints. Idk offhand what the minimum force to break earth's orbit is, but if you could just achieve that it would be sufficient. Maybe even less. You have the benefit of very large gravitational forces that would act on their own. A railgun, strictly speaking, would only need to launch a projectile such that it would break earth's orbit and then fall into the sun from gravity. It happens to comets and shit all the time. No need to hit the sun dead on when the damn thing will just pull the projectile into it if it's going slowly enough. >>3867 Show me what you feel I missed. All your posts where very short, but maybe I missed something. Please help me correct my mistake, if what you are saying is true

>>3881 See: >>3843

stay asshurt kikes you are getting named bigly >>3879 purely derivative as always kike come up with ideas of your own for once no wonder you dumbass sandniggers need an autistic rulebook for everything you do you are like empty vessels >>3880 abortion is wrong avoid it via contraception, abstinence or proper planning sterilization for non-Europeans to be safe since they lack all self-control and are basically just animals

also not shitty birth control pills because environmental contamination it's also making puberty occur earlier in girls which is a crime against the entire pedo race you bastards

>>3883 >abortion is wrong A poor woman gets raped and you want her to carry the child knowing both would live in squalor when terminating the pregnancy would be better for everyone? Well, agree to disagree, then.

>>3882 Is hurtcore about harming children? Factually, yes Is hurting children objectively wrong in all cases? Absolutely yes it is Does the particular nature of the harm matter? No, it really doesn't What did I miss? Spell it out for me.

>>3885 I didn't say it wasn't sometimes necessary, only that it was wrong, and should be avoided. Rape is an edge case, if people were only having abortions during rape it'd be all but unheard of in every place niggers, arabs, chinks and jews don't live.

and kikes shouldn't live in all cases

>>3886 >Being a sociopath with a total lack of empathy is the destructive part >I have the empathy to not want to put anyone in that situation because I wouldn't want to be in it myself so theres really no harm done in just getting off to the fantasy.

>>3888 based tot chad hitler trips on relevant anti-kike statement

>>3880 >>3883 >>3885 Abortion is a tough choice. It certianly shouldn't be something that is encouraged as a last resort of birth control. You can't deny that terminating a pregnancy is the same as terminating a life before it even has a chance to live. On the other hand, allowing a child to live in endless suffering is also an unacceptable outcome. The solution is to make the foster-care system so good that mothers who can't raise their kids on their own will be secure knowing that their child will live a happy life no matter what. Alternatively, providing expecting mothers with everything they need to create a wonderful environment for the child. Ideally both at the same time. Then abortion won't be an issue because no child born will be allowed to suffer and thus eliminate any legitimate reason to end it's life before it even gets a chance to breathe.

>>3881 > such that it would break earth's orbit and then fall into the sun from gravity. That is not exactly how that works. It isn't a matter as simple as tossing it out and letting gravity do it. With it's velocity from Earth's orbit sending it away, the pull would swing it around, not into itself. Possibly in an incredibly amount of time it'll fall in, or the swinging around could crash it into any other gravitational body, or eventually launch it out of the solar system. Yes things hit the sun, but it's a lot more complicated than this. >you just have to reach escape velocity And you have to do it using a railgun, which will impart no further velocity after exiting the barrel. There's a lot of reasons we don't launch things into space by railgun. We spend insane amounts launching very relatively small loads in huge expensive rockets that are 95% fuel. A railgun that can accomplish this would be a truly monumental task. >>3885 Pretty much every move against abortion still permits it for cases of rape or medical emergency. Personally, I suppose abortion for the poor and non-white.

>>3891 foster children should be placed with loving pedos unironically best situation for both parties >wat if raep foster homes are rape central and staffed with nigger hurtcorekikes so the kikehurtcorekikes that abduct kids semi-legally can place them there to kill gentile children so it would on average be an improvement, and also pedos could have romantic partners which is good for them and would also help reduce rapes.

>>3889 >My fantasy is closer to a vanilla fetish than actual harm >I would never put it into practice for fear of it causing harm Unless I'm missing an implication of something more sinister that's not even hurtcore. You seem to be playing some kind of semantic game.

>>3892 sterilization is better opt-in with one-time payment is ideal because it appeals to the kind of short-term reasoning possessed by low-class subhumans

>>3894 Can you differentiate fantasy from reality?

kikes should get mandatory sterilization though because they are untrustworthy subversive parasites

>>3896 Yes

>>3894 >hurtcorekike is playing semantic game they do that

>>3896 Autistic manlet antis can't

>>3898 Then I don't see where the problem is, in the realm of fantasy there is no harm so there is no case for the moralfaggotry.

>>3899 based antihurtcore gigachad nepi king dubs >>3900 cringe hurtcorekike midget grannyfucker dubs of failure

>>3901 who do you trust more >guy that fantasizes about loving and caring for cute lgs >guy that fantasizes about brutally murdering lgs for no reason pick one

>>3903 Irrelevant.

>>3904 extremely relevant pathetic dodge hurtcorekike

just say you trust the child murderer more since he would enable your own mental illness

>>3905 Its just another anti argument Who would you trust around children someone whos not a pedophile or someone who is a pedophile? Therefore pedophiles should never be allowed around children.

>>3892 Yeah, but what determines how a moving body is affected by the sun is it's velocity. This is why some orbits are very elliptical, and why some "orbits" just have their trajectory altered. There's a lot of math to do but surely so long as the velocity of the projectile after it breaks orbit is slow enough that the sun would eventually get it than it would work out? I mean, maybe it's possible to leverage the earth's own gravity to execute a slingshot out of orbit? let's see some numbers. >>3901 Would you want to be around someone who fantasizes about murdering you? Probably not. But it's just a fantasy so it shouldn't matter, right? Really what you are afraid of is that person actually moving onto putting it into practice because the fantasy stops being enough. Recurring fantasies are representative of what we want to do, but can't for whatever reason.

>>3907 False equivalency. You are literally calling pedophiles anti-pedophiles.

>>3907 I would trust the pedophile because he has love for children and is more trustworthy around them, but you can't admit you are a kike that feels at home amongst child murderers.

>>3908 Fucking hell the comparisons to anti arguments never stop. "We can never allow pedophiles pornography because its just a gateway to child rape once the porn stops being enough" Fuck off with this shit. >>3909 Its perfectly equivalent, just as asking who would you trust more around a woman, another woman or a man. Therefore men shouldn't be allowed around women. Its a retarded argument used by antis against pedos and now you're using it too against me. >>3910 Bullshit, again if it was between trusting man with a woman or trusting a woman with another woman you would trust the woman more for a variety of reasons. That isn't a denouncement of all men, men just have more reasons to hurt women than other women do, just like pedophiles would have more reason to hurt children than people who aren't pedophiles.

>>3911 I wouldn't ever trust a granny lmfao bullshit

also what >pedophiles would have more reason to hurt children than people who aren't pedophiles pedophiles love children you mean hurtcore kikes? exactly, hurtcorekikes have reasons to hurt children (that they are kikes) so you implicitly agree with me that hurtcorekike fantasists shouldn't be trusted kill self

hurtcorekikes aren't pedophiles, pedo = child phile = lover hurtcore kikes don't love anyone they are broken subhumans with defective brains incapable of such emotions because they are kikes and niggers and other varieties of mudskin/chink that exist only to torment humanity on behalf of some cosmic evil

>>3913 Sadistic pedophiles are still pedophiles just like sadistic men are still men. The average man is not going to rape a woman but due to the increased likelyhood of that man being a sociopathic sadist whose sexual target is women that makes men inherently less trustworthy around a woman than another woman would be. But to make generalized actions against all men as a result is punishing the men that never would do that.

>>3916 nope sadism is antithetical to love you aren't and will never be pedophiles you should be a corpse with a bullet hole in the back of your head

>>3911 As it has been explained, it's not the same as an anti argument. Since I can see you are going to try to jew your way around everything, here is the reality. Hurtcore is defined generally as things that involve harming children. There is no hurtcore that exists that does not involve harming children. Liking hurtcore is therefore, by definition, liking things that involve hurting children. liking things that involve hurting children is not natural. It is not natural because one of the fundamental qualifiers of being a living organism is that you reproduce. There are no healthy animals on the planet that harm their own offspring. In cases where animals harm offspring, it is the offspring of rival pack leaders and is universally seen as a brutal act. In human beings specifically, the act of violence against children is associated with low intelligence and other shitty behaviors. These behaviors are seen as universally negative, because harming children threatens the survival of the tribe and the species. Harming children is also bad because they are easy prey. For the same reason sucker punching a blind man is bad, harming a child is bad. They can't do anything to stop you, they are helpless because people who harm them won't stop when they ask. Picking on the weak and vunerable is cowardly behavior. Fantasies represent what we want to do. People fantasize about dream vacations and happy situations because they want those things and it feels good to imagine those things. This is why mental health professionals will ask about violent thoughts. Because what you think about doing is a good indicator of what you might do, given the chance. Fantasizing about hurting children is bad because it is a strong indicator that you would act on it if you had the chance to do so, and doing so would be wrong. Do you need me to be more clear or are you up to speed now?

>>3916 You are correct. >>3917 Pedophile means an individual who is sexually attracted to children, not someone who loves children.

>>3917 Pedophilia is about a sexual attraction to children, love is definitionally irrelevant. You're like the vegans trying to redefine veganism to add on some ethical requirement on top making it so anyone who quits veganism was never vegan in the first place since if it was for the ethics they'd never quit.

>>3911 >men have more reasons to hurt women than women do you've never met a woman, have you? not familiar with which group has the highest rate of domestic abuse?

>>3918 I fantasize about loving and holding and caring for my beautiful baby/tot wife and ensuring her cunny is well stimulated at all times + she is giggling and happy and full of bliss >>3919 >>3920 to antipedo liars eager to forcibly include you kikes with pedophiles to paint us all like you so they can justify hating us because of you which you gleefully endorse because you also want to pretend you are one of us you are not kill yourselves

>>3920 More semantic games pedophiles are child lovers, hurting people is the opposite of loving them, therefore child hurters are the opposite of pedophiles.

>>3921 That's misinformation. That statistic isn't about lesbians between each other but experience with domestic abuse in the past.

>>3922 based antihurtcore gigachad nepi king dubs

>>3923 >pedophiles are child lovers Not necessarily, deal with it.

>>3924 dykes are psycho kikes too that's why so many feminists (also a kike movement) are dykes as well as shrek lookalikes >>3926 no kill yourself you aren't a pedophile

If you want to rape children to death you are still a pedophile.

>>3924 Your tactics are made of glass. Transparent and easily broken. >>3922 I fantasize about making everybody feel loved and appreciated however I can

>>3928 nope you are living garbage hopefully not living for long >>3929 based

>>3926 >>3928 It is now abundantly clear why hurtcorekikes are here.

>>3921 The vast majority of rapes are perpetrated by men against women. The vast majority of criminals are men, theres a variety of reasons why a woman is safer around another woman than a man.

>>3924 topkek, is this an actual roastie?

>>3932 The vast majority of rapists and criminals are niggers, arabs, chinks and kikes.

>>3933 It's a fact I'm sorry. A pretty obvious one too. Men are more aggressive than women and I don't think there has ever been any evidence of the opposite.

>>3934 That doesn't refute what I said even if it is accurate.

If you just took all of the niggers out of NYC it would have like 98% less violent crime. Men are totally the problem though, that's why places with men like Switzerland have rates more comparable to an NYC devoid of niggers than one with them.

>>3932 Rape as defined by the law can only be perpetrated by a man. The vast majority of convictions give women lesser sentences. >>3933 Ikr? Anyone alive on the planet for more than 5 minutes understands that grannies are the most sociopathically violent creatures on the planet.

>>3926 philia means love though

>>3936 It does if you aren't willfully ignoring which 'men' commit the crimes because you are part of the group of 'men' that does, hooknose.

>>3935 >men are more aggressive then women right so are you pretending to be retarded or were you just born this way?

>>3940 No it doesn't, they're men regardless.

>>3939 That doesn't matter because neoclassicisms are retarded. >>3941 that's an undisputed fact lol

You have to be >6'3" at least to be a man anyway if you are a kike you are almost certainly not <6'3" guys get turned into traps and have to nurse gigachads tot wives when they are busy with their smol cute pps bottom line fuckers >>3942 Aside from the above, only ethnic European men are men, every male from something else is subhuman first and foremost.

>>3943 >it's an undisputed fact https://web.archive.org/web/20170724102111/http://www.bestgore.com:80/guest-post/societal-misandry-in-the-anti-male-world/ with 70+ reputable sources at the bottom of the article

>>3944 based antihurtcore gigachad nepi king dubs

>>3935 ok but are you a woman?

all godlike nepi lanklets should be entitled to a stable of trap cuties to milk for their harem of tot wives deal with it

>>3935 Evidence to the opposite posted, post your own evidence jew

>>3939 A zoophile that gets caught raping and murdering a dog and then raping its entrails is still considered a zoophile.

hurtcorekikes can be turned into fertilizer and low value slave labor for dangerous tasks like finding the landmines in Vietnam and listening to grannies drone on and on about some dumb shit television show they watch that you don't watch and won't watch and are just fucking sick of hearing about already but they won't shut the fuck up

>>3950 by people who don't like zoophiles every post these retards make makes me more and more suspicious its an attempt at a falseflag. Are they talking about this on site or v yet?

>>3945 That doesn't prove anything. >>3947 nope >>3949 Just look at any country's crime statistics. I also never recall having been attacked or insulted by a woman, but only men.

>>3952 like I said earlier that's why I said don't even let them try to defend it because they are disingenuous kikes at best and absolute manipulative monsters at worst >>3953 >insulted by men confirmed lowly neurotic mess of a jew taunted by superior males

>>3953 >read a giant article with 70+ sources from official government resources and international news agencies in less than 10 minutes >claims it proves nothing yeah you are a niGGer aren't you

>>3952 No, by everyone. I've never seen a zoophile make a no true scotsman fallacy against another zoophile for being a sadist like you're attempting to do.

>>3953 >I never recall having been attacked or insulted by a woman, but only men I never recall being attacked or insulted by a man, but only women.

posting sexy chubby toddlers because I feel like it deal with it

>>3956 >its this common fallacy I googled its not the common fallacy you googled. try again.

>>3956 almost every zoophile will treat you like I treat you for being a hurtcorekike I'm a zoophile too for horses only and I hate you for that as well stop being such a kike fuck's sake

>>3955 Your first source was talking about "societal misandry", which I don't think has anything to do with aggression. Like I said before, just from crime statistics it's clear that men are more aggressive, and it is well known that testosterone increases both impulsiveness and aggression. >>3957 Yeah yeah, my anecdote vs yours, but in reality it's that men often commit crimes and assault more often.

>>3959 Saying that pedophiles who are sadists aren't pedophiles is a no true scotsman fallacy. Theres no requirement in the definition of pedophile that excludes sadists.

only time I've ever seen loving zoophilia equated to zoosadism is by antizoos like the tranny farms crowd who do the same to pedos because equating the two is an anti position

>>3963 >literally child lover >nooooo it doesn't count!1!1!

>>3965 It doesn't matter what it means literally, because whoever came up with adding "phile" to things in modern languages decided it means romantic attraction.

>>3965 Thats not the definition of pedophile any more than the definition of veganism has an ethical requirement. Both are cases of a no true scotsman fallacy.

>>3966 >It doesn't matter what it means >it means that >admits it kill self >>3967 it is though deal with it kike you ratnosed kike fags are supposed to be good at language manipulation but oops you're actually fucking stupid

>>3962 So you judged it by the title and then didn't even look at what was in it, meaning you didn't actually look at it at all and dismissed it entirely. Like what antis do. >yeah anecdote vs anecdote but actually my anecdote is a fact because I said so

>>3968 I guess homophilia must mean loving people that are the same as you then.

nearly every single post about men being violent and about people into hurtcore being pedos are from the same IP address. The only exceptions are the shitposters with the anime images who fucked off as soon as the discussion got serious. My almonds have been activated.

>>3970 yes, because people who have sex with people who are the same gender as them are called homosexuals.

>>3968 dictionary.com says its an attraction to young children merriam webster says its sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object wikipedia says its a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children webmd says its a person who has a sustained sexual orientation toward children, generally aged 13 or younger cambridge dictionary says its someone who is sexually interested in children No definition excludes sadists from being pedophiles, deal with it.

>>3970 if homo means same idk that one only concerned with pedophile which means childlover aka. not you since you are a kike and kikes are incapable of human emotions like love >>3971 the shitposters are the NTR kike >>3973 but the literal definition of pedo is child and phile is lover so deal with it

>>3971 Men are inherently more violent mostly due to male sex hormones and people into hurtcore can still be pedophiles by definition, prove me wrong.

>>3973 Do you want to hurt kids exclusively or do you enjoy the suffering of other beings too?

>>3973 I don't care. You get off to hurting children. You are not one of us and you never will be. I can tell you aren't a real pedo just by the fact that you think it's only about sex. That you see it as a word you can manipulate to include yourself in the group, as a clinical definition of things and not a group of people. It's not just about hurting kids, everything about you is the antithesis of what a pedophile actually is.

>>3974 If you want to be even more autistic you could say philos means "friend" rather than someone who loves, since that's what it actually means. >>3971 You should take a better look then. You are clearly arguing with two separate people. Also, I looked at your resource and nowhere does it disprove that men aren't more aggressive.

>>3975 Proof was posted and you dismissed it without reading it.

>>3979 That wasn't me, genius.

>>3979 What proof?

>>3973 This is correct, and the people arguing against it are likely the same people who accept that Loli=Pedo (double-standards?). Just because we pedos don't like the "subhuman" sadists who enjoy hurtcore doesn't mean that they aren't also pedos. You can't pick and choose just to try and make the group as a whole look better; we are stuck with the "hurtcore kikes" being in the same group as us, just like we are stuck with the delusional Lolicons.

Now that I think of it homophile means samefriend. That's how seriously you should neoclassicisms.

>>3978 you don't intentionally hurt your friends either kike so wouldn't change much for you

>>3982 The desire to hurt kids doesn't make someone a pedo though.

>>3977 based antihurtcore gigachad king dubs

>>3986 No, they are both different. Pedophile means they are attracted to children. Sadist means they enjoy seeing others suffer. Put them together and you have a hurtcore kike.

>>3984 >domestic violence lol, now compare that to assault statistics

>>3988 based antihurtcore gigachad king hitler dubs

everyone who hates hurtcore and hurtcorekikes is based everyone who doesn't is a hurtcorekike and should kill himself this is my other toddler wife

>>3982 I do find the role reversal interesting though. They went from demanding that baby fucking not be separated from pedophilia despite the harm because they fit into the definition yet turn around and say people into hurtcore despite fitting into the definition can't be included because of the harm they cause.

>>3993 >despite the harm >babyfucker it's all clear now

>>3991 That doesn't proof that men are more or less aggressive. Just that men are more likely to attack other men. >>3993 I'm not saying that though.

>>3993 >baby fucking oh look the antipedo anti-nepi kike is pro-hurtcore but accuses anti-hurtcore based nepis of being pro-hurtcore to attack nepis you are the worst of them all nepi love with consideration for the safety and happiness of the lg is pure and best

>>3996 I want to lick this girl's feet and cunny and make her smile and (you) want to torture her to death and you equate those things because you are a kike

>>3995 >4 full studies that show that women account for half or more of all domestic abusers >a study that shows men are 3 times more likely to get attacked on the street >lol but it proves nothing i still wont read the whole thing and just move the goalpost again nobody will ever take you seriously

>>3998 that's kikes for you

>>3999 based antihurtcore gigachad nepi king trips

>>4000 based antihurtcore gigachad nepi king trips

>>3996 I'm not pro hurt-core, I just think the definition of pedophile applies just as well to them as it does to you. I'm not going to use fallacies and disingenuous arguments to try and separate you from us like you're trying to do to separate hurtcore from pedophilia. Saying they're separate from use due to their disregard for the wellbeing of others is enough, and I think that works both ways as you disregard the potential for harm in what you do as well.

>>3993 I don't really know much about that to reply to be honest. I don't think babies or young children should be penetrated at all (I've seen far more negatives than I have positives in that regard). Oral, maybe, but I'm still on the fence about the whole thing (My AoA being much higher; ~12+).

>>4002 >I'm not pro-hurtcore I just want to lump child murderers in with pedophiles okay so you are an antipedo just as bad if you aren't just a lying hurtcorekike since all hurtcorekikes do is lie >>4003 tots want cunny licks too penetration no

>>4004 based antihurtcore gigachad nepi king symmetrical singles

>>3998 Women being victims less often doesn't make men less aggressive. Domestic abuse isn't even near as common as regular assault. I didn't "change the goalposts" even once.

>>4003 I've just heard too many stories of people feeling violated by having that kind of stuff done to them when they were too young to comprehend the world around them or even navigate it properly to ever consider it an ethical thing to do. Sure its not on the same level as hurtcore as that is an absolutely guaranteed damage to the child physically and mentally, but ignoring the potential damage you're doing to a child mentally in the future is still fucked if you ask me.

>>4006 >t. jew that moves every goalpost he sees just in case literally banned from multiple football fields for trespassing because it is pathological at this point >>4007 you just hate nepis and love antipedo propaganda and indoctrination antis and hurtcore kikes hurt kids cunny licks do not lying kike

>>4007 read >>93 for why feelings of abuse stem from societal gaslighting and why inherent harm is a myth

>>4009 this is the guy from the /pg/ that hates nepis he refuses to ever hear pro-nepi arguments and just spouts antipedo talking points

>>4009 We've been over this, being indoctrinated to feel violated for having sex at 12 is an entirely different ballgame than feeling violated because your rabbi sucked your dick after circumcising you. One is the result of indoctrination and one is not, if you can't understand this then please don't engage with me as I don't want to waste my time with you.

nepi girls deserve worship more than all other girls

>>4011 >equating cunny licks with genital mutilation wow it's been like what 2 weeks since you busted out that one you fucking kike rat

>>4002 >I just think the definition of pedophile applies just as well to them as it does to you But why? People can be into hurtcore for different reasons, it doesn't imply pedophilia.

>>4010 I'm getting really tired of this. It's just antipedos trying to falseflag. It's so painfully obvious it makes me annoyed. The anti-man anti-pedo anti-nepi shit just never changes and it's always so stupidly obtuse. I wish there were more pictures of cute tots having a happy time in a different thread so we could go back to having nice chats.

>>4013 And it still has yet to be refuted. >>4014 A child rapist doesn't necessarily have to be a pedophile either, but to say that no child rapist is a pedophile because of this no true scotsman fallacy is retarded.

>>4014 chief among them bigger niggers, kikes, niggerkikes or some other variant of subhuman. It never has anything to do with pedophilia, lust and romantic love for children isn't lust for inflicting pain. >>4015 if smolbox materializes we will drive them away with happy tots

>>4016 >And it still has yet to be refuted more like it's self-refuting equating permanent fucking genital mutilation to cunny licks and orgasms is full retard

this is my baby wife and she deserves to cum every diaper change deal with it

Yeah if anything this fiasco of a thread has convinced me to be stricter on hurtcore. Thread anchored.

>>4018 Whether the experience was pleasurable or painful at the time doesn't factor into the fact that it was done against their will. Nobody gives a fuck if you made them orgasm before they were even capable of remembering it, what they care about is that you made them do things against their own will.

>>4020 based! >>4021 no it wasn't tots love cunny licks antis indoctrinate them to think it is wrong but it's not and they should be pleasured too kill self antipedo hurtcore kike

>>4022 based antihurtcore nepi gigachad dubs

>>4022 No it wasn't what? Thats the closest thing to an argument in that shitpost and I still can't decipher it.

>>4024 it isn't done against their will tots can consent to cunny licks and if you think they aren't also more likely to consent to cunny licks than genital mutilation which is horrific to even see undertaken, and would probably make you hurtcorekikes a bit disgusted despite your jewish nature making you want to hurt kids I mean they literally scream like hell about how awful it is and you compare that to cunny licks plus genital mutilation has physical permanent ramifications as well you are despicable and I want to beat you to death tbh

>>4025 based antihurtcore nepi gigachad singles

>>4025 They have no will, you're exerting your will onto them in a total disregard to them being their own person that may or may not want to do this in the future once they're actually capable of rationality and decision making.

>>4027 >They have no will wrong babies and tots have the cutest and most pure lil personalities and they know what they like and don't and have no guile to hide it you are a fucking lying kike did you get confused? this is /hebe/ not /heeb/ go to temple and ask yahweh to fuck you

>>4028 Then why don't babies beg not to be circumcised?

>>4027 How much mental capacity is required to distinguish good feelings from bad ones?

>>4029 >screaming and crying isn't a clear enough 'no' for the ultra autistic kike neurotic retard brain

>>4037 Only happens after its done, how are they supposed to know that particular baby is against getting circumcised? Oh right they aren't for or against anything because they have no will, and for you to take advantage of that fact in order to use them for your own sexual pleasure will come back to bite you in the ass when they grow up and remember what you did to them in the earliest part of their life and feel violated by it because thats not what they would've wanted had they had their current mental capabilities then.

>>4041 >how do you know mutilating a newborn without painkillers of any kind is gonna hurt them blow your brains out and fucking die

>>4046 Thats not what I said.

buried your shit thread fuck you hurtcore kikes kill yourselves

>>4041 One is inherently harmful and the other isn't. You don't feel violated for something that felt good unless you are taught to, stigmatization is the problem.

>>4055 >You don't feel violated for something that felt good unless you are taught to You're literally making an argument for a society in which rape is permissible.

>>4056 >just gonna rehash every deleted /pg/ 'argument' since the hundreds of posts of him being btfo got deleted by his fellow antipedo kazoo

>>4057 Wasn't refuted then, won't be refuted now. screaming lalala I'm not listening in the form of putting this thread at the bottom of the board speaks for itself.

>>4056 If you define rape as sexual activity of two consenting parties where the one only feels bad after the fact and not in a single moment during the act. But only then.

>>4062 No I define rape as its actually defined, and someone feeling violated because they were raped despite having orgasmed during it against their own will is a perfectly reasonable response, not a result of stigmatization. You would have to create a society in which people treat being raped nonchalantly in order to justify what it is you're trying to justify.

>>4064 Well then I'm not advocating for such a society. I believe women can feel bad when they get raped despite having an orgasm.

>>4058 lying kike kill self

>>4065 Then why don't you believe a woman can feel bad about getting raped when they were 4 despite having an orgasm?

>>4068 If they didn't like what was happening to them (rape) they can feel bad about that, of course. If they agreed to everything and enjoyed every moment of it it's not rape in my opinion though.

>>4070 he says everything is rape because antipedos retroactively indoctrinate kids to hate sex they had but it's different with girls he likes because ??? even though the same thing happens jk he doesn't like girls he's an antipedo kike

>>4070 How can you determine if they'll look back on it in approval or disapproval? Some people don't look back on their circumcision as something to disapprove of, should we just assume everyone will act in that way and so that justifies circumcising everyone?

>>4073 I was circumcised and I'm happy I was. I don't know if a Jew sucked me off, though, and I hope not. I don't think I'd be happy with that.

>>4075 I'm not, genital mutilation is horrible. If I knew who did it I'd go kill that fucking kike rn. I avoid looking up his name to stay out of prison.

>>4075 Why is a jew sucking you off bad? Isn't pleasure inherently good until you're brainwashed otherwise?

>>4080 Hence why I said I don't THINK I'd be happy with that. I've never been sucked off by a man before and I don't think I'd enjoy it.

>>4080 >why is a kike with herpes sucking your bloody mutilated baby penis bad said the antipedo while saying pedos are bad unironically bereft of all self-awareness permanent irreversible physical harm and nerve damage is what antis want for kids they already inflict the mental trauma too antis are hurtcore kikes

>>4073 Any harm that may derive from being circumcised is clearly rooted in the act of the circumcision, therefore it can be considered dangerous.

>>4081 I can't see how you aren't sympathetic to my position on this when you say things like that. Why defend someone whos sucking toddlers dicks with no real concern if they're going to enjoy it?

>>4085 see >>4084 babies have gotten STDs and died from kikeshit afterward too extra-botched genital mutilation (there is no safe or sane method of genital mutilation, no phimosis does not require genital mutilation you good goy fag) can have even more disastrous results too, like the 2 brothers that killed themselves when their botched circumcisions made that psycho kike John Money make their parents raise them as girls and etc. Genital mutilation is evil.

>>4092 But potentially giving them STDs outside of circumcising them for your own sexual gratification is okay because?

>busy >come back to +140 posts I make great threads >>3971 I'd happily take the discussion seriously if anyone wants to. >>3973 >wikipedia says its a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children If you're only secondarily attracted to kids, are you not a pedophile? I find it a mildly strange definition >>3983 that sounds funny, like how newfag is sometimes changed to newfriend

>>4096 I think wikipedia might just be outdated, I remember most definitions being that way in the past.

>>4094 don't have any

>>4090 I'm not defending anyone sucking on bloody penises. I don't think anyone could feel pleasure in such a scenario regardless of age. In another, less painful scenario, where some adult sucked me off and, like with my circumcision, I didn't remember it? Hard to say how I might feel about it. I honestly don't think I'd care much. Maybe it'd depend on the person (stranger/family). I'd definitely feel a lot (maybe completely?) better about it if it was a woman; but I was raised in a county that hates gays--not that I hate them now as an adult. No clue! I don't know any boys/men who've experienced that (I mainly stick to learning about/talking to girls, and pretty much disregard all things involving males).

>>4103 But don't you think that uncertainty should be met with caution and waiting until the person can actually decide what they want rather than just assuming they won't feel violated by what happened to them later down the line? If not then why not?

>>4104 I think that depends on the community you're in. I come from a rather small community with lots of pedophilia, and MOST children I know who have had adult "lovers" have grown up fine. I can't think of a single one who has looked back on it with disdain for anyone involved, so my opinion is likely to be very biased. I personally would not pursue anyone I felt might be too young to understand, but I also don't shun pedos who do seek that out (I like talking with my LGs)

>>4107 god I wish I did

>>4104 On the one hand, I think you do have a point, but on the other hand, very young children are kind of helpless without you making a number of decisions for them. Some strictly necessary, like feeding and keeping them safe, but also forward-thinking decisions like what you teach them, how you aid their development, so on. These things are different from sexual violation, but if raised in a culture that sees absolutely no harm in sexual interactions, it may be in that case equivalent to just part of how you aid their development. Their development of sexuality, understanding of their body, or something? To be honest I can't make an argument any deeper than that for it, really just giving it some token thought.

>>4107 But when you say children who have adult lovers was that adult engaging with them sexually from when they were a toddler? >>4110 The problem is you'd necessarily have to have a society that has no value in consent in regards to sex for someone to not be violated by a sexual encounter they had no choice in when they were too young to even make a choice.

>>4113 except they can consent

>>4114 Not in any meaningful way that isn't down to the interpretation of the person who desperately wants do to sexual things to them for their own gratification, hardly an unbiased interpretation.

>>4116 you just can't read emotions because as a jew you can't experience them

>>4117 Yeah I'm sure all the blood rushing out of your head and into your groin really aids your ability to read their emotional state.

>>4113 Yeah, it's not a deep argument, it's surface level. Your reply does remind me of a conversation I wanted to have though, I should bring it up later when I have more time. >>4116 They can consent like a pet can, except they aren't sexually matured. They can still consent in the sense of reacting to what it happening around them and showing distress if they do not like it. Which is just however you feel about that

>>4120 I agree with you but I still think the consent of an animal is too heavily based on interpretation to be valid, and its lack of resistance can be more chalked up to how tame/trained it is than its desires. Thats an entirely separate issue though, my main concern with this particular subject is that they don't remain at that level of cognition forever. So to assume their lack of resistance at that stage as being tacet acceptance of whats being done to them that won't change for their entire life is just a disingenuous ploy to try and justify what sexually gratifies you.

>>4123 >e their lack of resistance at that stage as being tacet acceptance of whats being done to them that won't change for their entire life that's going to be part of the topic I bring up later, I think it'll be interesting not much point here since it's bump-locked

>>4127 Look forward to seeing it on the discussion thread, might as well abandon this one.

>>4123 I will only have any respect for you at all if you now admit that according to your logic it is a crime to hold animals as pets, as it is slavery. If however you say that's different, please get fucked. I myself think it's fine to own a pet, as long as it's loved and cared for and not abused and hated. That goes for head pats and knot suckys.

>>3762 Kids below the age of 21 should not be able to consent. Take it or leave it.

Even in a place like this, some people still feel a need to maintain a holier-than-thou mentality. I am dissapoint.

>>4422 >Even in a place like this Elaborate what you mean by this. Why do you expect people to be down with child torture on a pedo board?

>>4424 because he's a kike

So, before this thread reaches page 2, can we finally start talking about hurtcore? I'll start. I never considered myself as a sadist, I still don't. But lately I have had fantasies about child torture and rape (with crying and everything). Looking back at it, I think it was not that I enjoyed seeing children suffer, it's just that I thought that they looked "cuter" (i.e. helpless) that way. (After all, being cute is all about delicacy and vunerability.) Again, I'm not an actual sexual sadist, I only had those fantasies for a very short period of time in my whole life, and also I do not condone hurtcore or real child rape (that actually disturbs me in a quite deep level). I just think that having those fantasies helped me see a bit better though you guys' lenses. So, anyone else wants to share their experience on the thread? >>4422 Yes, I can see there are many people here putting feelings over facts here, which is something you can expect in almost any conversation regarding children, even among pedophiles.

>>4525 if you like hurtcore you're a sick fuck, regardless of the age factor. you could like hurtcore with grannies for all i care, still a sick fuck.

>>3777 how did he blackmail them? sounds based

>>4265 21-year-olds are still small kids, you sick fuck anyone under the age of 40 should not be able to consent

>>4525 blow your brains out immediately

i know i am capable of some heinous shit, i just also know i would probably end up in prison if i acted on the desire, so i don't bother at least i can fantasize

>>6717 evil hurtcore jew killing adults is fine though. especially adults who aren't the same race as me (white).

>>6717 you can't go to prison if you kill yourself *taps forehead*

>>3812 >another pedo moralfagging and not letting me wank in peace another site doomed to be forgotten enjoy your irrelevancy and inevitable descent into a circlejerk as anyone seeking anything interesting finds out that even on fucking pedo boards pedos have to moralfag against other pedos also fuck you totfag, you keep reposting the same pics and spam everywhere

>>6844 if you actually fap to hurtcore then you aren't a pedo you're a nigger and you should neck yourself nigger

>>6844 Discussion on /hebe/ will die without me Smolbox will never be made /hebe/ will die after smolbox Smolbox will die in a month Smolbox will become irrelevant soon <- you are here Smolbox wont grow much more than it has Smolbox will never survive a year Smolbox will never grow bigger than 8moe Smolbox will get taken down by the feds and SO will go to prison I will become an hero to stop smolbox!

Take all instances of "hurtcore" in this thread, replace them with "pedophile" or "lolicon" and you can pretend you're on 4chan /pol/ arguing with antis about why loli or cute lg instagram pictures are morally acceptable. it's the same exact moralfagging and virtue signalling, right down to the vocabulary and syntax. I'm laughing my ass off over here. People never change, it's always the same. It doesn't matter where you go or how "free speech" people claim to be, there's always a bad guy and there's always someone they're willing to censor to feel better about themselves. It's sad to say but it seems there's nobody out there that actually cares about free speech and doesn't have an asterisk to slap on it, even in a pedo community. I can't even watch hurtcore, but according to most of you folks I can only be a good person if I advocate for censoring those who do enjoy it. I refuse to partake in that charade.

>>6849 >Torture is equivalent to love. Bigots. Thats your argument. Fucking really? All that effort post and this lazy drivel is all you wanted to communicate? You really don't see a difference? Honestly?

>>6850 You're so wrapped up in your moralfagging that you can't even understand what I wrote. Put aside your emotions for two seconds and realize that speech doesn't need to be moral to be allowed. Where did this silly notion sneak in? The last time I checked, literal torture videos featuring adults are regularly posted on basically all image boards. But apparently when the people involved are a little younger, we have to censor them all of a sudden? Yeah, when you start making rules like that, I'm going to compare it to how normies view cp because that's exactly how they see it. They'll say shit like "you're seriously comparing art to pedophilia? you really don't see a difference?" The only difference between you and a normie is that you think adults and children can have sex morally in some cases, and normies think it's immoral in all cases. Or in other words, they think all adult/child sex amounts to hurtcore. It's just a matter of where you draw the line.

>>6851 >speech doesn't need to be moral to be allowed. Shit thats a good point. Yeah nevermind your right. Shits gross, but you are objectively correct.

>>6852 I'm glad you acknowledge this important fact. That's the hallmark of a true free speech believer vs. someone who simply has loose morals.

>>6851 >normie go back. you make a good point about speech not needing to be moral to be allowed, but your posts are a little meandering and can be very easily interpreted as above (i.e. hurtcore is the same as pedophilia). Hurtcore is hurtcore, though, and pretending there isn't an actual line that can be rationally drawn is dishonest. It's like saying people who cream their pants over kicking puppies are zoophiles. The difference is that a hurtcore kike gains pleasure from hurting something that can't defend itself (which in the context of this board happens to be hurting children, and in the context of a zoophile community would be hurting animals), and a pedophile/zoophile/whatever the fuck gains sexual pleasure from a group. A hurtcore kike creaming his pants over punting an infant into a volcano isn't a pedophile because his sexual pleasure comes from the act of harming the child, and not the child themself. It's a very passionate issue for actual pedophiles because tolerating it at all is not only fundamentally opposed to what most of them believe but also makes it impossible to change the perception. Try convincing a prospective employer you are a professional wearing a 10 year old crusty undershirt and a nazi flag in the background, and you'll get the idea. The other thing I tend to notice is that people who complain about free speech (or the perceived lack thereof) often attach the "this is a free speech place/platform/whatever" to where ever they happen to be. Not every board is /b/ or /pol/, and boards have topics that should be applied at the discretion of the BO, site admin, or whoever else. You wouldn't go on the anime board and complain that you aren't allowed to post about seinfeld or friends or whatever other shitty TV shows are famous. This board was born from pedos getting their space on /b/ nuked, which means it is the pedo board. Hurtcore, as I explained above, is not pedophilia and is therefore off topic. It's not censorship anymore than any other board enforcing it's specific topic. The other thing I notice about frozen peach farmers such as yourself is that you always find a reason to whine about what exists, but never do anything about it. You never invest your time or your money into a site. There are a few "free speech" people (though admittedly might just be using it as an excuse) who spend all day finding petty ways to attack new websites for whatever petty reasons they have. I'm not accusing you of that, but just a reminder that your crowd doesn't actually do much except whine. With that in mind, what have you done other than complain about it and why do you feel entitled to have someone else create something you want for free? I said you meandered at the beginning of this post, but I probably have as well somewhat. I suppose we can all stand to improve.

>>6854 >Try convincing a prospective employer you are a professional wearing a 10 year old crusty undershirt and a nazi flag in the background, and you'll get the idea. If he has a nazi flag in his office that sounds like his problem

>>6849 To quote Derek Chauvin: die nigger

>>6855 *badum psssshhh*

>>6854 A lot of this is just irrelevant honestly. I have no interest in squabbling over whether or not hurtcore should technically be classified as a pedophilic interest, nor do I have any interest in arguing over the morality of hurtcore content. There are multiple people in this thread calling for censorship and violence against people who enjoy hurtcore and I am simply saying that hurtcore is speech in the same way that ISIS execution videos are. Never did I say that this board needs to host hurtcore content. You can't even post regular cp here, so that would be a pointless thing to argue. But it's very clear that many people in this thread think hurtcore should be censored in general, which I strongly disagree with. I understand that there's a self-preservation instinct in pedos, an instinctual sacrifice to appeal to the normalfag. It doesn't work and it doesn't matter. Virtue signalling about hurtcore will not make anyone sympathetic to you. Abandoning the principle of free speech to pointlessly chase after the approval of people who hate you is humiliating and stupid. As for why I haven't personally created a free speech platform, it should be pretty obvious. It takes a certain type of person to pull this off. You need a lot of free time, decent programming skills and experience, a decent amount of money to burn on hosting, DDOS protection, domain registration, etc. I have less than one of those things. Many people are in the same boat. All I have to offer is my argument. Hopefully some anon with the qualities I listed above reads my posts and decides to put his resources to good use.

>>6858 >Virtue signalling about hurtcore will not make anyone sympathetic to you If you were one of us, or if you had a brain in your skull, you would understand why it's not virtue signaling nor inconsistent. Now go take yourself out back

>>6858 >discussing what is on topic for the board is irrelevant to what is allowed on the board wew >I have no interest in squabbling "I have no interest in considering other peoples thoughts and opinions", why did you even post then? >Think hurtcore should be censored It should be banished to its own shitty corner of the internet and should not be allowed to grow like a cancer anywhere else >I strongly disagree with Because you are a hurtcore kike, perhaps? Why would care so much about the right to talk about loving baby murder if you werent a baby murderer? >Self preservation instinct in pedos All human beings have self preservation instincts. Whats being described is a desire to not be ostracized as monsters. >To appeal to normalniggers ... doesnt work Worked for women, worked for blacks, worked for gays, is working for trannies, will work for pedos if society doesnt collapse before that happens. >Abandoning the principle of free speech Every single board that isnt /b/ abandons free speech by virtue of having a topic, apparently. At least by your standards. >You need free time not really, it can be done across a few afternoons or over a weekend >decent programming skills nope, just the ability to think critically, read instructions, and use a linux terminal >experience Smolbox was put together by a fag who hadn't even been a janny before this board. If experience is a requirement to do things than nobody can do anything because everyone had no experience at some point in their lives. Or do you think people are just born with light-up mechanical keyboards in their hands? >decent amount of money it's literally like $20 a month or less, including VPN costs, DDoS guard is free, domain is a one time purchase and is dirt cheap, etc. >I have less than one of those things What you do have is a lot of bullshit, though >Many people in the same boat Many people are also full of shit, literally anybody can do this >All I have to offer is my whining and complaining Then leave, because nobody cares what you have to say. Create something meaningful, do something worthwhile, or kill yourself for being no better than a retarded normalnigger. >Hopefully I complained hard enough so that somebody else will do everything for me so I can also complain there because I will never be happy ever heh

>>6858 >that many people it's the totfag replying to himself the tots he posts aren't even cute, I have better ones saved

>>6861 >he wildly claims and then posts none

>>6862 sorry bro, I'm not a cuck my tots are for my eyes only

>>6860 isolating pieces of sentences and strawmanning with snarky remarks is not a legitimate rebuttal

>>6864 >isolating abreviating is not isolating, segmenting things so that it's clear which piece I'm responding to is not strawmanning, telling you facts such as "everything you said about what is required to make a website is wrong" and "not every board is /b/" are not snarky remarks. You deserve snarky remarks though, because you are a whiny retard who wants other people to do everything for you and you think that a board having a topic is a violation of your free speech. Video related, stop embarassing yourself.

>>6865 I never said the things you claim I said. If you read my previous posts you would know that. You're arguing with a literal strawman. The person you're talking about does not exist.

>>6866 And now jew argument tactics! I suppose that means I win.

>>6867 You can claim victory against a nonexistent opponent, sure. But that's a very meaningless victory. What do you gain by mischaracterizing everything I say and then calling me a jew for protesting?

>>6868 I gain these singles, useless waste of space kike

>>6861 barely posted in this thread at all delusional retard you have shit taste

>>6870 totfag, 90% of the schizoposts ITT are you seething

>>6876 rent free

>>3812 >Pedophilia isn't wrong. How could love be amoral? Lust is not the same as love you retard.

>>6915 >Lust Sounds like somebody doesn't understand that people who don't have the same sexuality as him also have emotions. Uh oh!

>>6917 please stop replying to the mentally ill

>>6920 hating tots was the first clue

>>6921 sorry it was meant for >>6915 you are the mentally ill

>>6923 >It was meant for someone else >you are the mentally ill delusional sperg

>>6849 >People never change, it's always the same. It doesn't matter where you go or how "free speech" people claim to be, there's always a bad guy and there's always someone they're willing to censor to feel better about themselves. Of course it is, I'm not a pedo but for the most part there isn't really a freedom of speech question, but what it the limit, how far should people go with their speech. Most people including you have a limit, it's not really to feel better about themselves it's because they just dislike it and are apathetic to the content. This same thought process happened when /hebe/ was banned , many people on the original site mainly on gamergate threads liked the fact that it died, it was basically a huge liability. The same thing happened when 8chan died, many 4gaggers were pissing themselves on twitter saying that it was a good thing that 8chan died and that the site was horrible. Currently internet censorship is increasing across the globe, and it will increase futher in the future as more people are influenced by communities and stories on the internet. But this is mainly being done by corporations like YouTube and cloudflare who are being pressured more into censoring certian content by governments around the globe, trying to find the line when it comes to freedom of expression. But it is also done by ISPs on behalf of governments. https://news.umich.edu/extremely-aggressive-internet-censorship-spreads-in-the-worlds-democracies/ https://www.theneweconomy.com/technology/a-sorry-site-8chan-gets-the-axe-raising-questions-about-internet-censorship https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/03/24/online-moderation-tech-stack/

>>3831 >If you lack that instinct, or it's very weak, I think something isn't quite right. I actually don't like children or the idea of having them.

>>3935 Do people disagree with this statement because they’re so docile and feminized that they cannot imagine males being more aggressive than females?

>>7121 I'll bite the hook. People disagree with it for a number of reasons. Here are a few: >This statement does not match both lived experience and statistical data, both of which strongly indicate that women are more violent and aggressive. >This statement is often made by people who have an agenda against men, and since man-hating femoids have not changed the script in like 15 years, everyone knows who they are immediately or just dismissing them as lazy trolls. >Data shows men are more likely to be attacked than women are, and that women make up at least 50% of all domestic abusers. The legal system is biased against men, every major media outlet is constantly discussing that men are evil, and we live in a very anti-male world. Strictly speaking, most guys are tired of it, and it's cathartic to pick the low hanging fruit where you don't have a huge establishment bearing down on you for stepping too far out of line. There are plenty more reasons to disagree, but the core point is that there aren't really any reasons to agree with this. It simply isn't true. Here is some literature, with a good few sources of it's own all at the bottom: https://web.archive.org/web/20170724102111/http://www.bestgore.com:80/guest-post/societal-misandry-in-the-anti-male-world/

>>7095 >I actually don't like children Why are you here?

>>7129 Baited on the overboard

>>7129 rape

>>7156 kill self jew

The era of society being a bunch of pussies waiting for the cops to deal with you is ending. You'd better learn to moralfag, you're going to need to.

>>9156 Lol. You got anything else to say great keyboard warrior?

>>3860 Based rational BO. I consider myself an enlightened anti and ylu have my respect.

>>4525 Did you know its a pretty common sexual fantasy? Freud noticed it appeared routinely in his patient's reports, he wrote a text about it called "a children is hit" or something something. Youre not sick in the head, not so much I mean. Try to look at it under a different light.

>>3773 >blackmail/coercion is hurtcore Why do this and rape need to be put under an umbrella term. There's already tags for both with hentai. Do forced or guro count?

>>4525 I get what you mean, the act itself is not what bring you pleasure but its seeing the side that is normally hidden, the sort of vulnerability and helplessness you'd expect to see when one's guard is down or broken. A sort of emotional core if you will, that you wish you bear witness to in a paternal sense?

Why do many people have such a hardon for protecting children? Children aren't different than any other type of human. Most of them are terrible. Many of them are assholes. And the majority of the terrible ones will grow up to be terrible adult humans and do nothing but hurt other people and ruin everything they touch. What's the deal with this ridiculous massive blanket assessment that ALL children are worth protecting? Most of them fucking aren't, and most of the genuinely good children are already plenty protected by their loving parents. I'm not saying I want to HURT kids. I would get absolutely no joy or pleasure out of that at all. But at the same time, whenever I see a shitty kid get what's coming to them I'm not upset either.

>>10334 Because, for the most part, children can't protect themselves. It's incredibly easy to force them to do things, to hurt them, to take things away from them, and to deny them things like agency and respect. They cannot retaliate against somebody older than them because of the difference in physical strength and size. It's roughly the same reasoning as old school people who insist hitting women is wrong and that women need to be taken care of and protected. As for why it applies to every kid instead of just the nice ones, just because a child is acting like a shithead doesnt mean they don't deserve love and care. If a child is having a meltdown, acting out, or some other third thing then chances are there is a reason behind it that they don't know how to articulate. I'm a pedo, I believe children should be treated with respect, love, and in general like human beings. That doesn't mean I'm going to pretend like I (an adult) can handle things and articulate my feelings and thoughts in ways a child can't. They don't have enough experience in life to voice, for example, why it makes them upset that the teacher dismissed them. They don't know how to put into words that they feel like they aren't being loved. It's not that they don't have emotions and feelings and complex ideas and things, it's putting those things into language; They just don't have the necessary skills to voice it the way an adult does. Every child deserves the chance to build that experience.

>>10335 >Every child deserves the chance EVERY child? (image is allowed because she's 19 now and in this image)

>>10336 Yes, how they use that chance (or waste it) is up to them. In the case of people who do things because they are mentally ill, I'd be willing to wager the parents have some measure of responsibility. Either they failed to notice the problem and get their child help, or they were part of the problem to begin with.

>>10337 Naw man fuck that. If you kill another human being NOT explicitly in self defense I don't care how old, mentally ill, or drugged you are you are guilty of murder and deserve to die.

>>10338 You think a toddler who found his dads gun and accidentally fires it, killing someone, should be executed? You think a person who is disabled and cannot function being left alone with a weapon is at fault for hurting themselves or others? You think a person, whose brain or mind is measurably unwell, is solely responsible for their actions when they are enabled (through negligence or through direct action) to do harm to others? Explain to me how you are any different from a hurtcore kike, if you can so easily dismiss all particulars and declare that it is reasonable and just to end the life of a person in all those cases and more, without even allowing for some degree of flexibility.

>>10339 Also, that your immediate response is to just kill them, rather than exhaust every other possible option first, makes you no better then a murderer. The death penalty is necessary sometimes, but it should be the absolute last resort.

>>10336 clearly still an evil kike look at her face will do it again would bet money on it

>>10339 >>10340 ohhh be still, my bleeding heart every case is unique and dealt with differently, and an accidental misfire is dealt with vastly fucking differently from an intentional STABBING the slenderman stabber cunt didn't even KILL the girl, but she stabbed her fucking 20 GODDAMN TIMES what, did she ACCIDENTALLY lure her friend out to the woods and stab her in the kidney and stomach and only by a stroke of luck miss a major artery????? she's a horrible human and needed to be killed and there are countless others like her getting the benefit of the blanket notion that "children are innocent and/or too stupid to understand what they're doing" and society is quickly filling up with adult sociopaths actively manipulating the system the ruin life for other people also, you're retarded kiss my ass

>>10342 You're going to encounter endless simping from the faggot retards that go AUWAUWWUAW YANDERE UUUUUUUUHhHHhHHH h JUST LIKE MY ANIEMEESESESe every time. Don't be surprised, the tragedy is the simps are never the ones getting murdered.

>>10342 Complete misrepresentation of what I just said. I did not say it was an accident you lying kike, you just want to play mental gymnastics to justify that you absolutely want to end peoples lives and you are hiding behind "but they are bad though" as an excuse. What do you think antis do, when they talk about murdering pedophiles? "Its okay, because they are bad/dont count as people". Also, that isnt a child, and this completely falls in line with what I am saying. look at that face, she will kill again, and it will be the fault of the retard lazy kike doctors who let her go. The stabbing was just as much the fault of parents ignoring the warning signs as it was the child's. Its not that she isnt responsible, its that she isnt the only one and that is what I was saying in response to your question. But go ahead, deliberately misrepresent me and call me names, you know what your doing. >>10343 >woman is involved, therefore simp quote a single line in this entire thread from anybody at all that can even remotely be considered anything even tangentially related to "simping" you insane incel.

>>10383 oh shit the simp is maaaaaaaad

>>10384 Wow dude incredibly epic troll you sure got me. I can't believe I fell for the old "I'm a retard look at me" routine! You sure showed me, and I sure had it coming for expressing a thought longer than one sentence fragment! Gosh I guess I'll just go tell wizchan that it's over and that I'm gonna kill myself

>>10383 Defending crazed granny killers is simping, put 'em down they're of no use to anyone, not even fit to be bred anymore since they'll just kill their babies next.

>>10385 kek not even me you were replying to btw way to go, spaz

be excellent to each other or end up in the containment thread. Don't defend crazy psychos that stab cute 12 year olds and don't bully the disabled.

>>10388 > Don't defend crazy psychos that stab cute 12 year olds rulecuck

>pedofags: "omg we are unnecessarily opwessed! pedophilia is a form of child love!!1!!" >also pedofags: cancerous sociopatj faggotry

>>10861 I never claimed any of that I have always been a believer in kindness and love :^)

>>10868 >amoral thread >can't even speak my mind anymore yeah rulecucked

>>3783 >Is there a lot of overlap with hurtcore fans and yukkuri abuse? Yukkuri abusers are mostly chubby Japanese sixth graders on 2ch that take their aggression out with drawings, since they can't make school shooting threats because only military can have guns in nippon.

>>10870 cuck thread on cuck board