IS THAT ILLEGAL? HE SCULPTED THE BOOBAS TOO SMALL!?? SNEERTH

It's a nigger, disgusting.

This is begging to be made into a sculpture thread, and I'd like just like to point out that being sexually attracted to these sculptures in no way makes me a pedophile because they aren't real.

>>4565 has no artistic value because it wasn't made by a gook so hah /v/ wins again

>>4565 That reminds me, marble and various other materials will discolor over time if exposed to skin oils, namely from people touching them. There's a lot of cleavage sculpted out there that has way way more discoloration than the rest. I wonder if there's any child sculptures that have obvious evidence of people touching them inappropriately.

>>4567 >inappropriately you mean appropriately?

>>4567 I doubt there would be publicly accessible statues of lolis that could be subject to that, maybe in france as they haven't let western prudishness beat them down.

>>4570 where to commission giant marble nude toddler for front lawn?

>>4571 Why not just set up a sign that says "I am a sick fuck please deface my property" and save yourself the money?

>>4571 Commission a nude statue, come up with a basic bullshit artsy plaque to put on it so anyone wary thinks it's gucci, and then donate it to be placed in a public but not super open spot, like along a trail with trees and bushes around That way anyone can molest the statue and slowly discolor it until normies get really really uncomfortable

>>4576 I don't think they're obligated to put your smutty statue in public just because you donated it, and seeings as its now politically correct to destroy statues you don't like it wouldn't last long either way.

>>4572 There is nothing sick about it other than implied macrofaggotry (which is just weird) but that's not why I want her to be giant, only so that her fat tot cunny could be more readily admired from afar. >posts a bunch of little girl statues because he admires their beauty >you're a sick fuck for wanting a littler girl statue to admire its beauty Are you anti-2D totcon too? Or just 3D sculptures? CGI? Real? Where is the line in the sand for your sick fuck standard, and why is it exactly at the border of what you like you hypocritical little shit? >>4576 I want it for me not the normalfags.

>>4582 >nudity is smut >posts nude statues full retard

>>4584 >>4585 >can't distinguish opinions I personally hold from the average opinion that someone looking at the statue would hold despite the contradictory nature of what it is I'm posting wew lad

>>4589 >expects me to know what his opinions are when the only sign of them is his implying it's sick fuckery in >>4572

>>4582 >>4589 This is why you need to artsy plaque to explain it away

Do you guys not even realize that there's already a fuckton of tot-girl sculptures around? Or cherubs. If anything people are less likely to cry foul at a naked toddler statue. Look at how people respond to non-sexual child nudity on normalfag venues where young babbies/tots are more often nude to less anti outbursts.

general purpose art also like that one sunscreen with the tot ass on it people want tot ass on the products they consume

>>4594 >>4597 Just because people are less concerned about the person who wants to fuck a cherub than the average pedo doesn't mean you can have a monument to your sexual interests in your front yard and not face repercussions.

>>4611 It's a moment to tots and how based they are. It's not dissimilar to the universe which itself only exists to show everyone how based tots are.

>>4612 monument* moment? idk I had a stroke

The boy is a work of art.