The jews, christkikes, feminists.

"Non-offending" pedophiles are just denied as being pedo, maintaining the illusion of 100% offense rate.

Just the media's way of taking control of all the kids so they can r*** them themselves.

>>8947 These days they acknowledge non-offending pedos but equate them with their pet virped cuckolds

just want to cuddle with a lg

>>8972 inappropriately cuddle

>>8975 kiss neck and pinch cheeks

>>8942 Why do mother bears react aggressively when you come near their cubs. Same basic principal.

>>8977 Bears get the rope too.

>>8977 Because you're a stranger and you're not even the same species

The natural instinct to protect children from snatchers has been misdirected toward something that had been practiced in a legitimate fashion since time immemorial. Men who like them young were able to marry a very young girl. They'd get to enjoy her during those years they like most, but marriage is for life. It would also force these men to grow beyond some coomer fetish. A husband would experience his wife throughout her life span, from early adolescence to old age, and for the purpose of forging a family, not just busting a nut. What we've got now is a system of sacred whoredom so long as it's with underage boys. Virtually no girls make it to adulthood as virgins, thus the men who shoulder society's weight are cucked by teenage boys. This won't last because no system that fails to cater to the men who uphold society does. >tl;dr: You can be a very happy hebe for a few years under highly traditional Christianity. Age of consent and Social Gospel is heretical and counter to the actual Christian order of things. But you will then have to put it aside and perform your duty as the ruler of your family. This is the best deal you've got.

>>8980 baby marriage and kill all christkies

>>8981 christkikes*

>>8982 Christkings*

>>8980 One of the medieval kings of England married a 6 year old, and biblically there's nothing that requires your wife to be adolescent.

>>8985 whoa now only your dead kike on a stick is a king in your cringe jew religion, you're his tranny bitch of indeterminate genetic origin (because kikes = niggers = europeans in christkikery.) All christkikes should be killed.

>>8988 dubs of truth

Turn all Abrahamic believers into babies and marry them off to African warlods.

>>8990 no, babies are cute and deserve to be happy philosemites can stay manlet retards and be married off to nigger warlords since they love racelessness so much

christkikes are why niggers still exist christkikes are why this site is full of boards about niggers raping lgs christkikes are worse than kikes because they could be something other than what they are, but they reject their blood and embrace jewish ideology instead

This is why we'll never be taken seriously.

>>8994 because of christkikes

>>8994 It's literally just one retard. Stop acknowledging him and he will get bored eventually maybe.

>>8996 >christkikes throwing pedos under the bus to preserve christkikery as always eternal traitors loyal to the kike first every time

>>8997 You're more of a nigger tbh

>>9002 Suck a fart out of my ass

>>8997 throwing retards under a bus(literally) is my hobby

>>9002 >>9004 Cope, nigger loving, kike worshiping, subhuman manlet.

>>9008 I'll pray for you.

I think Christians just enjoy to be killed.

>>9014 >I will talk to myself schizo

he's right christcucks have been intrusive into this issue and campaigned worldwide against pedos.

they also assist jews to do the same.

jews are the bridge between christcucks and radfems.

>>9219 >>9220 >>9221 What a cultured man

notice how as soon as i left, the zioshit started working on the next propedo here? out comes the schizo tag.

this will happen wherever i leave. they will see the opportunity to begin antishit on the remaining few.

>>9219 How, when Christianity holds that an elderly man marrying a 12 year old is fine? It's clearly not Christianity they subscribe to, but some sort of heresy, or maybe even covert Satanism. The Social Gospel Movement is very clearly Satanic, now that we're more than a century out and can see the catastrophic results.

>>9225 we are talking modern christians who think the world began in 1920-30 and are now corporate directed, ie christcucks.

there are no true christians left.

>>8942 Pedophilia is egalitarian and runs directly opposite of hypergamy. Pedophiles are bad because only low teir men do it and those guys shouldn't reproduce. If you're successful and run things you aren't a pedophile no matter how much proof exists or how grievous your behavior.

>>9228 I can't tell if this is some kind of sarcasm or retardation.

>>9228 >Successful people can't be pedophiles no matter what That's really what you're going with.

>>9228 But do you believe in killig them?

>>9239 >>9231 >>9292 Its partly sarcastic, though the first sentence is true. The second follows the first from a fem and npc perspective, that hypergamy is good and the ultimate measure of right and wrong. E.g. its wrong for an adult to have sex with an underaged because of your advantages, but its not wrong for her to have sex with anyone her own age. Yes, shes only going to have sex with ones her own age who most resemble adults, and all of them will have the same advantages as you if not more so; but unlike you they didn't spend years working to reach that point, you creep. Ultimately the age of consent exists so she can, from an early age, only have sex with the best men. Since you had to work to be impressive to her after that age you're not him, you're subhuman and should cuck yourself to a woman your own age. A woman who spent her youth having tons of sex. This belief goes further since its also part of the its wrong to let children starve/go uneducated/die etc, you must support them! Women are more valuable than men and must be supported as well. Even if she had those children, and continues to, without you. These children that aren't yours are acts of god, and despite their parents and genetics are innocent and can only grow to be perfect unless you don't slave for them. Every sentiment about "think of the children" is ultimately from this view. The third sentence is said in the brain busting way npcs think. With successful people doing pedophilic stuff all the time and various state powers or state interests getting a pass for pedophilic acts, or parents themselves being the number one child abusers by a huge margin. All of those people are "successful", they've passed women's approval so they can't be "pedophiles". You'll notice when people talk about pedophilia its always going to be a caricature of an "unattractive" man, because that's ultimately and solely what they're against. And since hypergamy means that only a few men can ever be attractive, pedophilia will only be allowed for few. >>8942 >How come are pedos seen worse than murderers and other criminals I'd like to add that other criminals, murderers in particular, are stupidly attractive to women.

>>9294 You're retarded

>>9298 Nah they make good points

>>9294 This is based.

>>8979 checked

anyone that thinks an adult fucking a child is worse then murder should be locked up for their protection, the harm is worse for murder, what is worse killing a 13 yo girl's father or fucking the girl when she wants it and says suck my cock euranon, then thus watching murder videos is also worse then cp

>implying you don't know everybody sees us as hurtfags, it makes complete sense. I wouldn't want to give my kid, at least a decade of time investment, to some guy who may or may not be a psychopath, so it makes perfect sense to demonize pedos. Hell, I wouldn't give my phone, only a couple days work, to any old nigger on the street, why would I give up my kid? And I say this as somebody who would gladly cut up a narco's daughter and make pozole out of her paunch, as is my custom.

>>9605 >would gladly hurt people >us you are not a pedophile if you would consider hurting a child. hurtcore kikes are not pedophiles.

>>9607 This is an incorrect application kike. Also, hurtcore kikes not being the same as pedos is hardly a new stance (it's basically the default stance), and "pedos hurt kids" is an anti kiked retard position. Here is why you are wrong about no true scotsman in this case: Hurtcore is not being excluded, it is different in nature entirely. A pedophile is, in the most clinical of terms, a person who is sexually attracted to children. Your argument essentially boils down to "but hurtcore kikes who want to hurt kids and get sexual pleasure from it also fall under that definition". They are not sexually attracted to children, they get sexual pleasure from the abuse of the helpless. They aren't attracted or aroused by the child, but by the pain and suffering being inflicted. This is by definition different from pedophilia, and as such is not the no true scotsman fallacy. Example to round it off: >No scotsman is born in ireland >But my uncle is irish and is currently in scotland, or otherwise near enough to it that it's hard to tell >Okay, but that doesn't make him a scotsman Either you are a retard, or some variation of kike or kikeling. Hurtcore is not pedophilia, because creaming your pants over punting a baby into a volcano full of giant sharks does not mean you are aroused by babies.

>>9610 >but that doesn't make him a scotsman racist

>>9607 >jew uses logical fallacies as a weapon in his logically fallacious sophistry incredible

>>9606 Cry me a fucking river, you just replied to my post script instead of my actual argument Why would I, a sensible human being, press my little angel into the hands of some rando on the street, especially if he has romantic or sexual interest, which makes things volatile? It's just not worth it. People are fucked up, and pedophiles especially. I would let my kid have a relationship with someone I trust and have a sniper trained on 24/7. Final offer.

>>9655 I would only let my offspring enter into a relationship with a cismale if I could suck his penis, then I would know how he has sex and if my offspring could handle it or not.

>>9656 Gay

OP here. I gotta say some these replies are interesting. And some are just ridiculous. >>9655 Yeah that sounds reasonable minus the sniper part. A parent should have the right to care about their child. Supervising them is something I can get behind.

>>9605 >everybody sees us as hurtfags, it makes complete sense. Everyone sees us as unattractive ala >>9294 >to some guy who may or may not be a psychopath, so it makes perfect sense to demonize pedos. You could say that about everyman ever; and what about when shes two decades of investment and decides to be a whore, where's you wanting not to waste that investment then? Wheres society coming to back you up on how awful 20 years of investing has gone down the drain? Where are the special forces ready to kill because some man because he would like to "ruin" your two decades of investment? >Hell, I wouldn't give my phone, only a couple days work, to any old nigger on the street, why would I give up my kid? This is most telling of all. That you think that sex itself is losing her all together, no different than throwing her away. Society be believe this and enforce it but that doesn't mean it has to be. Its true that after some legal age or another you can't stop your kid from destroying herself, but that isn't what pedophiles are asking for. Why do you have a daughter? Eventually shes going to get married. What difference does it make if she gets married when shes 12 or 32?