Savarkar's mitra mela is very inspiring. Does anyone have his first publications that inspired bhagat singh and others ?
For a complex character like him, with multiple layers to him, some public, others private, it is tough to know what went in his head. He said many things to Brits and others which be did not believe in private, but that was just a means to an end.
> Savarkar sought and obtained an interview with Viceroy Lord Linlithgow in Delhi on 6 October 1939. Linlithgow was to later record that while he found his guest ‘a not very attractive type of little man’, but he was ‘definitely interesting’ and that they had a ‘very friendly talk’. In a secret correspondence the very next day, Linlithgow detailed the contours of his meeting with Savarkar and seemed rather wary of him:
<The situation he [Savarkar] said was that His Majesty’s Government must now turn to the Hindus and work with their support. After all, though we and the Hindus had a good deal of difficulty in the past, and was equally true of the relations between Great Britain and the French and, as recent events have shown, of relations between Russia and Germany, our interests are now the same and we must work together. Even though now most moderate of men, he had himself been in the past an adherent of a revolutionary party . . . but now that our interests are so closely bound together that essential thing was for Hinduism and Great Britain to be friends and old antagonism was no longer necessary. The Hindu Mahasabha, he went on to say, favoured an unambiguous undertaking of Dominion Status at the end of the War. It was true, at the same time that they challenged the Congress claim to represent anything but themselves. The Congress has accepted office under false pretence and on an understanding that they were doing so in order to wreck the constitution. But we Hindus were waiting for them. There was a great deal of Congress policy, which it was impossible for the Hindu Mahasabha to oppose because it was essentially a Hindu policy, but for all that the Mahasabha was determined to have them out. If he could, he could produce much better men to the places so vacated. He went on to urge a repeal of the Arms Act and a national militia, of the compulsory military training for the educated youth of the Hindu community and the readjustment of the plan of recruitment for the ordinary Indian Army in favour of classes at present without a real chance of securing admission in the army. It was of utmost importance, he said, that we should chastise the frontier tribes. He could only think that we have some arrangement with the Afghans, which prevented us from taking a strong line with them. But the chastisement must be with Hindu troops, the only troops on which we could rely.