>>1714
>>1714
I asked regarding your experiences, not differences. The few BD women I met, they were nice and sweet, but they did seek men without any mercy, rejecting them at the slightest hint of weakness.
>>1711
Ofc. Anglos are the worst of the worst. Agents of अधर्म। They are mleechs of the highest order.
> SA
What is that ? Sexual assault. My own experiences mirror this, I escaped police cases by hairs breadth in many cases.
>>1708
>>1707
>>1706
>>1699
>>1697
These need solid solid responses. Ok, lets discuss the first principles.
Can a society produce the goods it needs ?
Is a societies consumption sustainable by its own resources or does it need to exploit the resources of others to sustain it ?
Will west survive if it stops getting cheap resources from Africa, cheap labour from India and cheap goods from China ?
In modern GAE terms, Bangladesh perfected its strategy, it manufactured few goods, did it well, exploited its resources and population to the max, this policy has its limits and BD has reached its peak.
To move forward ,
- Either get scientific advances that others don't have. This won't happen, because as soon as it does, GAE will steal these thinkers for itself or kill them.
- Exploit other economies for cheaper labour or resources, than others. This can be done by causing war in its neighbourhood for example.
> Every Western country has a population that has steadily increased but continue to enjoy high standards of living.
They never had anything comparable to Asia or African density. Whenever their populations needed resources, a country was invaded or destroyed.
Population is useless in a limited range of total fertility i.e. ~ 2.7.
Too much deviation from this will cause trouble, one way or the other.
> I said overpopulation is not the cause of a lack of these.
People are useful only in developing economies. In developed economies like America, the country doesn't need its people.
American arms industry can keep importing south Americans and let the whites pay tax's to death, while sustaining its economy and being top of the world.
Like China, Anglo's too direct most of their efforts, against their own citizens the most.