>>31176
>Nice try, but you are hurting your own argument and favoring my own in your own post.
No, i literally pointed out the fact in my previous post that having leftist social values doesn't imply an attraction to an specific set of fetishistic content. This is true the other way around too, for the sake of clarity.
>but for this specific topic it suffices
No, an appeal to vague genetic components that somehow divides the entirety of humanity within the two options of the political landscape of the us doesn't suffice, it doesn't explain or come close to begin explaining the varied aspects of human sexuality nor the particular aspects related to this fetish. You are literally implying humans are genetic machines that are coded since birth to vote elephant or donkey, and that it somehow is also related to fetishes in a way that just so happens to add to the narrative of the """right""" for the particular political landscape of western countries in the current year, never mind the fact this crude analysis doesn't hold to scrutiny in historical or foreign contexts. Maybe communists in cuba are secret bbc fetishists, right.
>You and other lefitsts
This is where you show your hand, your intentions are quite clear, instead of trying to argue in good faith, you are adamant about painting everyone with the fetish you don't like as "genetic leftists". This is the conclusion you arrived at the start and you are merely trying to rationalize your way out of that with faulty logic regarding incomplete genetic studies on politics, a lot of them don't even replicate. Just to be clear, i am not a leftists and others reading this will probably tell you the same thing, they are not leftists either.
>it is leftist publications that put out dozens of articles on 'how to be a good cuck'
Now that you are being picky and bad faith, you should realize the fact we are not talking about cuckoldry here, we are talking about a very specific fetish that at best is subset of cuckoldry. You will never see any publication of any kind talking about BNWO. They will even say this kind of fetishes are dehumanizing for blacks, that is besides the point anyways.
>I am here because I thought this was an actual 'interracial' board that served what 'interracial' is in a broad possible meaning
It only takes a banner or the sticky to realize that is not the case. Why do you feel the need to lie? Aren't you the same guy that is arguing that porn itself is a leftist thing? You must be a fellow genetic leftist too then if you are looking for porn and interracial porn at that (low in group preference)
>Also, leftists don't believe in white replacement? Do you really believe that?
Yes, they quite literally say that and argue that all of the time. You must be able to read their minds if you doubt they are being sincere. You actually believe people that disagree politically with you are not uninformed but literally evil too? Pick a struggle man.
>Leftists came up with the term 'Demographics is destiny' to sum up their perceptions of what their longterm outlook on their preferred political party is
I doubt your average leftist knows who Comte is, i doubt that quotes is specifically talking about race, i doubt all or even most leftist agree with the meaning you are trying to assign to the quote here or with the quote itself within its original meaning. Are you able see how this looks from the outside? You are grasping at straws.
>They obviously know and the more you leftists post such obvious lies about yourselves in order to protect the image you have conjured up for yourselves, the more you discredit whatever you say here
Stop projecting, nobody is trying to protect an image here, except maybe you, why are you so pissy about the topic? If everyone here is a leftists except you why do you believe anyone would be trying to protect an image here? From whom? The neutral third party casually browsing this thread filled to the brim with black on white sexual imagery?
>Who is much more likely to have masochistic tendencies? The left or the right?
Who knows? You are of course talking about a very specific kind of leftist, the white college educated progressive, i will give you the benefit of the doubt and say that yes, it is likely this very specific kind of leftist has masochistic tendencies, i don't know that, but lets pretend it is true, how does it follow that this masochism will develop into interracial black fetishism?
>Leftist male masochists prefer bmwf because they feel it degrades them most intensely as men
What is the basis for this? I have explained the theory of mind of the right winger with a black interracial fetish, what is the theory of mind of the leftist that has a black interracial fetish? They just have the fetish? Surely, something i won't deny is that there are leftists that have a BNWO fetish too, but by the very nature of this fetish, to the extent they do, they have racist beliefs, racist beliefs are essential for this fetish because the idea of the black male as an inferior non equal being that taints a woman after fucking her is a racist idea. This idea is unthinkable within the kind of leftist thought you are mentioning, even for people with an iconoclast streak, in their mind all races are supposed to be equal aside from skin color, remember?
>what we are now seeing as I have said in previous posts here is that gen-z leftist female masochists are now starting to prefer rightwing/fascist domination kink play with in their view manlier White men to serve their appetite as that not only degrades them as women, but also gives them thrills with men who are otherwise taboo to their politics
Funny how that works, no? I welcome you provide an argument as to why this very thought process would not be possible within the mind of masochistic men from the right. And no, this is not new, leftist women have always had the hots for right wing men, this is a common trope, and it is just a variant of another common trope of women lusting after members of the out group, does Romeo and Juliet ring any bells?
>this is also why the males are so adamant about forcing a narrative that the right created bnwo, they don't want their women to look down on them as racial fetishists
Yeah, in all likelihood, this thread
>>51 was created by scheming leftist men trying to scam their (our) women, the ones that are known to frequently visit this board, into thinking they (we) are not racial fetishists. But you know that, you were in the weekly genetic leftist meeting where we discussed that plan, i saw you!
>they already hold too much cognitive dissonance - too much is giving them more mental illness than they can cope with. This kink is much less burdensome for them
This is explanation is more convoluted and strange than the one i gave to describe the inner mechanisms of the right winger masochist, but i will take your word for it since it seem you are talking from experience.
>The vast majority of the right doesn't really get stimulated in the same way
You simply claim this, no proof.
>there is no 'inversion of morals' for them - they are not that pathological
I know you have not given too much honest thought to these things you are saying because a complete lack of self reflection is evident in every one of them. Maybe Joe the blue collar worker that votes Trump because mexicans are stealing his job is in fact not that pathological, i will grant you Joe doesn't even know anything about porn at all, he might be against it, but the same way there are multiple kind of leftist, there are multiple kinds of rightists. Do you really believe we are talking about Joe here? We are talking about the kinds of people that roam on twitter forcing memes such as Total Nigger Death, the people that spam dead nigger babies to own the libs, the kind of people that find it hilarious to have twitter handles such as hitleriancunnyrapist1488, people whose entire internet persona revolves around demonstrating to others how racist they are, many of them are self described incels too, even if they are not celibate. Do these people smell like perfect mental health? Certainly not to me, they are pathological, and that is not to say i personally have something against them, or that these people are all blacked fetishist, many of them are my friends. The problem with your whole perspective is the fact you take way to literally the concept of genetic predisposition for specific ideologies. I argue that yes, it exists, but that doesn't change the fact the environment has the most influence over that, take for instance the current social climate of the west, were leftist values are very prevalent, in all honesty, do you really believe someone with a genetic predisposition for iconoclasm and contrarianism will adopt a mainstream leftist stance? It makes no sense they would, they will oppose whoever is in power reflexively, and they will maintain the same propensity for mental illness. Do you understand now?