>>3249
>That pic
The guy earns some of the money because that's the system he created. He spent the time and money doing the research on how to market his products. Then, he financed and organized the entire production line so that he could make the tea cups in a profitable manner. And, he still gets part of the money after hiring people on to replace him in those positions because he's the one directing the company in where it goes, how it expands, and maintaining a system provides an income for all the people working under him. How do these retards think companies rise and fall in the first place?
>Capitalism is just meritocracy.
<meritocracy: (1) a system in which the talented are chosen and moved ahead on the basis of their achievement; (2) a group of leaders chosen on the basis of their talents and achievements
Clearly you don't know a damn thing about capitalism, otherwise you'd know that capitalism don't give one single shit about your education, talents, or achievement. If education was all it took to be successful in a capitalist society, then you wouldn't have millions of college graduates who are stuck working at the local Starbucks. If talent was all it took to be successful in a capitalist society, then the Olympics wouldn't be as much of a joke as it is to where the city governments to tax the citizens on order to promote the "talent" the event provides. And, if achievement was all it took to be successful in a capitalist society, then there should have been
zero reason that it took inventions like the light bulb, the automobile, and computers
DECADES until they finally caught on. In fact, that last reason shows
EXACTLY what living in a capitalist society is all about.
The first "motor car" was built in 1885, but it wasn't until Henry Ford invented the assembly line (Making the production of an automobile very inexpensive and efficient, and
affordable for the general public) in 1913 that automobile sales skyrocketed through the roof. Humphry Davy created the first "modern lights" with the creation of the incandescent light (1802) and the arc lamp (1806), but it was Edison (In 1879) who found a way to make the incandescent light an actually viable and inexpensive commodity. And, then, with computers, you used to have these massive mainframes that took up entire rooms (If not complexes), and the earliest "home computers" where entire "do-it-yourself" kits; but it wasn't until Apple, Commodore, Atari, and Microsoft started making computers user-friendly, pre-assembled, and efficient that things really took off.
Boiling it all down, Capitalism has absolutely NOTHING to do with meritocracy.
>This is the Mouse Utopia we already discussed about.
The mouse utopia experiments only applies to societies than you have no escape from (I.E. a prison). And, later experiments revealed that having entertainment, tasks to accomplish, and dreams to strive for negated the apocalyptic outcome that the original experiments foretold.
>Abolishing feudalism and starting captalism is LITERALLY the same as giving rights to slaves.
Slaves have nearly always had rights throughout history. In fact, slaves could literally buy back their freedom if they wanted it.