/loli/ - loli

FLAT IS JUSTICE!

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0.

US Election Thread

8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.


(132.12 KB 600x862 122157058_p0_master1200.webp)

Intense Loli captions Anonymous 10/19/2024 (Sat) 20:56:11 No. 7108
This kind of thing usualy isn't allowed but I read through rules and there's nothing against it. Yay?!
Mmm
(1.27 MB 1080x1578 9867982f8b6205fd.webp)

(65.18 KB 960x767 fake loli graph.jpg)

>>7108 >I read through rules and there's nothing against it. I almost wanted to say you're wrong after looking at the image, but double checking the rules, I think the OP image's top statement is just borderline. It can be used as the absolute limit of the rules so long as a thread like this doesn't become a problem like loli self-hypno threads have in the past. Regardless, third party caption edits are cringey and gay. Get some better taste. >>7109 Firstly, this image is further cropped from the original for no reason. Here's the original but still edited image. Secondly, urls are case sensitive, but some retard has made it all caps. Thirdly, I tried all permutations of lower and upper case links to try and verify whether it was something that needs to be deleted, and it seems that link either the link is dead, or I failed to enter it correctly. Catbox doesn't ban most things, and files on it are permanent, so I can only assume it was illegal material if it's now 404ing. I'm deleting it for being suspicious linking in case I made some typo and it's linking something illegal. Fourthly, the graph itself is bullshit. Nothing in the cited study can be used to derive that graph, and the graph itself was copied over from another study, then edited to have the ages shifted over. In summary, your image shit, pedoshit, fake, and gay, and I'm strongly considering banning third party caption autism on both the basis of attracting real pedoshit and just general overall low quality in accordance with rule 7, given how this thread is off to a wonderful start.


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply