>>3610 Yes, pretty much. This is what sets apart Sovereign and Subject.

>>3610 I'm pretty sure that (as I think someone said in the Grace thread), only the peasants and slaving masses need to concern themselves with "potty training", or holding it in while they work. Grace and all good princesses don\t need to care about such things, and can appreciate and fill in only the softest and comfiest of diapers as they work.

Obsession over continence is nothing new in Royalty. The French Monarchy for example were obsessed with enemas where is was considered the highest point of fashion and the French nobility did not have to concern themselves for where they went potty. It was not uncommon to see Maids diving under dresses to apply an enema and allowing the Lady to relieve herself on the spot. Meanwhile the Maids themselves had to endure a strict potty schedule, each receiving an enema before they started work and control their bowels. It would not be hard to take a leap into a fantasy of a padded monarchy when close enough things have already happened in reality. Could very well become fashionable to see the high born strut around in diapers with the servants cleaning up after them. With Grace though it is a question of how she would look to rule? With diapers and spankings for the unruly subjects or to horde that as a sign of luxury for herself? Will she rule as a tyrant with her subjects over her knee with their backsides whacked till they wet their padding? Or will she prefer to be a hedonist that lounges around enjoy leisure activities while a servant wipes her bottom clean?

Starting to wonder how many Royals have been bedwetters in history?

>>3808 all of them

>>4529 We are not bedwetters.

>>4547 Could have fooled me. You fold like a paper napkin. You had exposure across the webring. I even cleaned your goddamn board for you in expectation of anons wandering by. and what do I find when the match finishes? SPAM! A whole catalog full again. GROW A FUCKING PAIR AND DO YOUR JOB.

>>4549 Someone needs a nap I think. If you're talking about the cafe bunker all that really serves to do is redirect people here, maybe it would be worth seeing if it could be set to a read-only state.

>>3610 Pervsion and faggotry goes back to Cain and his faggot kids. I would suggest the Prince of Hell if you want to discuses queershit with a "monarch"

bump

Does /abdl/ still visit this board?

>>6473 /abdl/ basically drove out all the Graceposters who then lost interest on this site.

>>6582 The 8kun anons that migrated here last year having no interest in this and the new /abdl/ BO not encouraging it like the previous BO is what killed anons interest continuing this tradition. We even have an anon talking shit >>>/abdl/29195 about Grace not being worthy of being a mascot without any punishment from the BO for using such disloyal words to our hime-sama. This >>6407 is the last Grace related OC edit I did and sadly one of only a few done this year. I want to change that with a new /abdl/ board that will encourage board-tan edits someday again like back then and try to get it connected to the webring even if that idea hasn't been the most successful for the other board's activity. For now I'm trying to regroup lost anons that want the julay and old 8chan.moe /abdl/ back through endchan at https://endchan.net/abdl/

>>6595 We have 3D models recently. There will be a drought of Grace OC for a bit.

>>6595 Endchan is unusable for most with a VPN. >>6596 3d diapered Grace?

>>6597 Have had no issues with mullvad the entire time. Also usable with tor with file uploads allowed. No annoying captchas either. http://endchancxfbnrfgauuxlztwlckytq7rgeo5v6pc2zd4nyqo3khfam4ad.onion/ This is only temporary until I can gauge user activity and interest for an IB.

>>6597 >>6598 We have new Grace art too, /abdl/ visitors.

>>6598 /abdl/ anon should try visiting /tkr/. They're a nice board.

/tkr/ drew /abdl/'s tan

>>6596 Impressive!

>>6596 Very nice! Self-made, or was she a commission? I'm now mildly interested in getting an avatar made for Lila on /tkr/

>>6691 It was commission. I could help hook you up with an artist, if you'd like.

>>6692 Sure, I'd like to at least give it a look.

>>6717 Many thanks, friend! I love the first guy's work, but it looks like he's taking a break from commissions at the moment. It'll be a little while before anything happens I guess, but consider it in the pipeline.

>>6727 Oh, yeah. I took a look at his website first and assumed commissions were closed. I didn't want tobe a bother. But I DM'd and now it's in the works. Thanks for the contact!

>>6596 What about her pantsu?