>>4034 The best an American President can hope for are two terms in office. Remember, a limited monarch has the relationship of a particular to general, therefore no matter how great your leader would be... it will never compare to the status of the pre-eminent Monarch whose relationship is that of the general to particular... or has the relationship of the whole State in himself. You might be surprised I use the term 'limited monarch' to describe the Presidency, but that's how I view it. There is in effect no difference between a statesman, a king, a dictator, or household manager, per say, in that their governance is the same kind of skill and expertise... the only importance would be whether this is one statesman, one king, one dictator, or one despot, and whether this ruler has the relationship of general to particular, and a perpetual power. It is noted, that a statesman takes his turn in being governed... that means swapping in and out of office with his peers. If you have the greatest leader in human history, isn't it terrible you will only see this leader for a few terms of office? Compare that to Louis XIV, whose reign was a lifetime and fought multiple wars and coalitions and was building a colonial empire and domestic policy for so long.

>>4035 Yes, but what if a mediocre leader serving for a lifetime prevents the Great Leader from assuming power?

>>4036 Pre-eminence has so much strength embodied in one person, that any natural ability wouldn't be on par... so even great persons would recognize, in their own humility, the sovereign person.

>>4037 But that is the problem. How can one follow a leader such as Grace, when she is so clearly inferior to commiecat?

>>4038 Commiecat is inferior to fucking nice tbh. Also she can't be a leader. She has no royal blood.

>>4039 I figured that's the reason she must consume Grace; so she can acquire the royal blood.

>>4040 I don't think it works that way... Hold on Grace where are the books of peerage?

>>4041 I mean theoretically if a commiecat ate Grace like 90% of Grace would become a part of the commiecat so it basically makes sense.

Is Graceposter male or female?

>>4043 I assume its a dude. With austism. And one friend who he is always talking to. Still fun to jump in occasionally with you two though.

>>4044 I've had a series of large financial windfalls over the past year and I'm still internally debating if I should waste some of it on commissioning some ungodly commiecat/Grace vore fetish material and post it here. On one hand it would be amusing, but I'm not sure if the hit to my dignity would be worth it. How much do art commissions cost anyway? What about video shit?

>>4045 >commission vore fetish art

>>4046 I don't want to do it, but the impish mischievous side of me wants to see your reaction. My only fear is how deep down the rabbit hole of weird shit I will end up going in an effort to make something truly unspeakably horriffic, and how much damage my soul will take as a result. And you didn't answer -- are you a guy or female?

>>4047 You probably will fall into a rabbit hole. >And you didn't answer -- are you a guy or female? Do you really think a girl would spend all this time posting on 8ch.moe & shill absolute monarchy?

>>4052 I don't. But then I'm not dumb enough to believe in communism either. So yeah he probably does believe that.

>>4052 Do you have any commiecats to post that aren't terrible? Doesn't even have tits tbh.

>>4053 I don't believe in communism though.

>>4055 No one believes you.

>>4056 Why would I lie? I'm not doing anything important here. I'm shitposting with pics of a catgirl.

>>4057 Which is exactly what a commie would say. I think we should organize a star chamber and get to the bottom of this.

>>4058 If I was a commie, why would I want to rape the commie cat? A commie would simp for it.

>>4034 >Theodore Roosevelt >Greatest Leader in Human History >This is what plebs think

>>4060 Julius Caesar governed $p@!n, and during that time he failed to genocide even a small portion of the population. How can any leader be great having failed in the most basic task of leadership?

>>4059 Because you are a communist. You hunger for food and rape. Seems logical enough.

>>4065 I hunger for rape, yes, but only of communists. And how do I "hunger for food?"

>>4066 >implying you do not hunger for food What are you a robot?

>>4069 You said "hunger for food" as if that's something I do particularly that makes me a commie.

>>4070 Communists are usually hungry. You talk about eating stuff all the time. It fits.

>>4034 >>4035 It's worth noting that when Washington became president there was no term limit, theoretically he could have served three, four, five, or even more terms. What made Washington great, was that he not only refused the opportunity to become King of America, and establish the Washington dynasty, but after two terms, he said it was enough and it was time for someone else to take his place. He had all the power in the world and he relinquished it, which out of respect for his decision, made the two term limit an unofficial rule that had been kept for about 130 years, until Roosevelt got his third term, citing WW2, after which congress panicked and enacted the 22nd Amendment limiting a president to only two terms.

>>4055 But it exists. How can you not believe in it? And, really, communism wasn't nearly as bad as Western countries try and make it out to be. There were a lot of good benefits to it (education, healthcare, worker's rights, etc); it made the working class more powerful than it is now under whatever you want to call this government type that most countries have drifted into-- >>4073 Why do you think they like term limits? Personally, I don't like them at all and I am glad they are being pushed against in my country. If a leader is good, surely they should be able to keep being elected without being forced out of office?

>>4071 When do I talk about eating?

>>4074 Keep in mind, what I say applies to Prime Ministers and others in government, who take their turns in being governed, rotate by party coalition. The Monarchist ideal of pre-eminence is the person should be recognized at once as being in relation of the whole totality of the State and its interests and make the State itself reflect the character of this person, imbue the State with his personality as the soul of the Commonwealth. That's a step up from terms, because rather than by coalition or terms or any means of taking 'their turn' in being governed, the Sovereign himself becomes a perpetual ruler. The ideal of a Hereditary Royal Monarchy is to extend a familial bond to the People and make them all stronger. Aristotle says, The royal State prevailed because 'they were suckled by the same milk and shared the same blood'. In Christianity, this royal bond prevails when Christians drink the blood of Christ, exactly what Aristotle said what prevailed for the royal bond. The problem is trying to realize this as a political ideal for Monarchists. I believe Royal Monarchy has so much potential untapped.

>>4079 Yeah sure whatever but a government run by a commiecat acting as my puppet would be far superior to Grace.

>>4080 >implying commiecat isn't my puppet

>>4081 If commiecat is Grace's puppet then why is Grace destined to commiecat's food?

>>4081 Commiecats have diseases. Don't let them get their germs on you.

>>4121 What diseases? All commiecats would be inspected for contamination before sale, and infected commiecats would be incinerated.

>>4034 hey look at me im on topic cause I pretend to pay lip service to monarchism