>>5133 I own GME, I'm based, none of these fags do.

What the fuck does this mean? It shows on the developer console on tor browser after I spend some time on the site and try to post after solving the captcha. It does nothing when I press reply. Sometimes I cannot post even 1 post and the only way to fix it is getting a new identity altogether (e.g. DELETE FUCKING EVERYTHING) and then I have to reopen everything manually.

Acid I am not your fucking boogeyman, I'm a random ass anon that fucking laughs at gamergays, you guys are insane. I have never been in any leadership position of any GG related board at any point. I was on old 8ch, I fucking memed on GG there too, we all did. I don't run any spam shit, I'm technologically incompetent as fuck and totally a normie as far as that goes, programming wise I'm a retard.

Can you please explain how I'm supposed to not laugh at some ridiculous bullshit like thinking we're all fighting a war against game journalists online, or how I'm to pretend you don't do crazy overreactions like when you blew up /hebe/ or /b/ repeatedly over the last year for no reason.

I dunno how to really disprove outlandish claims like this because from my perspective all I've done is fucking shitpost, I only know your name because of pic related and barely knew who you were before this iteration of the site, which I do kind of find to be ultra shitty and I rail against it but I'm not fucking botspamming and can't program anything. Never a computer major, the only such educational attainment I ever vaguely sought was an English degree and I dropped out because it was gay and learning sucks.

Also sorry about the filename I saved it in butthurt, I will admit I get butthurt when my posts never get captchas and I have to constantly clear cookies to post because the bypass usage limit thing. Do you see why my original message to you in the meta thread is bitching about how hard it is to post? It's so fucking hard to post here, it's so counter-intuitive for a site that wants posts.

I tried to contribute to more than one board constructively but it has only gotten worse constantly since my first time using the site 2 years ago and yes I realize there's other altchans but all of them are dead and this one has fun identities I like on it. And I shit stir against you because what the fuck can I as a user do about it but fuck off, which I have too little sense to do. I can't vibe with the gamergate shit at all, or the blacked shit, that's not because of a grand conspiracy it's because maybe seeing all of the bullshit from /interracial/ on the front page about raping white girls to death is fucked up as hell, my dude.

>>5142 2 years ago might be pushing it I barely remember when this busted off of 8coon and I missed that site entirely due to being on 9ch

pls respond acidchad the gamer lord to my pleas for temperance and mercy and acknowledgement of my insignificance

I emailed you guys in the interest of transparency and ethics in shitposting, pls respond.

I realize I also have this pic of me being here going back a ways, relating to some /b/ drama I faceposted somewhat with this timestamp, pic should be on here I would think and you could see I go back a ways. I'm not a johnny come lately attacking you guys, I'm just an ungrateful cunt.

check it out I'm such an OG 8channer I've got the epic SVU mask from the gg episode and everything we used to have good times back then when the site worked

please be understanding of my autistic 11 posts in a row I'm trying to clear my name here

gmebro/Agent Johnson/smol/John use to frequently post on Cutiegarden (a now defunct pedo website) about getting altchans shoahed by any means possible: spamming, DDoSing, FUD, CP spam etc. Acid is right for once.

>>5149 lmao FUD? like stock FUD? bullshit though I did not botspam or ddos or spam CP anywhere FUD is literally fear, uncertainty, doubt? Idk how you can even spread that about a site, I've said sites were shit and certain aspects especially like the intense captchas here. I'm still not revoltfag or anyone Acid thinks I am either btw.

>>5149 > Cutiegarden > pedo website interesting that you would be so knowledgable about such things. yeah, you might want to just stop talking right now before you shoot yourself in the other foot. moron.

Roo wtf is life anymore

If that's you I think it is by the blank name.

>>5151 I'm shaking from this post. When you do something lmk.

i am merely a concerned citizen. a concerned citizen with scary connections who periodically emerges to remind the tinfoil wearing, retards of the world that they actually are just insignificant gnats with delusions of grandeur and self-importance. these people always need imaginary boogeymen--invisible windmills to tilt at like some schizo Don Quixote. it's all they've got. literal children who never grew out of playing pretend "army" in the backyards with cap guns when they were 7 years old. all of the GG retards are nothing more than this, not to mention the unironic nu/pol/ larping faggots. just point at them and laugh.

>>5155 This post was typed by pedo hands. Ignore.

>>5157 >t. Roo, an outspoken pedophile

>>5137 It's a known issue with Firefox and its derivatives. It's on my radar.

>>5160 Ah, I see. Is there anything I can do to work around it when it happens?

What exactly counts as "NSFW"? I'm a Christian so I think my idea of "NSFW" might be stricter than usual but, basically, I would like to be able to browse /v/ without being exposed to softcore pornography. Can I report unspoilered softcore pornography or is that SFW? On that note, I'd also like to bring up a second point: Since I heavily suspect that softcore pornography is considered SFW, I would like to say, why? Rationally, is softcore pornography truly SFW? Would it really be okay for your boss to catch you looking at softcore porn when you should be working? I don't think even softcore porn is actually SFW.

>>5161 It seems to happen most often when restarting the browser, and clears itself after some time. If I need to post immediately, restarting the browser sometimes helps. Failing that, I just use a different browser. It's inconvenient, but it should be resolved soon. >>5190 I wouldn't take the term "Safe For Work" literally. Trying to cater to the sensibilities of an imagined "normal workplace" would require most files on the site being spoilered on SFW boards. HR is notoriously humorless, and I doubt a picture of Hitler or an anime girl shouting "Aw Shit Nigga" would be viewed any more favorably than lewd drawings. And softcore is a board category. Nudity has a pretty clear definition, as it is understood by film and television censors at least, and has much less room for interpretation. An effort is made to spoiler nudity and gore so it does not make its way onto the front page. Board owners are free to require their board follow stricter guidelines. I think the average user of this website knows what to expect from the site, and from their favorite boards, and can risk browsing based on their personal circumstances. I don't think bending over backwards to appease HR at every company worldwide is a realistic goal, nor is it in the spirit of 8chan. The SFW distinction does a good job of keeping nudity off the front page, and it allows the SFW Overboard to be free of porn boards.

>>5191 What exactly is the point of keeping nudity off of the front page or allowing the user to easily find non-porn boards? Why take pride in this accomplishment? I absolutely believe a SFW board should be, with regards to the images shared on it, compliant with the general expectations of companies' HR departments. What even is the point of "SFW" if it's not literally SFW? Are there just two types of boards: boards with discussion and light porn and boards for outright dumping all manner of porn? Do you restrict porn to better foster actual discussion, perhaps? Is that the purpose? It's true that "SFW" is actually somewhat nebulous when one tries to really concretely define it but nonetheless, I think there's enough of an intuitive idea of what is and isn't acceptable on daytime TV or a family-friendly film that SFW could be implemented literally as is already the case in TV and film right now as we speak.

Where can I find pictures of the Acidman's hairy penis, preferably erect?

>>5191 >If I need to post immediately, restarting the browser sometimes helps. Failing that, I just use a different browser Yes, but as you can imagine if I have to restart the browser every time I want to post I'm just not going to post. It's become really burdensome to post here. It's also not so easy to replace tor browser with some other browser.

>>5205 As I said, it's a known issue and is being worked on. We are in the process of moving all storage accesses as part of refactoring that system. I also use a Firefox derivative and am impacted by this bug. You can actually use Tor with any browser you want. You could also consider Brave, which has the option to open tabs in Tor and also bundles privacy features.

>closing the one 8chan tab javascript is enabled frees up hundreds of MBs of memory in both RAM and swap Why can't I leave a single thread on autorefresh for one or two days without the site eating into my memory?

>>5209 I'll profile the memory usage and see if we can cut it down. We've made a lot of tweaks to accommodate websockets, so it would be nice to verify there's no memory leaks.

Why does the verifaction take so much time and when I cancel it it blocks me from posting?

>>5412 This happens when Proof of Work (PoW) is enabled. You need a bypass to post. When PoW is on, you need to generate a token to get a bypass. When you cancel it, you don't get a bypass, so you cannot post.